• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估身体活动类型检测模型的可转移性:年龄组的影响未得到充分重视。

Assessing the Transferability of Physical Activity Type Detection Models: Influence of Age Group Is Underappreciated.

作者信息

Allahbakhshi Hoda, Röcke Christina, Weibel Robert

机构信息

Department of Geography, University of Zurich (UZH), Zurich, Switzerland.

Digital Society Initiative, UZH, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Front Physiol. 2021 Oct 22;12:738939. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.738939. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fphys.2021.738939
PMID:34744780
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8569407/
Abstract

Increasing the amount of physical activity (PA) in older adults that have shifted to a sedentary lifestyle is a determining factor in decreasing health and social costs. It is, therefore, imperative to develop objective methods that accurately detect daily PA types and provide detailed PA guidance for healthy aging. Most of the existing techniques have been applied in the younger generation or validated in the laboratory. To what extent, these methods are transferable to real-life and older adults are a question that this paper aims to answer. Sixty-three participants, including 33 younger and 30 older healthy adults, participated in our study. Each participant wore five devices mounted on the left and right hips, right knee, chest, and left pocket and collected accelerometer and GPS data in both semi-structured and real-life environments. Using this dataset, we developed machine-learning models to detect PA types walking, non-level walking, jogging/running, sitting, standing, and lying. Besides, we examined the accuracy of the models within-and between-age groups applying different scenarios and validation approaches. The within-age models showed convincing classification results. The findings indicate that due to age-related behavioral differences, there are more confusion errors between walking, non-level walking, and running in older adults' results. Using semi-structured training data, the younger adults' models outperformed older adults' models. However, using real-life training data alone or in combination with semi-structured data generated better results for older adults who had high real-life data quality. Assessing the transferability of the models to older adults showed that the models trained with younger adults' data were only weakly transferable. However, training the models with a combined dataset of both age groups led to reliable transferability of results to the data of the older subgroup. We show that age-related behavioral differences can alter the PA classification performance. We demonstrate that PA type detection models that rely on combined datasets of young and older adults are strongly transferable to real-life and older adults' data. Our results yield significant time and cost savings for future PA studies by reducing the overall volume of training data required.

