• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

量化2019冠状病毒病大流行在2020年美国总统选举中的作用。

Quantifying the role of the COVID-19 pandemic in the 2020 U.S. presidential elections.

作者信息

De Lellis Pietro, Ruiz Marín Manuel, Porfiri Maurizio

机构信息

Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, University of Naples Federico II, 80125 Naples, Italy.

Department of Quantitative Methods, Law and Modern Languages, Technical University of Cartagena, 30201 Cartagena, Murcia Spain.

出版信息

Eur Phys J Spec Top. 2022;231(9):1635-1643. doi: 10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00299-3. Epub 2021 Oct 28.

DOI:10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00299-3
PMID:34725567
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8552435/
Abstract

In the media, a prevalent narrative is that the incumbent United States President Donald J. Trump lost the 2020 elections because of the way he handled the COVID-19 pandemic. Quantitative evidence to support this narrative is, however, limited. We put forward a spatial, information-theoretic approach to critically examine the link between voting behavior and COVID-19 incidence in the 2020 presidential elections. The approach overcomes classical limitations of traditional regression analysis, where it does not require an underlying mathematical model and it can capture nonlinear interactions. From the analysis of county-level data, we uncovered a robust association between voting behavior and prevalence of COVID-19 cases. Surprisingly, such an association points in the opposite direction from the accepted narrative: in counties that experienced less COVID-19 cases, the incumbent President lost more ground to his opponent, now President Joseph R. Biden Jr. A tenable explanation of this observation is the different attitude of liberal and conservative voters toward the pandemic, which led to more COVID-19 spreading in counties with a larger share of republican voters.

