• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情期间工作日的自行车交通流量及事故率

Weekday bicycle traffic and crash rates during the COVID-19 pandemic.

作者信息

Monfort Samuel S, Cicchino Jessica B, Patton David

机构信息

Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, United States.

Arlington County Division of Transportation, United States.

出版信息

J Transp Health. 2021 Dec;23:101289. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2021.101289. Epub 2021 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.jth.2021.101289
PMID:34745883
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8556542/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

One of the most consequential effects of the COVID-19 lockdowns was a dramatic reduction in travel during peak hours. Transportation modes also shifted-in particular, travel by car became more rare while bicycling saw a resurgence. Given that a typical year sees the most severe bicycle crashes in peak commuter traffic, the shift toward bicycle travel that occurred in 2020 will likely have been accompanied by unique changes in rider behavior (e.g., where and when they choose to ride) as well as the frequency and severity of vehicle-bicycle crashes.

METHODS

The current study compared weekday bicycle traffic and crashes in Arlington, VA from March-December 2020 with the same period from years prior, 2013-2019. Bicycle traffic data were obtained from 16 embedded counters placed throughout the study area, in both off-road trails and on-road bike lanes.

RESULTS

We found that 2020 midday traffic nearly doubled compared to the year before, increasing from an average of 68 riders per hour to 120 (+76%). By contrast, morning traffic fell from an average of 87 riders per hour to just 45 (-49%). Change in evening traffic depended on the location of the counters: more evening bicycles were counted on off-road, multi-use trails (+6%) but fewer on on-road lanes (-27%). The changes to 2020 bicycle traffic patterns were also associated with a 28% reduction in bicycle injury crash rate per counted cyclist.

CONCLUSION

The reduced crash risk observed in 2020 was likely due in part to the reduction of morning, on-road bicycle travel, which past research has found to be particularly dangerous for riders. Conversely, the availability of multi-use off-road trails seems to have been a protective factor against bicycle-motor vehicle crash risk in the face of greater bicycle travel volume.

摘要

引言

新冠疫情封锁措施带来的最重大影响之一,是高峰时段的出行量急剧减少。交通方式也发生了转变——尤其是驾车出行变得更为罕见,而骑自行车的人数则有所回升。鉴于在典型年份中,通勤高峰时段的自行车事故最为严重,2020年向自行车出行的转变可能伴随着骑行者行为的独特变化(例如,他们选择骑行的地点和时间)以及车辆与自行车碰撞事故的频率和严重程度的变化。

方法

本研究将弗吉尼亚州阿灵顿2020年3月至12月工作日的自行车交通量和事故情况与2013 - 2019年同期进行了比较。自行车交通数据来自于分布在整个研究区域的16个嵌入式计数器,包括越野小径和道路上的自行车道。

结果

我们发现,2020年中午的交通量相比前一年几乎翻了一番,从平均每小时68名骑行者增加到120名(增长76%)。相比之下,早上的交通量从平均每小时87名骑行者降至仅45名(下降49%)。傍晚交通量的变化取决于计数器的位置:在越野多用途小径上统计到的傍晚自行车数量有所增加(增长6%),但在道路车道上的数量减少(下降27%)。2020年自行车交通模式的变化还伴随着每统计一名骑行者的自行车伤害事故率降低28%。

结论

2020年观察到的事故风险降低可能部分归因于早上道路上自行车出行量的减少,过去的研究发现这对骑行者特别危险。相反,面对更大的自行车出行量,多用途越野小径的存在似乎是降低自行车与机动车碰撞风险的一个保护因素。