摘要

增加已转向久坐生活方式的老年人的身体活动(PA)量是降低健康和社会成本的一个决定性因素。因此,开发能够准确检测日常PA类型并为健康老龄化提供详细PA指导的客观方法势在必行。现有的大多数技术都应用于年轻一代或在实验室中得到验证。这些方法在多大程度上可转移到现实生活中以及老年人身上,是本文旨在回答的一个问题。63名参与者,包括33名年轻健康成年人和30名老年健康成年人,参与了我们的研究。每位参与者在左、右臀部、右膝、胸部和左口袋佩戴五个设备,并在半结构化和现实生活环境中收集加速度计和GPS数据。利用该数据集,我们开发了机器学习模型来检测PA类型,包括步行、非水平步行、慢跑/跑步、坐着、站着和躺着。此外,我们在不同场景和验证方法下,检验了模型在年龄组内和年龄组间的准确性。年龄组内模型显示出令人信服的分类结果。研究结果表明,由于与年龄相关的行为差异,老年人在步行、非水平步行和跑步结果之间存在更多混淆误差。使用半结构化训练数据时,年轻成年人的模型优于老年人的模型。然而,仅使用现实生活训练数据或与半结构化数据结合使用时,对于具有高现实生活数据质量的老年人产生了更好的结果。评估模型对老年人的可转移性表明,用年轻成年人数据训练的模型仅有较弱的可转移性。然而,用两个年龄组的组合数据集训练模型,可使结果可靠地转移到老年亚组的数据上。我们表明,与年龄相关的行为差异会改变PA分类性能。我们证明,依赖于年轻和老年成年人组合数据集的PA类型检测模型可强烈转移到现实生活和老年人的数据上。我们的结果通过减少所需训练数据的总体量,为未来的PA研究节省了大量时间和成本。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/faca/8569407/d8daa6f72f08/fphys-12-738939-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/faca/8569407/7558f45f5c9f/fphys-12-738939-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/faca/8569407/36c4cfa22bed/fphys-12-738939-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/faca/8569407/af9ed73d0278/fphys-12-738939-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/faca/8569407/efd3f789e453/fphys-12-738939-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/faca/8569407/d8daa6f72f08/fphys-12-738939-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/faca/8569407/7558f45f5c9f/fphys-12-738939-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/faca/8569407/36c4cfa22bed/fphys-12-738939-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/faca/8569407/af9ed73d0278/fphys-12-738939-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/faca/8569407/efd3f789e453/fphys-12-738939-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/faca/8569407/d8daa6f72f08/fphys-12-738939-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing the Transferability of Physical Activity Type Detection Models: Influence of Age Group Is Underappreciated.评估身体活动类型检测模型的可转移性:年龄组的影响未得到充分重视。
Front Physiol. 2021 Oct 22;12:738939. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.738939. eCollection 2021.
2
Using Accelerometer and GPS Data for Real-Life Physical Activity Type Detection.利用加速度计和 GPS 数据进行现实生活中的身体活动类型检测。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jan 21;20(3):588. doi: 10.3390/s20030588.
3
Validation of an Activity Type Recognition Model Classifying Daily Physical Behavior in Older Adults: The HAR70+ Model.验证一种活动类型识别模型,用于分类老年人的日常身体行为:HAR70+模型。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Feb 21;23(5):2368. doi: 10.3390/s23052368.
4
Relationship between neighborhood walkability and older adults' physical activity: results from the Belgian Environmental Physical Activity Study in Seniors (BEPAS Seniors).邻里步行便利性与老年人身体活动之间的关系:比利时老年人环境身体活动研究(BEPAS Seniors)的结果
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 Aug 23;11:110. doi: 10.1186/s12966-014-0110-3.
5
Daily physical activity in older adults across levels of care: the HUNT Trondheim 70 + study.不同护理水平下老年人的日常身体活动:特隆赫姆HUNT 70+研究
Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2024 Jul 17;21(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s11556-024-00355-6.
6
Older Adults' Perceptions of the Usefulness of Technologies for Engaging in Physical Activity: Using Focus Groups to Explore Physical Literacy.老年人对参与体育活动的技术有用性的看法:利用焦点小组探讨身体素养。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 11;17(4):1144. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041144.
7
Social Reminiscence in Older Adults' Everyday Conversations: Automated Detection Using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning.老年人日常对话中的社会怀旧:使用自然语言处理和机器学习的自动检测。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 15;22(9):e19133. doi: 10.2196/19133.
8
What do IPAQ questions mean to older adults? Lessons from cognitive interviews.国际体力活动问卷对老年人意味着什么?认知访谈的经验教训。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010 May 11;7:35. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-7-35.
9
Personalised Accelerometer Cut-point Prediction for Older Adults' Movement Behaviours using a Machine Learning approach.基于机器学习的老年人运动行为个性化加速度计切点预测
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021 Sep;208:106165. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106165. Epub 2021 May 18.
10
Ready to participate? Using qualitative data to typify older adults' reasons for (non-) participation in a physical activity promotion intervention.准备参与?使用定性数据来确定老年人参与(不参与)体育活动促进干预的原因类型。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Oct 22;19(1):1327. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7688-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine learning used to study risk factors for chronic diseases: A scoping review.用于研究慢性病风险因素的机器学习:一项范围综述。
Can J Public Health. 2025 Jun 11. doi: 10.17269/s41997-025-01059-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Influences of Sensor Placement Site and Subject Posture on Measurement of Respiratory Frequency Using Triaxial Accelerometers.传感器放置部位和受试者姿势对使用三轴加速度计测量呼吸频率的影响。
Front Physiol. 2020 Jul 9;11:823. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00823. eCollection 2020.
2
Reliability and Validity of the Activity Diversity Questionnaire for Older Adults in Japan.日本老年人活动多样性问卷的信度和效度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 31;17(7):2384. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072384.
3
Using Accelerometer and GPS Data for Real-Life Physical Activity Type Detection.
利用加速度计和 GPS 数据进行现实生活中的身体活动类型检测。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jan 21;20(3):588. doi: 10.3390/s20030588.
4
Sedentary Behavior, Exercise, and Cardiovascular Health.久坐行为、运动与心血管健康。
Circ Res. 2019 Mar;124(5):799-815. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.312669.
5
The Key Factors in Physical Activity Type Detection Using Real-Life Data: A Systematic Review.使用现实生活数据进行体育活动类型检测的关键因素:一项系统综述。
Front Physiol. 2019 Feb 12;10:75. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00075. eCollection 2019.
6
Relationship between subjective well-being and healthy lifestyle behaviours in older adults: a longitudinal study.老年人主观幸福感与健康生活方式行为的关系:一项纵向研究。
Aging Ment Health. 2020 Apr;24(4):611-619. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2018.1548567. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
7
Relationship between leisure time physical activity, sedentary behaviour and symptoms of depression and anxiety: evidence from a population-based sample of Canadian adolescents.闲暇时间体力活动、久坐行为与抑郁和焦虑症状的关系:来自加拿大青少年人群的基于人群的样本证据。
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 17;8(10):e021119. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021119.
8
Sedentariness and Health: Is Sedentary Behavior More Than Just Physical Inactivity?久坐与健康:久坐行为是否不仅仅是缺乏身体活动?
Front Public Health. 2018 Sep 10;6:258. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00258. eCollection 2018.
9
Classification of Daily Activities for the Elderly Using Wearable Sensors.利用可穿戴传感器对老年人日常活动进行分类。
J Healthc Eng. 2017;2017:8934816. doi: 10.1155/2017/8934816. Epub 2017 Nov 26.
10
Physical activity, quality of life and successful ageing among community-dwelling older adults.社区居住的老年人中的身体活动、生活质量和成功老龄化。
Int Nurs Rev. 2017 Sep;64(3):396-404. doi: 10.1111/inr.12397.