• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

智能城市环境中的动力学值、移动性(不)平等与老龄化

Kinetic Values, Mobility (in)equalities, and Ageing in Smart Urban Environments.

作者信息

Parviainen Jaana

机构信息

Faculty of Social Sciences (SOC), Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.

出版信息

Ethical Theory Moral Pract. 2021;24(5):1139-1153. doi: 10.1007/s10677-021-10249-6. Epub 2021 Oct 28.

DOI:10.1007/s10677-021-10249-6
PMID:34725542
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8551938/
Abstract

The idea of the right to mobility has been fundamental to modern Western citizenship and is expressed in many legal and government documents. Although there is widespread acceptance regarding the importance of mobility in older adults, there have been few attempts to develop ethical and theoretical tools to portray mobility (in)equalities in old age. This paper develops a novel conceptualisation of kinetic values focusing on older adults whose ability to move has been restricted for internal and external reasons. Informed by the phenomenological theory of kinaesthesia, I suggest that kinetic values are related to four principal dimensions: self-motion, being-moved, co-motion, and forced movement. I assume that these dimensions can address the key dilemma of human dignity among older adults who suffer from losing their autonomy and agency through their mobility impairments and who are at risk of being confined to their homes. To concretise the formulation of kinetic values, I study movement as part of technological equipment and urban infrastructure to examine what kinds of kinetic values mobility services and assistive robots convey for older adults in smart urban environments. By bridging disciplines, the phenomenological approach provides a novel understanding of mobility and the interplay among assistive technologies, kinaesthesia, and urban technological infrastructure. The approach suggests that kinetic values should be interpreted more comprehensively so that kinaesthesia can become better identified as a positive life-promoting practice.

摘要

行动权的理念一直是现代西方公民身份的核心,并在许多法律和政府文件中有所体现。尽管人们普遍认可行动能力对老年人的重要性,但很少有人尝试开发伦理和理论工具来描述老年人行动方面的平等与不平等。本文提出了一种关于动能价值的全新概念,重点关注那些因内部和外部原因行动能力受到限制的老年人。基于动觉现象学理论,我认为动能价值与四个主要维度相关:自我移动、被移动、共同移动和强制移动。我假定这些维度能够解决老年人尊严面临的关键困境,这些老年人因行动障碍而失去自主性和能动性,面临被困家中的风险。为了具体阐述动能价值的构成,我将移动视为技术设备和城市基础设施的一部分来研究,以考察在智能城市环境中,移动服务和辅助机器人为老年人传递了何种动能价值。通过跨学科研究,现象学方法为移动以及辅助技术、动觉和城市技术基础设施之间的相互作用提供了全新的理解。该方法表明,应更全面地解读动能价值,以便能更好地将动觉识别为一种促进积极生活的实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bdf/8551938/4f7a52c4a524/10677_2021_10249_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bdf/8551938/4f7a52c4a524/10677_2021_10249_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bdf/8551938/4f7a52c4a524/10677_2021_10249_Figa_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Kinetic Values, Mobility (in)equalities, and Ageing in Smart Urban Environments.智能城市环境中的动力学值、移动性(不)平等与老龄化
Ethical Theory Moral Pract. 2021;24(5):1139-1153. doi: 10.1007/s10677-021-10249-6. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
2
Mobility in older adults: a comprehensive framework.老年人的活动能力:一个综合框架。
Gerontologist. 2010 Aug;50(4):443-50. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnq013. Epub 2010 Feb 9.
3
Let's Walk It: Mobility and the Perceived Quality of Life in Older Adults.“让我们动起来:老年人的身体活动能力与生活质量感知”
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 2;18(21):11515. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111515.
4
Co-designing Urban Living Solutions to Improve Older People's Mobility and Well-Being.共同设计城市生活解决方案,以提高老年人的流动性和幸福感。
J Urban Health. 2018 Jun;95(3):409-422. doi: 10.1007/s11524-018-0232-z.
5
Ethics and acceptance of smart homes for older adults.老年人智能家居的伦理与接受度。
Inform Health Soc Care. 2022 Jan 2;47(1):10-37. doi: 10.1080/17538157.2021.1923500. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
6
MAPx (Mobility Aid Personalization): examining why older adults "pimp their ride" and the impact of doing so.MAPx(移动辅助个性化):探究老年人为何“改装他们的助行工具”以及这样做的影响。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017 Jul;12(5):512-518. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2016.1158327. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
7
Dignity, Autonomy, and Style of Company: Dimensions Older Adults Consider for Robot Companions.尊严、自主性与陪伴风格:老年人对机器人伴侣的考量维度
Proc ACM Hum Comput Interact. 2021 Apr;5. doi: 10.1145/3449178.
8
Destinations matter: The association between where older adults live and their travel behavior.目的地很重要:老年人居住地点与其出行行为之间的关联。
J Transp Health. 2015 Mar;2(1):50-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2014.09.008.
9
An entropy-based approach to the study of human mobility and behavior in private homes.基于熵的方法研究私人住宅中的人类移动性和行为。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 10;15(12):e0243503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243503. eCollection 2020.
10
ETHICS OF SMART HOUSE WELFARE TECHNOLOGY FOR OLDER ADULTS: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW.智能居家养老技术的伦理问题:系统文献回顾。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017 Jan;33(6):691-699. doi: 10.1017/S0266462317000964. Epub 2017 Nov 20.