相似文献

1
Weekday bicycle traffic and crash rates during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间工作日的自行车交通流量及事故率
J Transp Health. 2021 Dec;23:101289. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2021.101289. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
2
Bicycling crash characteristics: An in-depth crash investigation study.自行车碰撞特征:一项深入的碰撞调查研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Nov;96:219-227. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.012. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
3
Roles of infrastructure and land use in bicycle crash exposure and frequency: A case study using Greater London bike sharing data.基础设施和土地利用在自行车碰撞暴露和频率中的作用:使用大伦敦自行车共享数据的案例研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Sep;144:105652. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105652. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
4
Development of German pedelec (and bicycle) crashes between 2013 and 2021.2013 年至 2021 年德国电动助力自行车(和自行车)事故的发展情况。
J Safety Res. 2023 Dec;87:187-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2023.09.016. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
5
Traffic conflicts involving speed-pedelecs (fast electric bicycles): A naturalistic riding study.涉及速度助力自行车(快速电动自行车)的交通冲突:自然骑行研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Aug;158:106201. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106201. Epub 2021 May 27.
6
Scenarios of crashes involving light mopeds on urban bicycle paths.涉及城市自行车道上轻型助力车的碰撞场景。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Aug;129:334-341. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.05.016. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
7
Bicycle Rider Behavior and Crash Involvement in Australia.澳大利亚自行车骑行者行为与撞车事故
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 1;18(5):2378. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052378.
8
Road crash fatality rates in France: a comparison of road user types, taking account of travel practices.法国道路交通事故死亡率:考虑出行方式的道路使用者类型比较
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Feb;75:217-25. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.10.025. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
9
Factors influencing the injury severity of single-bicycle crashes.影响单辆自行车事故伤害严重程度的因素。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Jan;149:105875. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105875. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
10
On-road bicycle facilities and bicycle crashes in Iowa, 2007-2010.2007-2010 年爱荷华州道路自行车设施与自行车事故分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Jul;56:103-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.031. Epub 2013 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Driving under viral impairment: Linking acute SARS-CoV-2 infections to elevated car crash risks.病毒感染导致的驾驶能力受损:将急性SARS-CoV-2感染与车祸风险升高联系起来。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Apr 8;5(4):e0004420. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004420. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessing and improving active travel around urban hospitals: A case of Xiangya hospital, China.评估与改善城市医院周边的主动出行:以中国湘雅医院为例。
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 9;9(9):e19900. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19900. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
Study on slow traffic evaluation method of large hospitals in old urban areas based on Extentics.

本文引用的文献

1
Observed impacts of the Covid-19 first wave on travel behaviour in Switzerland based on a large GPS panel.基于大型全球定位系统面板观察到的新冠疫情第一波对瑞士出行行为的影响。
Transp Policy (Oxf). 2021 Apr;104:43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.01.009. Epub 2021 Feb 14.
2
The link between bike sharing and subway use during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case-study of New York's Citi Bike.新冠疫情期间共享单车与地铁使用之间的联系:纽约花旗单车的案例研究
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 Jul;6:100166. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100166. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
3
Mobility Patterns Before, During, and Anticipated After the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Opportunity to Nurture Bicycling.
基于可拓学的老城区大型医院慢行交通评价方法研究
Procedia Comput Sci. 2022;214:528-537. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.11.208. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
4
Road crash risk prediction during COVID-19 for flash crowd traffic prevention: The case of Los Angeles.COVID-19期间道路碰撞风险预测以预防人群聚集交通:以洛杉矶为例。
Comput Commun. 2023 Jan 15;198:195-205. doi: 10.1016/j.comcom.2022.12.002. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
5
Injury mortality and morbidity changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.由于 COVID-19 大流行,美国的伤害死亡率和发病率变化。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 2;10:1001567. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1001567. eCollection 2022.
6
Impact of Covid-19 on the global orthopaedic research output.新冠疫情对全球骨科研究成果的影响。
Front Surg. 2022 Jul 28;9:962844. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.962844. eCollection 2022.
新冠疫情前后的出行模式:培养骑行习惯的契机
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Jun;60(6):e277-e279. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.01.011. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
4
COVID-19 street reallocation in mid-sized Canadian cities: socio-spatial equity patterns.中等规模加拿大城市的 COVID-19 街道重新分配:社会空间公平模式。
Can J Public Health. 2021 Jun;112(3):376-390. doi: 10.17269/s41997-020-00467-3. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
5
How did outdoor biking and walking change during COVID-19?: A case study of three U.S. cities.新冠疫情期间户外骑行和步行活动如何变化?:三个美国城市的案例研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 20;16(1):e0245514. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245514. eCollection 2021.
6
Social distancing and COVID-19: an unprecedented active transport public health opportunity.社交距离与新冠疫情:一个前所未有的积极出行公共卫生机遇。
Br J Sports Med. 2021 Apr;55(8):411-412. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102856. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
7
Coronavirus disease 2019: What could be the effects on Road safety?新型冠状病毒肺炎 2019:对道路安全可能产生哪些影响?
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Sep;144:105687. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105687. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
8
Adolescent driving behavior before and during restrictions related to COVID-19.青少年在与 COVID-19 相关限制之前和期间的驾驶行为。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Sep;144:105686. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105686. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
9
Not all protected bike lanes are the same: Infrastructure and risk of cyclist collisions and falls leading to emergency department visits in three U.S. cities.并非所有的自行车道都一样:美国三个城市的基础设施与自行车碰撞和摔倒风险以及导致前往急诊科就诊的关系。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Jun;141:105490. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105490. Epub 2020 May 6.
10
On the effect of networks of cycle-tracks on the risk of cycling. The case of Seville.关于自行车道网络对骑行风险的影响。以塞维利亚为例。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 May;102:181-190. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Mar 16.