摘要

在媒体上,一种普遍的说法是,现任美国总统唐纳德·J·特朗普输掉2020年大选是因为他应对新冠疫情的方式。然而,支持这一说法的量化证据有限。我们提出一种基于空间信息论的方法,以批判性地审视2020年总统选举中投票行为与新冠疫情发病率之间的联系。该方法克服了传统回归分析的经典局限性,它不需要潜在的数学模型,并且能够捕捉非线性相互作用。通过对县级数据的分析,我们发现投票行为与新冠病例流行率之间存在紧密关联。令人惊讶的是,这种关联指向的方向与普遍说法相反:在新冠病例较少的县,现任总统输给对手、即现任总统小约瑟夫·R·拜登的幅度更大。对这一观察结果的一个合理的解释是,自由派和保守派选民对疫情的态度不同,这导致在共和党选民占比更大的县,新冠疫情传播得更厉害。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e41f/8552435/e35dfb186574/11734_2021_299_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e41f/8552435/1e8c65479d91/11734_2021_299_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e41f/8552435/22775f0d756f/11734_2021_299_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e41f/8552435/1898d4bbf61d/11734_2021_299_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e41f/8552435/2280fe916d52/11734_2021_299_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e41f/8552435/e35dfb186574/11734_2021_299_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e41f/8552435/1e8c65479d91/11734_2021_299_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e41f/8552435/22775f0d756f/11734_2021_299_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e41f/8552435/1898d4bbf61d/11734_2021_299_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e41f/8552435/2280fe916d52/11734_2021_299_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e41f/8552435/e35dfb186574/11734_2021_299_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Quantifying the role of the COVID-19 pandemic in the 2020 U.S. presidential elections.量化2019冠状病毒病大流行在2020年美国总统选举中的作用。
Eur Phys J Spec Top. 2022;231(9):1635-1643. doi: 10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00299-3. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
2
Nail in the Coffin or Lifeline? Evaluating the Electoral Impact of COVID-19 on President Trump in the 2020 Election.棺材上的钉子还是生命线?评估新冠疫情对特朗普总统在2020年大选中的选举影响。
Polit Behav. 2022 Oct 23:1-29. doi: 10.1007/s11109-022-09826-x.
3
The COVID-19 pandemic and the 2020 US presidential election.2019冠状病毒病大流行与2020年美国总统选举。
J Popul Econ. 2021;34(2):739-767. doi: 10.1007/s00148-020-00820-3. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
4
Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.迈向政治发展科学。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2019 Sep;84(3):7-185. doi: 10.1111/mono.12410.
5
Life expectancy and voting patterns in the 2020 U.S. presidential election.2020年美国总统大选中的预期寿命与投票模式。
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Jun 8;15:100840. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100840. eCollection 2021 Sep.
6
Did Covid-19 Kill Trump Politically? The Pandemic and Voting in the 2020 Presidential Election.新冠疫情是否在政治上“杀死”了特朗普?疫情与2020年总统大选投票情况
Soc Sci Q. 2021 Sep;102(5):2194-2209. doi: 10.1111/ssqu.12992. Epub 2021 May 25.
7
Electoral College bias and the 2020 presidential election.选举团制度的偏见与 2020 年总统大选
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Nov 10;117(45):27940-27944. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2013581117. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
8
County community health associations of net voting shift in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.2016年美国总统大选中县社区卫生协会的净投票转向情况。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 2;12(10):e0185051. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185051. eCollection 2017.
9
The abortion issue in the 1984 elections.1984年选举中的堕胎问题。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1987 Mar-Apr;19(2):59-62.
10
(Un)happiness and voting in U.S. presidential elections.(不)幸福与美国总统选举投票。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021 Feb;120(2):370-383. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000249. Epub 2020 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Complex urban systems: a living lab to understand urban processes and solve complex urban problems.复杂城市系统:一个理解城市进程并解决复杂城市问题的生活实验室。
Eur Phys J Spec Top. 2022;231(9):1595-1597. doi: 10.1140/epjs/s11734-022-00581-y. Epub 2022 May 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk perception and optimism during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.2019冠状病毒病大流行早期的风险认知与乐观情绪。
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Nov 10;8(11):210904. doi: 10.1098/rsos.210904. eCollection 2021 Nov.
2
The COVID-19 pandemic and the 2020 US presidential election.2019冠状病毒病大流行与2020年美国总统选举。
J Popul Econ. 2021;34(2):739-767. doi: 10.1007/s00148-020-00820-3. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
3
An information-theoretic approach to study spatial dependencies in small datasets.一种用于研究小数据集中空间依赖性的信息论方法。
Proc Math Phys Eng Sci. 2020 Oct;476(2242):20200113. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2020.0113. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
4
A red mirage-Did the association of the 2016 presidential election results with the COVID-19 epidemic magically disappear in 2020?一个红色幻影——2016年总统选举结果与新冠疫情之间的关联在2020年神奇地消失了吗?
J Med Virol. 2021 Jul;93(7):4071-4075. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26682. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
5
Time, space and social interactions: exit mechanisms for the Covid-19 epidemics.时间、空间和社会互动:Covid-19 疫情的退出机制。
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 13;10(1):13764. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70631-9.
6
Functional Fear Predicts Public Health Compliance in the COVID-19 Pandemic.功能性恐惧可预测新冠疫情期间的公共卫生合规情况。
Int J Ment Health Addict. 2021;19(5):1875-1888. doi: 10.1007/s11469-020-00281-5. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
7
Symbolic transfer entropy reveals the age structure of pandemic influenza transmission from high-volume influenza-like illness data.符号转移熵从大量流感样疾病数据中揭示了大流行性流感传播的年龄结构。
J R Soc Interface. 2020 Mar;17(164):20190628. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2019.0628. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
8
Media coverage and firearm acquisition in the aftermath of a mass shooting.大众枪击事件后的媒体报道与枪支获取。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Sep;3(9):913-921. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0636-0. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
9
Regional Sustainable Development Analysis Based on Information Entropy-Sichuan Province as an Example.基于信息熵的区域可持续发展分析——以四川省为例
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Oct 13;14(10):1219. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14101219.
10
Urban Transfer Entropy across Scales.跨尺度的城市转移熵
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 24;10(7):e0133780. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133780. eCollection 2015.