Kissler Stephen M, Viboud Cécile, Grenfell Bryan T, Gog Julia R
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge, UK.
Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
J R Soc Interface. 2020 Mar;17(164):20190628. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2019.0628. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
Existing methods to infer the relative roles of age groups in epidemic transmission can normally only accommodate a few age classes, and/or require data that are highly specific for the disease being studied. Here, symbolic transfer entropy (STE), a measure developed to identify asymmetric transfer of information between stochastic processes, is presented as a way to reveal asymmetric transmission patterns between age groups in an epidemic. STE provides a ranking of which age groups may dominate transmission, rather than a reconstruction of the explicit between-age-group transmission matrix. Using simulations, we establish that STE can identify which age groups dominate transmission even when there are differences in reporting rates between age groups and even if the data are noisy. Then, the pairwise STE is calculated between time series of influenza-like illness for 12 age groups in 884 US cities during the autumn of 2009. Elevated STE from 5 to 19 year-olds indicates that school-aged children were likely the most important transmitters of infection during the autumn wave of the 2009 pandemic in the USA. The results may be partially confounded by higher rates of physician-seeking behaviour in children compared to adults, but it is unlikely that differences in reporting rates can explain the observed differences in STE.
现有的推断年龄组在疫情传播中相对作用的方法通常只能容纳少数几个年龄类别,和/或需要针对所研究疾病的高度特定的数据。在此,符号转移熵(STE)作为一种揭示疫情中年龄组间不对称传播模式的方法被提出,它是一种用于识别随机过程间信息不对称转移的量度。STE提供了一个关于哪些年龄组可能主导传播的排名,而不是对明确的年龄组间传播矩阵进行重构。通过模拟,我们确定即使年龄组之间的报告率存在差异且数据存在噪声,STE也能识别出哪些年龄组主导传播。然后,计算了2009年秋季美国884个城市中12个年龄组的流感样疾病时间序列之间的成对STE。5至19岁年龄组的STE升高表明,在2009年美国大流行秋季波期间,学龄儿童可能是最重要的感染传播者。与成人相比,儿童寻求医疗行为的发生率较高可能会使结果部分混淆,但报告率的差异不太可能解释观察到的STE差异。