Kim Daniel
Bouvé College of Health Sciences & School of Public Policy and Urban Affairs, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Avenue, 413 International Village, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Jun 29;16:100862. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100862. eCollection 2021 Dec.
While social assistance through the U.S. federal CARES Act provided expanded unemployment insurance benefits during the COVID-19 pandemic until the summer of 2020, it is unclear whether social assistance was sufficient in subsequent months to meet everyday spending needs and to curb the adverse health-related sequelae of financial hardship.
Using multivariable Poisson log-binomial regression and repeated cross-sectional Household Pulse Survey data between September and December 2020 on 91,222 working-aged U.S. adults and 28,842 adult housing renters, this study explored the associations of financial hardship with mental health outcomes and food and housing insecurity after accounting for receipt of social assistance.
Financial hardship rose progressively from September to December 2020, and disproportionately affected Black non-Hispanic and Hispanic Americans and lower-income households. Experiencing considerable financial hardship (vs no hardship) predicted nearly 3-fold higher risks of anxiety and depressive symptoms (e.g., adjusted prevalence ratio, PR of depression = 2.75, 95% CI = 2.54-2.98, < .001), a 23-fold higher risk of food insufficiency (PR = 22.71, 95% CI = 15.62-33.01, < .001), and a 27-fold higher risk of a likely eviction (PR = 27.20, 95% CI = 10.63-69.59, < .001). Across outcomes, these relationships were stronger at each successively higher level of financial hardship (all values for linear trend <0.001), and more than offset benefits from social assistance.
Even after accounting for social assistance receipt, working-aged adults experiencing financial hardship had markedly greater risks of anxiety and depressive symptoms, food insufficiency, and an anticipated housing eviction. These findings point to the urgent need for direct and sustained cash relief well in excess of current levels of social assistance to mitigate the pandemic's adverse impacts on the well-being of millions of Americans, including vulnerable minority and low-income populations.
虽然美国联邦《新冠病毒援助、救济和经济安全法案》(CARES Act)提供的社会援助在2020年夏季之前的新冠疫情期间扩大了失业保险福利,但在随后的几个月里,社会援助是否足以满足日常支出需求并遏制财务困境对健康的不利后遗症尚不清楚。
本研究使用多变量泊松对数二项回归以及2020年9月至12月期间对91,222名美国工作年龄成年人和28,842名成年租房者的重复横断面家庭脉搏调查数据,探讨了在考虑社会援助接收情况后,财务困境与心理健康结果以及食品和住房不安全之间的关联。
财务困境在2020年9月至12月期间逐渐增加,并且对非西班牙裔黑人、西班牙裔美国人和低收入家庭产生了不成比例的影响。经历相当大的财务困境(与无困境相比)预示着焦虑和抑郁症状的风险几乎高出3倍(例如,调整后的患病率比值,抑郁症的PR = 2.75,95% CI = 2.54 - 2.98,P <.001),食品不足的风险高出23倍(PR = 22.71,95% CI = 15.62 - 33.01,P <.001),以及可能被驱逐的风险高出27倍(PR = 27.20,95% CI = 10.63 - 69.59,P <.001)。在所有结果中,这些关系在财务困境的每一个连续更高水平上都更强(所有线性趋势的P值<0.001),并且超过了社会援助带来的益处。
即使在考虑了社会援助接收情况之后,经历财务困境的工作年龄成年人出现焦虑和抑郁症状、食品不足以及预期住房被驱逐的风险仍然显著更高。这些发现表明,迫切需要提供远远超过当前社会援助水平的直接和持续现金救济,以减轻疫情对数百万美国人福祉的不利影响,包括弱势少数群体和低收入人群。