• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牧师患者导航员和多学科家庭会议对重症监护病房患者预后的影响:重症护理协作与沟通项目

The Effect of Chaplain Patient Navigators and Multidisciplinary Family Meetings on Patient Outcomes in the ICU: The Critical Care Collaboration and Communication Project.

作者信息

Alghanim Fahid, Furqan Muhammad, Prichett Laura, Landon Jondavid, Tao Xueting, Selvam Pooja, Leslie Myles, Hartman-Shea Katherine, Teague Paula, Scott Wayman, Kraeuter Susan, Hicks Heather, Jain Sneha, York Sarah, Blanding Renee, Zakaria Sammy

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.

出版信息

Crit Care Explor. 2021 Nov 8;3(11):e0574. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000574. eCollection 2021 Nov.

DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000000574
PMID:34765982
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8577665/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of a chaplain patient navigator in improving outcomes and reducing costs in the ICU setting.

DESIGN

A randomized controlled trial at a large, urban, academic community hospital in Baltimore, Maryland.

SETTING/PATIENTS: All patients admitted to the Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center Cardiac and Medical ICUs between March 2015 and December 2015.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients in the intervention group were assigned a chaplain patient navigator to facilitate communication, offer support, and setup multidisciplinary family meetings.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcomes were hospital and ICU length of stay. Secondary outcomes included total and ICU charges, 60- and 90-day readmission rates, and the number of palliative care consults. For all outcomes, patients were included in the intention-to-treat analyses only if they remained in the ICU greater than 24 hours. In total, 1,174 were randomly assigned to "usual care" ( = 573) or to the intervention ( = 601). In the intervention group, 44.8% (269/601) had meetings within 24 hours of admission and, of those patients, 32.8% (88/268) took part in the larger multidisciplinary family meeting 2-3 days later. The intervention group had longer mean adjusted hospital length of stay (7.78 vs 8.63 d; ≤ 0.001) and mean ICU length of stay (3.65 vs 3.87 d; = 0.029). In addition, they had greater total and ICU charges. There were no differences in other outcomes. Of note, only differences in total and ICU charges remained when controlling for case-mix index, which were greater in the intervention group.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the chaplain patient navigator anecdotally enhanced communication, our study found an increase in hospital and ICU length of stay as well as cost. Since other studies have shown benefits in some clinical outcomes, projects focused on patient navigators may learn lessons from our study in order to better prioritize family meetings, gather indicators of communication quality, and identify the optimal patient navigator operational context.

摘要

目的

评估神职人员患者导航员在改善重症监护病房(ICU)环境下的治疗效果及降低成本方面的有效性。

设计

在马里兰州巴尔的摩市一家大型城市学术社区医院进行的随机对照试验。

地点/患者:2015年3月至2015年12月期间入住约翰霍普金斯湾景医疗中心心脏科和内科重症监护病房的所有患者。

干预措施

为干预组患者分配一名神职人员患者导航员,以促进沟通、提供支持并组织多学科家庭会议。

测量指标及主要结果

主要结局指标为住院时间和ICU住院时间。次要结局指标包括总费用和ICU费用、60天和90天再入院率以及姑息治疗会诊次数。对于所有结局指标,仅当患者在ICU停留超过24小时时才纳入意向性分析。总共1174例患者被随机分配至“常规护理”组(n = 573)或干预组(n = 601)。在干预组中,44.8%(269/601)的患者在入院后24小时内召开了会议,其中32.8%(88/268)的患者在2 - 3天后参加了规模更大的多学科家庭会议。干预组调整后的平均住院时间更长(7.78天对8.63天;P≤0.001),平均ICU住院时间也更长(3.65天对3.87天;P = 0.029)。此外,干预组的总费用和ICU费用更高。其他结局指标无差异。值得注意的是,在控制病例组合指数后,仅总费用和ICU费用存在差异,且干预组的差异更大。

