• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序既是一种新兴技术,也是一种公共卫生干预措施:有必要考虑承诺话语。

The UK COVID-19 contact tracing app as both an emerging technology and public health intervention: The need to consider promissory discourses.

机构信息

King's College London, UK.

Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Switzerland.

出版信息

Health (London). 2023 Jul;27(4):625-644. doi: 10.1177/13634593211060768. Epub 2021 Nov 23.

DOI:10.1177/13634593211060768
PMID:34812092
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10196686/
Abstract

The UK's National Health Service (NHS) COVID-19 contact tracing app was announced to the British public on 12th April 2020. The UK government endorsed the app as a public health intervention that would improve public health, protect the NHS and 'save lives'. On 5th May 2020 the technology was released for trial on the Isle of Wight. However, the trial was halted in June 2020, reportedly due to technological issues. The app was later remodelled and launched to the public in September 2020. The rapid development, trial and discontinuation of the app over a short period of a few months meant that the mobilisation and effect of the discourses associated with the app could be traced relatively easily. In this paper we aimed to explore how these discourses were constructed in the media, and their effect on actors - in particular, those who developed and those who trialled the app. Promissory discourses were prevalent, the trajectory of which aligned with theories developed in the sociology of expectations. We describe this trajectory, and then interpret its implications in terms of infectious disease public health practices and responsibilities.

摘要

英国国民保健制度(NHS)的 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序于 2020 年 4 月 12 日向英国公众宣布。英国政府认可该应用程序是一项公共卫生干预措施,将改善公共卫生、保护国民保健制度并“拯救生命”。2020 年 5 月 5 日,该技术在怀特岛进行了试用。然而,据报道,由于技术问题,该试验于 2020 年 6 月停止。该应用程序后来经过重新设计,并于 2020 年 9 月向公众推出。该应用程序在短短几个月的时间内经历了快速开发、试验和停用,这意味着与该应用程序相关的论述的动员和影响可以相对容易地追踪。在本文中,我们旨在探讨这些论述是如何在媒体中构建的,以及它们对参与者的影响——特别是那些开发和试用该应用程序的人。有希望的论述是普遍存在的,其轨迹与期望社会学中发展的理论相一致。我们描述了这一轨迹,然后从传染病公共卫生实践和责任的角度来解释其含义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9dc/10197154/69bbac935774/10.1177_13634593211060768-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9dc/10197154/dc4a8010e27f/10.1177_13634593211060768-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9dc/10197154/2273f671ee85/10.1177_13634593211060768-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9dc/10197154/69bbac935774/10.1177_13634593211060768-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9dc/10197154/dc4a8010e27f/10.1177_13634593211060768-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9dc/10197154/2273f671ee85/10.1177_13634593211060768-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9dc/10197154/69bbac935774/10.1177_13634593211060768-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
The UK COVID-19 contact tracing app as both an emerging technology and public health intervention: The need to consider promissory discourses.英国 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序既是一种新兴技术,也是一种公共卫生干预措施:有必要考虑承诺话语。
Health (London). 2023 Jul;27(4):625-644. doi: 10.1177/13634593211060768. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
2
Ecologies of Public Trust: The NHS COVID-19 Contact Tracing App.公众信任的生态系统:NHS COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序。
J Bioeth Inq. 2021 Dec;18(4):595-608. doi: 10.1007/s11673-021-10127-x. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
3
Understanding Trust and Changes in Use After a Year With the NHS COVID-19 Contact Tracing App in the United Kingdom: Longitudinal Mixed Methods Study.理解信任和在英国使用 NHS COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序一年后的变化:纵向混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 14;24(10):e40558. doi: 10.2196/40558.
4
Public Adoption of and Trust in the NHS COVID-19 Contact Tracing App in the United Kingdom: Quantitative Online Survey Study.英国国民保健制度 (NHS) COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的公众采用和信任:定量在线调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 17;23(9):e29085. doi: 10.2196/29085.
5
Public attitudes towards COVID-19 contact tracing apps: A UK-based focus group study.公众对 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的态度:基于英国的焦点小组研究。
Health Expect. 2021 Apr;24(2):377-385. doi: 10.1111/hex.13179. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
6
Epidemiological changes on the Isle of Wight after the launch of the NHS Test and Trace programme: a preliminary analysis.NHS Test and Trace 项目推出后,怀特岛的流行病学变化:初步分析。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Dec;2(12):e658-e666. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30241-7. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
7
Acceptability of App-Based Contact Tracing for COVID-19: Cross-Country Survey Study.基于应用程序的 COVID-19 接触者追踪的可接受性:跨国调查研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Aug 28;8(8):e19857. doi: 10.2196/19857.
8
Technology, Privacy, and User Opinions of COVID-19 Mobile Apps for Contact Tracing: Systematic Search and Content Analysis.技术、隐私和用户对 COVID-19 移动接触追踪应用程序的看法:系统搜索和内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 9;23(2):e23467. doi: 10.2196/23467.
9
The relationship between trust and attitudes towards the COVID-19 digital contact-tracing app in the UK.英国民众对 COVID-19 数字接触追踪应用程序的信任与态度之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 27;17(10):e0276661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276661. eCollection 2022.
10
Effectiveness evaluation of digital contact tracing for COVID-19 in New South Wales, Australia.澳大利亚新南威尔士州数字接触者追踪在 COVID-19 中的效果评估。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 Mar;7(3):e250-e258. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00010-X. Epub 2022 Feb 4.