本文引用的文献

1
COVID-19, Inter-household Contact and Mental Well-Being Among Older Adults in the US and the UK.美国和英国老年人中的新冠病毒疾病、家庭间接触与心理健康
Front Sociol. 2021 Jul 26;6:714626. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.714626. eCollection 2021.
2
Older people's early experience of household isolation and social distancing during COVID-19.老年人在 COVID-19 期间早期经历的家庭隔离和社交距离措施。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Nov;29(21-22):4387-4402. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15485. Epub 2020 Sep 13.
3
Managing Mental Health in Pandemic COVID-19 and Movement Control Order.
在新冠疫情大流行及行动管制令期间管理心理健康
Malays J Med Sci. 2020 Jul;27(4):147-153. doi: 10.21315/mjms2020.27.4.14. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
4
"Benches become like porches": Built and social environment influences on older adults' experiences of mobility and well-being.“长椅变得如同门廊”:建筑与社会环境对老年人出行体验和幸福感的影响
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Nov;169:33-41. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.08.044. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
5
Overview and Categorization of Robots Supporting Independent Living of Elderly People: What Activities Do They Support and How Far Have They Developed.支持老年人独立生活的机器人概述与分类:它们支持哪些活动以及发展到了什么程度。
Assist Technol. 2015 Summer;27(2):88-100. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2014.978916.
6
Are movements necessary for the sense of body ownership? Evidence from the rubber hand illusion in pure hemiplegic patients.身体所有权感是否需要运动?来自纯偏瘫患者橡皮手错觉的证据。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 16;10(3):e0117155. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117155. eCollection 2015.
7
Mobility in older adults: a comprehensive framework.老年人的活动能力:一个综合框架。
Gerontologist. 2010 Aug;50(4):443-50. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnq013. Epub 2010 Feb 9.
8
Revisiting the biomedicalization of aging: clinical trends and ethical challenges.重新审视衰老的生物医学化:临床趋势与伦理挑战
Gerontologist. 2004 Dec;44(6):731-8. doi: 10.1093/geront/44.6.731.
9
Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science.自我的哲学概念:对认知科学的启示
Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Jan;4(1):14-21. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01417-5.
10
The biomedicalization of aging: dangers and dilemmas.衰老的生物医学化:风险与困境
Gerontologist. 1989 Oct;29(5):587-96. doi: 10.1093/geront/29.5.587.