Departments of Orthopaedics and Family Medicine, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Emory Sports Medicine Center, Johns Creek, Georgia.
Sports Health. 2022 Jan-Feb;14(1):142-153. doi: 10.1177/19417381211056088. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
Most available data on athletic development training models focus on adult or professional athletes, where increasing workload capacity and performance is a primary goal. Development pathways in youth athletes generally emphasize multisport participation rather than sport specialization to optimize motor skill acquisition and to minimize injury risk. Other models emphasize the need for accumulation of sport- and skill-specific hours to develop elite-level status. Despite recommendations against sport specialization, many youth athletes still specialize and need guidance on training and competition. Medical and sport professionals also recommend progressive, gradual increases in workloads to enhance resilience to the demands of high-level competition. There is no accepted model of risk stratification and return to play for training a specialized youth athlete through periods of injury and maturation. In this review, we present individualized training models for specialized youth athletes that (1) prioritize performance for healthy, resilient youth athletes and (2) are adaptable through vulnerable maturational periods and injury.
Nonsystematic review with critical appraisal of existing literature.
Clinical review.
Level 4.
A number of factors must be considered when developing training programs for young athletes: (1) the effect of sport specialization on athlete development and injury, (2) biological maturation, (3) motor and coordination deficits in specialized youth athletes, and (4) workload progressions and response to load.
Load-sensitive athletes with multiple risk factors may need medical evaluation, frequent monitoring, and a program designed to restore local tissue and sport-specific capacity. Load-naive athletes, who are often skeletally immature, will likely benefit from serial monitoring and should train and compete with caution, while load-tolerant athletes may only need occasional monitoring and progress to optimum loads.
STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION TAXONOMY (SORT): B.
大多数关于竞技发展训练模式的现有数据都集中在成年或职业运动员身上,在这些运动员中,增加工作量和提高表现是主要目标。青年运动员的发展途径通常强调多运动参与,而不是专项运动,以优化运动技能的获取,并最大限度地降低受伤风险。其他模式强调需要积累特定于运动和技能的时间来培养精英水平。尽管不建议专项化,但许多青年运动员仍然选择专项化,需要在训练和比赛方面的指导。医学和运动专业人士还建议逐渐增加工作量,以提高对高水平比赛要求的适应能力。对于在受伤和成熟期间专门训练青年运动员的风险分层和重返赛场,目前还没有公认的模式。在这篇综述中,我们为专门的青年运动员提出了个性化的训练模式,(1)优先考虑健康、有弹性的青年运动员的表现,(2)通过易受伤害的成熟时期和受伤进行适应性调整。
对现有文献进行非系统性评价和批判性评估。
临床综述。
4 级。
为年轻运动员制定训练计划时需要考虑许多因素:(1)专项化对运动员发展和受伤的影响,(2)生物成熟度,(3)专项化青年运动员的运动和协调缺陷,以及(4)工作量进展和对负荷的反应。
具有多种危险因素的负荷敏感型运动员可能需要医学评估、频繁监测以及旨在恢复局部组织和特定于运动能力的计划。负荷无经验的运动员,通常骨骼不成熟,可能会受益于连续监测,并且应该谨慎训练和比赛,而负荷耐受型运动员可能只需要偶尔监测,并逐渐达到最佳负荷。
推荐强度分类(SORT):B。