• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间机械支持装置的作用。

The role of mechanical support devices during percutaneous coronary intervention.

作者信息

Kanyal Ritesh, Byrne Jonathan

机构信息

King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

JRSM Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 Oct 19;10:20480040211014064. doi: 10.1177/20480040211014064. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/20480040211014064
PMID:34691407
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8532259/
Abstract

The practice of interventional cardiology has changed dramatically over the last four decades since Andreas Gruentzig carried out the first balloon angioplasty. The obvious technological improvements in stent design and interventional techniques have facilitated the routine treatment of a higher risk cohort of patients, including those with complex coronary artery disease and poor left ventricular function, and more often in the setting of cardiogenic shock (CS) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The use of mechanical cardiac support (MCS) in these settings has been the subject of intense interest, particularly over the past decade . A number of commercially available devices now add to the interventional cardiologist's armamentarium when faced with the critically unwell or high-risk patient in the cardiac catheter laboratory. The theoretical advantage of such devices in these settings is clear- an increase in cardiac output and hence mean arterial pressure, with variable effects on coronary blood flow. In doing so, they have the potential to prevent the downward cascade of ischaemia and hypoperfusion, but there is a paucity of evidence to support their routine use in any patient subset, even those presenting with cardiogenic shock. This review will discuss the use and haemodynamic effect of MCS devices during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and also examine the clinical evidence for their use in patients with cardiogenic shock, and those undergoing 'high risk' PCI.

