Rhodes College, Department of Psychology, 2000 North Parkway, Memphis, TN 38104, USA.
Wagner College, Department of Psychology, 1 Campus Rd., Staten Island, NY 10301, USA.
Physiol Behav. 2022 Jan 1;243:113638. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113638. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
Group data means from individuals who self-assess as emotional eaters do not reliably show increased food intake in response to stress or negative emotions. This inconsistency in predictive validity of self-reported emotional eating (EE) could be attributable to unconsidered moderation of the relationship between self-reported EE and behavioral measures of EE. Greater emotional relief from stress by eating may provide enhanced negative reinforcement and promote future EE in response to stress as a form of self-medication. Thus, we predicted that greater emotional relief from stress by eating (decrease in negative affect from stress to post-eating) would moderate the extent to which heightened stress reactivity (measured by systolic blood pressure, SBP) moderates the relationship between self-reported EE and food intake post-stress. We also hypothesized that self-reported EE would not predict greater food consumption on the rest day. 43 undergraduate women completed online assessments of eating behaviors. Participants were given snacks to eat after a mental stress task (TSST) or rest period on separate days in counterbalanced order. Our prediction was supported, as the moderated moderation model (PROCESS model 3) was highly significant on the stress day. Self-reported EE predicted increased food intake post-stress only under conditions of high stress reactivity and high emotional relief. On the rest day, self-reported EE predicted greater snack food intake only when SBP was high. This conditional increased intake substantiates stress as a promoter of snack food consumption for women with greater EE. Overall, our findings identified factors that may distinguish the subset of self-reported emotional eaters who are more likely to display EE behaviors in a laboratory setting, yet further studies are needed to directly test whether negative reinforcement via emotional relief from stress by eating drives enhanced EE following stress.
群体数据表明,自我评估为情绪化进食者的个体在面对压力或负面情绪时,其食物摄入量并不会可靠地增加。自我报告的情绪化进食(EE)的预测效度存在不一致性,这可能归因于未考虑到自我报告的 EE 与 EE 的行为测量之间关系的调节作用。通过进食缓解压力可能会产生更大的情绪缓解,从而增强负面强化,并促进未来对压力的 EE 作为一种自我治疗形式。因此,我们预测通过进食缓解压力的程度(压力后负面情绪的减少)会调节压力反应性(通过收缩压 SBP 测量)对自我报告的 EE 与压力后食物摄入之间关系的调节作用。我们还假设自我报告的 EE 不会预测休息日后的食物摄入量更大。43 名女大学生完成了在线饮食行为评估。参与者在精神压力任务(TSST)或休息期后在不同的日子里以平衡的方式分别进食零食。我们的预测得到了支持,因为在压力日,调节调节模型(PROCESS 模型 3)非常显著。只有在高压力反应性和高情绪缓解的情况下,自我报告的 EE 才预测压力后食物摄入量增加。在休息日,只有 SBP 高时,自我报告的 EE 才预测零食摄入量增加。这种条件性的摄入量增加证明了压力是促进 EE 行为的因素,特别是对于那些 EE 较高的女性。总的来说,我们的发现确定了一些因素,这些因素可能可以区分在实验室环境中更有可能表现出 EE 行为的自我报告的情绪化进食者子集,但还需要进一步的研究来直接测试通过进食缓解压力产生的负面强化是否会促进应激后增强的 EE。