Center for Innovation in Medical Education, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 19;16(11):e0260193. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260193. eCollection 2021.
Extracurricular research programmes (ERPs) may contribute to reducing the current shortage in physician-scientists, but usually select students based on grades only. The question arises if students should be selected based on their motivation, regardless of their previous academic performance. Focusing on grades and lacking to take motivation into account when selecting students for ERPs might exclude an important target group when aiming to cultivate future physician-scientists. Therefore, this study compared ERP students with lower and higher previous academic performance on subsequent academic performance, ERP performance, and motivational factors.
Prospective cohort study with undergraduate medical students who filled in a yearly questionnaire on motivational factors. Two student groups participating in an ERP were compared: students with first-year grade point average (GPA) ≥7 versus <7 on a 10-point grading scale. Linear and logistic regressions analyses were used to compare groups on subsequent academic performance (i.e. third-year GPA, in-time bachelor completion), ERP performance (i.e. drop-out, number of credits), and motivational factors (i.e. intrinsic motivation for research, research self-efficacy beliefs, perceptions of research, curiosity), while adjusting for gender and motivational factors at baseline.
The <7 group had significantly lower third-year GPA, and significantly higher odds for ERP drop-out than the ≥7 group. However, there was no significant between-group difference on in-time bachelor completion and the <7 group was not inferior to the ≥7 group in terms of intrinsic motivation for research, perceptions of research, and curiosity.
Since intrinsic motivation for research, perceptions of research, and curiosity are prerequisites of future research involvement, it seems beneficial to focus on motivation when selecting students for ERPS, allowing students with lower current academic performance to participate in ERPs as well.
课外研究计划(ERPs)可能有助于减少目前医师科学家的短缺,但通常仅根据成绩选择学生。问题是,是否应该根据学生的动机选择学生,而不考虑他们以前的学业成绩。如果在选择参加 ERP 的学生时只关注成绩而忽略动机,可能会在培养未来医师科学家时排除一个重要的目标群体。因此,本研究比较了成绩较低和较高的 ERP 学生在后续学业成绩、ERP 表现和动机因素方面的差异。
这是一项前瞻性队列研究,涉及参加 ERP 的本科生,他们每年填写一次关于动机因素的问卷。比较了参加 ERP 的两组学生:第一学年绩点(GPA)≥7 与<7 的学生(10 分制)。使用线性和逻辑回归分析比较两组学生的后续学业成绩(即第三学年 GPA、按时完成学士学业)、ERP 表现(即辍学、学分数)和动机因素(即研究内在动机、研究自我效能感、对研究的看法、好奇心),同时调整性别和基线时的动机因素。
<7 组的第三学年 GPA 明显较低,辍学的可能性明显高于≥7 组。然而,在按时完成学士学业方面,两组之间没有显著差异,并且<7 组在研究内在动机、对研究的看法和好奇心方面并不逊于≥7 组。
由于研究内在动机、对研究的看法和好奇心是未来研究参与的前提,因此在选择学生参加 ERP 时关注动机似乎是有益的,这允许成绩较低的学生也有机会参加 ERP。