摘要

自安德烈亚斯·格伦齐格进行首例球囊血管成形术以来的过去四十年里,介入心脏病学实践发生了巨大变化。支架设计和介入技术的显著技术改进促进了对更高风险患者群体的常规治疗,包括那些患有复杂冠状动脉疾病和左心室功能不佳的患者,而且在急性心肌梗死(AMI)并发心源性休克(CS)的情况下更为常见。在这些情况下使用机械心脏支持(MCS)一直是人们密切关注的主题,尤其是在过去十年。现在,当心脏导管实验室面对病情危急或高风险的患者时,一些市售设备增加了介入心脏病专家的可用手段。此类设备在这些情况下的理论优势很明显——心输出量增加,进而平均动脉压升高,对冠状动脉血流有不同影响。这样做,它们有可能防止缺血和低灌注的下行级联反应,但缺乏证据支持在任何患者亚组中常规使用它们,即使是那些出现心源性休克的患者。本综述将讨论MCS设备在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)期间的使用和血流动力学效应,还将研究其在心源性休克患者和接受“高风险”PCI患者中使用的临床证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c7c/8532259/a68c86530bd4/10.1177_20480040211014064-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c7c/8532259/2b04a60ed10c/10.1177_20480040211014064-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c7c/8532259/a68c86530bd4/10.1177_20480040211014064-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c7c/8532259/2b04a60ed10c/10.1177_20480040211014064-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c7c/8532259/a68c86530bd4/10.1177_20480040211014064-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
The role of mechanical support devices during percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间机械支持装置的作用。
JRSM Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 Oct 19;10:20480040211014064. doi: 10.1177/20480040211014064. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
2
Mechanical circulatory support versus vasopressors alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.机械循环支持与单独使用血管加压素在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性心肌梗死合并心原性休克患者中的比较。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Jan;103(1):30-41. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30913. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
3
Utilization of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction and High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.经皮机械循环支持装置在急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克及高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用
J Clin Med. 2019 Aug 13;8(8):1209. doi: 10.3390/jcm8081209.
4
Ten-year trends, predictors and outcomes of mechanical circulatory support in percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗伴心原性休克的急性心肌梗死后十年机械循环支持的趋势、预测因素和结局。
EuroIntervention. 2021 Feb 5;16(15):e1254-e1261. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00226.
5
Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者使用机械循环支持装置的情况
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2037748. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37748.
6
Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.血管内微型轴流左心室辅助装置与主动脉内球囊泵在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者中的应用与院内死亡率和大出血的关系。
JAMA. 2020 Feb 25;323(8):734-745. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0254.
7
[Reperfusion therapy and mechanical circulatory support in patients in cardiogenic shock].[心源性休克患者的再灌注治疗与机械循环支持]
Herz. 1999 Oct;24(6):448-64. doi: 10.1007/BF03044431.
8
[Temporary percutaneous ventricular assist devices for cardiogenic shock and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic literature review].[用于心源性休克和高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的临时经皮心室辅助装置:一项系统文献综述]
G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2020 Feb;21(2):128-137. doi: 10.1714/3300.32706.
9
Effects of mechanical circulatory support devices in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing stent implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.机械循环支持装置在急性心肌梗死患者支架植入术中的作用:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 29;11(6):e044072. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044072.
10
Use of left ventricular support devices during acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention.急性冠状动脉综合征和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间左心室支持装置的应用
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2014 Dec;16(12):544. doi: 10.1007/s11886-014-0544-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Protected high risk percutaneous coronary intervention-Impella 5.0 as a single-access technique: a case report.受保护的高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗——使用Impella 5.0作为单通路技术:一例病例报告。
Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2024 Jan 30;8(2):ytae060. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytae060. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Retrospective Analysis of Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Use in Cardiology Ward Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography between 2012 and 2020.2012年至2020年间心内科病房接受冠状动脉造影患者主动脉内球囊反搏使用情况的回顾性分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 16;12(4):1567. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041567.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.血管内微型轴流左心室辅助装置与主动脉内球囊泵在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者中的应用与院内死亡率和大出血的关系。
JAMA. 2020 Feb 25;323(8):734-745. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0254.
2
The Evolving Landscape of Impella Use in the United States Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Mechanical Circulatory Support.美国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中机械循环支持患者中 Impella 使用的演变情况。
Circulation. 2020 Jan 28;141(4):273-284. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044007. Epub 2019 Nov 17.
3
Complications of Temporary Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock: An Appraisal of Contemporary Literature.心源性休克临时经皮机械循环支持的并发症:当代文献评估
Cardiol Ther. 2019 Dec;8(2):211-228. doi: 10.1007/s40119-019-00152-8. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
4
Left ventricular distension and venting strategies for patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合患者的左心室扩张及排气策略
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Apr;11(4):1676-1683. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.03.29.
5
Rationale and design of DanGer shock: Danish-German cardiogenic shock trial.背景和设计:丹麦-德国心原性休克试验(DanGer 休克试验)。
Am Heart J. 2019 Aug;214:60-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.04.019. Epub 2019 May 6.
6
Alternative Percutaneous Access for Large Bore Devices.大口径器械的替代经皮入路。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jun;12(6):e007707. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007707. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
7
SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock: This document was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in April 2019.美国心脏病学会(ACC)、美国心脏协会(AHA)、重症医学会(SCCM)和胸外科医师学会(STS)于 2019 年 4 月共同发布了心血管造影协会(SCAI)关于心源性休克分类的临床专家共识声明。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jul 1;94(1):29-37. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28329. Epub 2019 May 19.
8
Mechanical circulatory support with Impella versus intra-aortic balloon pump or medical treatment in cardiogenic shock-a critical appraisal of current data.机械循环支持与 Impella 与主动脉内球囊泵或药物治疗在心源性休克中的比较-对当前数据的批判性评价。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2019 Nov;108(11):1249-1257. doi: 10.1007/s00392-019-01458-2. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
9
Venoarterial ECMO for Adults: JACC Scientific Expert Panel.成人静脉动脉体外膜肺氧合:JACC 科学专家小组。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Feb 19;73(6):698-716. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.038.
10
New-generation mechanical circulatory support during high-risk PCI: a cross-sectional analysis.新一代机械循环支持在高危 PCI 中的应用:一项横断面分析。
EuroIntervention. 2019 Aug 29;15(5):427-433. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01126.