School of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Thammasat University, Khong Luang, Thailand.
Logistics Analytics and Supply Chain Management Program, International College, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand.
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 5;16(11):e0259298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259298. eCollection 2021.
This paper explored the occurrence of food fraud and adulterations (FFA) in exports from the Association of South- East Asia Nations (ASEAN), with implications on food chain and international trade. Data from European Union Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed (EU RASFF) about FFA notifications on ASEAN exports for a period of 20 years (2000-2020) were extracted and analyzed. Results from this study revealed that of all ten ASEAN member countries, seven had cases of FFA notified in the database with Thailand (n = 47, 32%) and the Philippines (n = 37, 26%) receiving the highest frequency of notifications in the region. There was a statistical significance difference in frequency of notifications received on products from these seven countries with herbs and spices ranking highest (n = 22, 15%). Highest notifications of FFA on ASEAN exports came from the United Kingdom (n = 31, 21%). All the seven countries experienced border rejections and consequent destruction of food products especially on exports from Indonesia where 95% of product with FFA were border rejected. Border rejections on products from these countries were significantly different. Therefore, a thorough implementation system, appropriate testing and constantly updating each country's FFA database could aid actions in curtailing future events.
本文探讨了东南亚国家联盟(ASEAN)出口食品掺假和欺诈(FFA)的发生情况,以及其对食物链和国际贸易的影响。本研究从欧盟食品和饲料快速预警系统(EU RASFF)中提取并分析了 20 年来(2000-2020 年)关于 ASEAN 出口食品掺假通知的数据。研究结果显示,在所有十个 ASEAN 成员国中,有七个国家在数据库中通报了 FFA 案例,其中泰国(n = 47,32%)和菲律宾(n = 37,26%)在该地区收到的通报频率最高。这七个国家的产品收到的通报频率存在统计学差异,其中草药和香料的通报数量最高(n = 22,15%)。来自英国的 ASEAN 出口食品掺假通报数量最高(n = 31,21%)。所有七个国家都经历了边境拒收和随后销毁食品产品的情况,特别是在印度尼西亚,95%的 FFA 产品都被边境拒收。这些国家的产品边境拒收情况存在显著差异。因此,彻底实施系统、适当的测试以及不断更新每个国家的 FFA 数据库,可以有助于采取行动遏制未来的事件。