Suppr超能文献

无影像机器人辅助 UKA 至 TKA 翻修术:与初次机器人 TKA 的手术技术及病例对照研究。

Imageless robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from UKA to TKA : Surgical technique and case-control study compared with primary robotic TKA.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Diakovere Annastift, Anna von Borries Str. 1-6, 30625, Hannover, Germany.

London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Acton Lane Park Royal, London, UK.

出版信息

Orthopade. 2021 Dec;50(12):1018-1025. doi: 10.1007/s00132-021-04182-w. Epub 2021 Oct 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

It is evident from the national joint registries that numbers of revision knee arthroplasty operations are rising. The aim of this article is to introduce a new robotic-assisted approach in UKA to TKA revision arthroplasty and investigate the alignment accuracy, implant component use and surgery time and to compare it to primary robotic-assisted TKA arthroplasty.

METHODS

This retrospective, case-control study included patients undergoing image-less robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from UKA to TKA (n = 20) and patients undergoing image-less robotic-assisted primary TKA (control group, n = 20) from 11/2018 to 07/2020. The control group was matched based on the BMI and natural alignment. Comparison of groups was based on postoperative alignment, outlier rate, tibial insert size, lateral bone resection depth, incision-to-wound closure time. All surgeries were performed by a single senior surgeon using the same bi-cruciate stabilizing TKA system. Statistical analysis consisted of parametric t‑testing and Fisher's exact test with a level of significance of p < 0.05.

RESULTS

The two groups showed no differences in mean BMI, natural alignment (p > 0.05) and mean overall limb alignment. No outlier was found for OLA and slope analysis. The smallest insert size (9 mm) was used in 70% of the cases in the revision group (n = 14) and in 90% of the cases in the primary group (n = 18, p = 0.24), distal femoral and tibial resection depth showed no statistical difference (p > 0.05). The incision to wound closure time was longer in the revision group but showed no significant difference.

CONCLUSION

Image-less robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from UKA to TKA showed a comparable surgery time, and alignment accuracy in comparison to primary robotic-assisted TKA. Comparable bone preservation and subsequent tibial insert size use was observed for both groups.

摘要

背景与目的

国家联合登记处的数据表明,膝关节翻修手术的数量正在增加。本文旨在介绍一种新的机器人辅助 UKA 至 TKA 翻修关节置换术的方法,并研究其对线准确性、植入物组件的使用以及手术时间,并与原发性机器人辅助 TKA 关节置换术进行比较。

方法

本回顾性病例对照研究纳入了 2018 年 11 月至 2020 年 7 月期间接受无影像机器人辅助翻修术(从 UKA 到 TKA)的患者(n=20)和接受无影像机器人辅助原发性 TKA(对照组,n=20)的患者。对照组根据 BMI 和自然对线进行匹配。基于术后对线、离群率、胫骨衬垫大小、外侧骨切除深度、切口至伤口关闭时间对两组进行比较。所有手术均由一位资深外科医生使用相同的双交叉稳定 TKA 系统进行。统计分析包括参数 t 检验和 Fisher 精确检验,显著性水平为 p<0.05。

结果

两组在平均 BMI、自然对线(p>0.05)和平均整体肢体对线方面无差异。在 OLA 和斜率分析中没有发现离群值。在翻修组中,70%的病例(n=14)使用了最小的衬垫尺寸(9mm),而在原发性组中,90%的病例(n=18,p=0.24)使用了最小的衬垫尺寸,股骨远端和胫骨切除深度无统计学差异(p>0.05)。翻修组的切口至伤口关闭时间较长,但无显著差异。

结论

与原发性机器人辅助 TKA 相比,无影像机器人辅助 UKA 至 TKA 翻修术的手术时间和对线准确性相当。两组均观察到相似的骨保留和随后胫骨衬垫尺寸的使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e910/8642254/39c2f0f1fdde/132_2021_4182_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验