Suppr超能文献

经颅直流电刺激治疗原发性进行性失语的系统评价:方法学考量

A Systematic Review of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Primary Progressive Aphasia: Methodological Considerations.

作者信息

Coemans Silke, Struys Esli, Vandenborre Dorien, Wilssens Ineke, Engelborghs Sebastiaan, Paquier Philippe, Tsapkini Kyrana, Keulen Stefanie

机构信息

Clinical and Experimental Neurolinguistics, CLIEN, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Front Aging Neurosci. 2021 Oct 7;13:710818. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.710818. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

A variety of tDCS approaches has been used to investigate the potential of tDCS to improve language outcomes, or slow down the decay of language competences caused by Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA). The employed stimulation protocols and study designs in PPA are generally speaking similar to those deployed in post-stroke aphasic populations. These two etiologies of aphasia however differ substantially in their pathophysiology, and for both conditions the optimal stimulation paradigm still needs to be established. A systematic review was done and after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 15 articles were analyzed focusing on differences and similarities across studies especially focusing on PPA patient characteristics (age, PPA variant, language background), tDCS stimulation protocols (intensity, frequency, combined therapy, electrode configuration) and study design as recent reviews and group outcomes for individual studies suggest tDCS is an effective tool to improve language outcomes, while methodological approach and patient characteristics are mentioned as moderators that may influence treatment effects. We found that studies of tDCS in PPA have clinical and methodological and heterogeneity regarding patient populations, stimulation protocols and study design. While positive group results are usually found irrespective of these differences, the magnitude, duration and generalization of these outcomes differ when comparing stimulation locations, and when results are stratified according to the clinical variant of PPA. We interpret the results of included studies in light of patient characteristics and methodological decisions. Further, we highlight the role neuroimaging can play in study protocols and interpreting results and make recommendations for future work.

摘要

多种经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)方法已被用于研究tDCS改善语言能力或减缓原发性进行性失语(PPA)所致语言能力衰退的潜力。PPA研究中采用的刺激方案和研究设计总体上与中风后失语人群中所采用的相似。然而,这两种失语病因在病理生理学上有很大差异,并且对于这两种情况,最佳刺激模式仍有待确定。我们进行了一项系统综述,在应用纳入和排除标准后,分析了15篇文章,重点关注各项研究之间的异同,特别是PPA患者特征(年龄、PPA亚型、语言背景)、tDCS刺激方案(强度、频率、联合治疗、电极配置)以及研究设计,因为近期的综述和个别研究的组内结果表明tDCS是改善语言能力的有效工具,同时提到方法学方法和患者特征是可能影响治疗效果的调节因素。我们发现,PPA的tDCS研究在患者群体、刺激方案和研究设计方面存在临床和方法学上的异质性。尽管无论这些差异如何通常都能得到阳性组结果,但在比较刺激部位时,以及根据PPA的临床亚型对结果进行分层时,这些结果的程度、持续时间和普遍性有所不同。我们根据患者特征和方法学决策来解读纳入研究的结果。此外,我们强调神经影像学在研究方案制定和结果解读中可以发挥的作用,并对未来的工作提出建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0b1/8530184/06931856ca84/fnagi-13-710818-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验