结论

尽管神职人员患者导航员在改善沟通方面有一定作用,但我们的研究发现住院时间和ICU住院时间以及成本均有所增加。鉴于其他研究在某些临床结局方面显示出益处,专注于患者导航员的项目可能会从我们的研究中吸取经验教训,以便更好地安排家庭会议的优先级、收集沟通质量指标并确定最佳的患者导航员操作环境。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d33f/8577665/c3552b8ca985/cc9-3-e0574-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d33f/8577665/74a134da1546/cc9-3-e0574-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d33f/8577665/c3552b8ca985/cc9-3-e0574-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d33f/8577665/74a134da1546/cc9-3-e0574-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d33f/8577665/c3552b8ca985/cc9-3-e0574-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The Effect of Chaplain Patient Navigators and Multidisciplinary Family Meetings on Patient Outcomes in the ICU: The Critical Care Collaboration and Communication Project.牧师患者导航员和多学科家庭会议对重症监护病房患者预后的影响:重症护理协作与沟通项目
Crit Care Explor. 2021 Nov 8;3(11):e0574. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000574. eCollection 2021 Nov.
2
"The Patient Is Dying, Please Call the Chaplain": The Activities of Chaplains in One Medical Center's Intensive Care Units.“患者生命垂危,请呼叫牧师”:某医疗中心重症监护病房牧师的工作
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Oct;50(4):501-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.05.003. Epub 2015 May 27.
3
The Role of the Chaplain as a Patient Navigator and Advocate for Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: One Academic Medical Center's Experience.牧师作为重症监护病房患者导航员和患者代言人的角色:一家学术医疗中心的经验。
J Relig Health. 2019 Oct;58(5):1833-1846. doi: 10.1007/s10943-019-00865-z.
4
Effect of Palliative Care-Led Meetings for Families of Patients With Chronic Critical Illness: A Randomized Clinical Trial.以姑息治疗为主导的慢性危重病患者家属会议的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2016 Jul 5;316(1):51-62. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.8474.
5
The impact of a multidisciplinary approach on caring for ventilator-dependent patients.多学科方法对呼吸机依赖患者护理的影响。
Int J Qual Health Care. 1998 Feb;10(1):15-26. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/10.1.15.
6
Effectiveness trial of an intensive communication structure for families of long-stay ICU patients.长期住 ICU 患者家庭强化沟通结构的有效性试验。
Chest. 2010 Dec;138(6):1340-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-0292. Epub 2010 Jun 24.
7
Early Palliative Care Consultation in the Medical ICU: A Cluster Randomized Crossover Trial.早期在重症监护病房进行姑息治疗咨询:一项集群随机交叉试验。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Dec;47(12):1707-1715. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004016.
8
Non-pharmacological interventions for sleep promotion in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房促进睡眠的非药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 6;2015(10):CD008808. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008808.pub2.
9
The effectiveness of interventions to meet family needs of critically ill patients in an adult intensive care unit: a systematic review update.成人重症监护病房中满足重症患者家庭需求的干预措施的有效性:系统评价更新
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Mar;14(3):181-234. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2477.
10
Palliative Care Planner: A Pilot Study to Evaluate Acceptability and Usability of an Electronic Health Records System-integrated, Needs-targeted App Platform.姑息治疗计划者:一项评估电子病历系统集成、需求导向的应用平台可接受性和可用性的试点研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018 Jan;15(1):59-68. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201706-500OC.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving Outcomes for ICU Family Members: The Role of Spiritual Care.改善重症监护室家庭成员的结局:精神关怀的作用。
J Palliat Med. 2025 Apr;28(4):538-548. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2024.0165. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
2
Evolution and Effects of Ad Hoc Multidisciplinary Team Meetings in the Emergency Intensive Care Unit: A Five-Year Analysis.急诊重症监护病房临时多学科团队会议的演变与影响:一项为期五年的分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 24;13(15):4324. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154324.
3
Disclosing Results of Tests for Covert Consciousness: A Framework for Ethical Translation.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of Time-Limited Trials Among Critically Ill Patients With Advanced Medical Illnesses and Reduction of Nonbeneficial ICU Treatments.评估患有晚期内科疾病的危重症患者的限时试验和减少无益的 ICU 治疗。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Jun 1;181(6):786-794. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.1000.
2
Trends in Noninvasive and Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Among Medicare Beneficiaries at the End of Life.终末期 Medicare 受益人群的无创和有创机械通气趋势。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Jan 1;181(1):93-102. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5640.
3
Training Healthcare Chaplains: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow.
揭示隐匿意识测试结果:伦理翻译框架。
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Jun;40(3):865-878. doi: 10.1007/s12028-023-01899-8. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
4
The role of specialty palliative care interdisciplinary team members in acute care decision support: a qualitative study protocol.专科姑息治疗跨学科团队成员在急性照护决策支持中的作用:一项定性研究方案。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Jan 3;23(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01328-9.
5
Effects of Spiritual Care on Well-Being of Intensive Care Family Surrogates: A Clinical Trial.精神关怀对重症监护家庭代理人幸福感的影响:一项临床试验。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Apr;65(4):296-307. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.12.007. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
培训医疗保健牧师:昨天、今天和明天。
J Pastoral Care Counsel. 2019 Dec;73(4):211-221. doi: 10.1177/1542305019875819.
4
Association of Surrogate Decision-making Interventions for Critically Ill Adults With Patient, Family, and Resource Use Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.危重症成人代理决策干预与患者、家庭和资源使用结局的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e197229. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.7229.
5
The Role of the Chaplain as a Patient Navigator and Advocate for Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: One Academic Medical Center's Experience.牧师作为重症监护病房患者导航员和患者代言人的角色:一家学术医疗中心的经验。
J Relig Health. 2019 Oct;58(5):1833-1846. doi: 10.1007/s10943-019-00865-z.
6
Clinician-Family Communication About Patients' Values and Preferences in Intensive Care Units.临床医生与患者家属在重症监护病房中就患者价值观和偏好的沟通。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 May 1;179(5):676-684. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0027.
7
The cost of not addressing the communication barriers faced by hospitalized patients.不解决住院患者所面临的沟通障碍的代价。
Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups. 2018 Jan;3(12):99-112. doi: 10.1044/persp3.SIG12.99.
8
Intuitive vs Deliberative Approaches to Making Decisions About Life Support: A Randomized Clinical Trial.关于生命支持决策的直观与深思熟虑方法:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):e187851. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7851.
9
Identifying the Best Approach to Patient-Centered Decisions About Serious Illness Care: What's Autonomy Got to Do With It?确定以患者为中心的重症护理决策的最佳方法:这与自主权有何关系?
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):e187872. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7872.
10
A pilot study assessing the spiritual, emotional, physical/environmental, and physiological needs of mechanically ventilated surgical intensive care unit patients via eye tracking devices, head nodding, and communication boards.一项通过眼动追踪设备、点头和交流板评估外科重症监护病房机械通气患者的精神、情感、身体/环境和生理需求的试点研究。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2018 Sep 19;3(1):e000180. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2018-000180. eCollection 2018.