Suppr超能文献

无影像机器人辅助全膝关节置换术的体内准确性:一项测量术后骨切除和对线的回顾性研究。

Imageless robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty is accurate in vivo: a retrospective study to measure the postoperative bone resection and alignment.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sana Kliniken Sommerfeld, Waldhausstr. 44, 16766, Kremmen, Germany.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jun;143(6):3471-3479. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04648-2. Epub 2022 Oct 21.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Conventional instruments for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have limited accuracy. The occurrence of outliers can negatively influence the clinical outcome and long-term survival of the implant. Orthopaedic robotic systems were developed to increase the accuracy of implant positioning and bone resections. Several systems requiring preoperative imaging have shown a higher degree of precision compared to conventional instrumentation. An imageless system needs less preoperative time and preparation and is more cost effective. Aim of this study was to find out whether this system is as precise, reproduces accurately the surgeon's planning and reduces the occurrence of outliers.

METHODS

This retrospective study included the first 71 robotic-assisted TKA and 308 conventional TKA in 374 patients. Intraoperatively planned and actual bone resections were compared. Postoperative alignment, measured on full leg weight bearing radiographs, was related to the respective planning and statistically compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics (age, BMI, ASA, preoperative Knee Society Score and deformity) between both groups were comparable. According to the planned alignment, the postoperative mean difference was - 1.01° in the robotic versus 2.05° in the conventional group. The maximum deviation was - 2/+ 2.5° in the robotic and - 6.6/ + 6.8° in the conventional group. According to the plan, there were no outliers above ± 3° in the robotic versus 24% in the conventional group. The mean difference between planned and measured bone resection was 0.21 mm with a maximum of 2 mm. The 95% confidence interval was at each position 1 mm or below.

CONCLUSIONS

The described imageless robotic system is accurate in terms of coronal alignment and bone resections. In precision, it is superior to conventional instrumentation and could therefore be used to evaluate new alignment concepts.

摘要

目的

传统的全膝关节置换术(TKA)器械准确性有限。离群值的出现会对植入物的临床结果和长期存活率产生负面影响。骨科机器人系统的开发是为了提高植入物定位和骨切除的准确性。与传统器械相比,一些需要术前成像的系统显示出更高的精度。无图像系统需要较少的术前时间和准备,并且更具成本效益。本研究旨在确定该系统是否具有相同的精度,是否准确复制外科医生的计划,并减少离群值的发生。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入了 374 名患者的 71 例机器人辅助 TKA 和 308 例常规 TKA。比较了术中计划和实际的骨切除。术后在完全负重下肢放射照片上测量的对线与相应的计划进行比较,并对两组进行统计学比较。

结果

两组患者的基线特征(年龄、BMI、ASA、术前膝关节协会评分和畸形)相当。根据计划的对线,机器人组的术后平均差异为-1.01°,而常规组为 2.05°。机器人组的最大偏差为-2/+2.5°,常规组为-6.6/+6.8°。根据计划,机器人组没有超过±3°的离群值,而常规组为 24%。计划与测量的骨切除之间的平均差异为 0.21mm,最大为 2mm。95%置信区间在每个位置都在 1mm 或以下。

结论

所描述的无图像机器人系统在冠状对线和骨切除方面具有准确性。在精度方面,它优于传统器械,因此可用于评估新的对线概念。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验