引用本文的文献

1
The promise of artificial intelligence in health: Portrayals of emerging healthcare technologies.人工智能在医疗领域的前景:新兴医疗技术的描绘
Sociol Health Illn. 2025 Jan;47(1):e13840. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13840. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
2
Identifying Barriers to the Adoption of Digital Contact Tracing Apps in England: Semistructured Interview Study With Professionals Involved in the Pandemic Response.识别英国采用数字接触者追踪应用程序的障碍:对参与疫情应对的专业人员进行的半结构化访谈研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Aug 12;8:e56000. doi: 10.2196/56000.
3
Ethical preparedness in health research and care: the role of behavioural approaches.

本文引用的文献

1
Ecologies of Public Trust: The NHS COVID-19 Contact Tracing App.公众信任的生态系统:NHS COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序。
J Bioeth Inq. 2021 Dec;18(4):595-608. doi: 10.1007/s11673-021-10127-x. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
2
Reporting consciousness in coma: media framing of neuro-scientific research, hope, and the response of families with relatives in vegetative and minimally conscious states.昏迷状态下的意识报告:神经科学研究的媒体框架、希望以及亲属处于植物人和微意识状态的家庭的反应。
JOMEC J. 2013 Jun 1;3:10244. doi: 10.18573/j.2013.10244. eCollection 2013.
3
Population health AI researchers' perceptions of the public portrayal of AI: A pilot study.
卫生研究和保健中的伦理准备:行为方法的作用。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Nov 17;23(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00853-1.
4
The Impact of Digital Contact Tracing Apps Overuse on Prevention of COVID-19: A Normative Activation Model Perspective.数字接触追踪应用过度使用对COVID-19预防的影响:规范激活模型视角
Life (Basel). 2022 Sep 2;12(9):1371. doi: 10.3390/life12091371.
5
How is "solidarity" understood in discussions about contact tracing apps? An overview.关于接触者追踪应用程序的讨论中如何理解“团结”?概述。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 22;10:859831. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.859831. eCollection 2022.
6
Framing ethical issues associated with the UK COVID-19 contact tracing app: exceptionalising and narrowing the public ethics debate.构建与英国新冠病毒接触者追踪应用程序相关的伦理问题:使公共伦理辩论特殊化并使其范围变窄
Ethics Inf Technol. 2022;24(1):5. doi: 10.1007/s10676-022-09628-z. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
人口健康人工智能研究人员对人工智能公众形象的看法:一项试点研究。
Public Underst Sci. 2021 Feb;30(2):196-211. doi: 10.1177/0963662520965490. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
4
Epidemiological changes on the Isle of Wight after the launch of the NHS Test and Trace programme: a preliminary analysis.NHS Test and Trace 项目推出后,怀特岛的流行病学变化:初步分析。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Dec;2(12):e658-e666. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30241-7. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
5
COVID-19 and Contact Tracing Apps: Ethical Challenges for a Social Experiment on a Global Scale.COVID-19 和接触者追踪应用程序:全球范围内社会实验的伦理挑战。
J Bioeth Inq. 2020 Dec;17(4):835-839. doi: 10.1007/s11673-020-10016-9. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
6
Blind-sided by privacy? Digital contact tracing, the Apple/Google API and big tech's newfound role as global health policy makers.被隐私问题打个措手不及?数字接触者追踪、苹果/谷歌应用程序编程接口以及科技巨头作为全球卫生政策制定者的新角色。
Ethics Inf Technol. 2021;23(Suppl 1):45-57. doi: 10.1007/s10676-020-09547-x. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
7
Ethics of instantaneous contact tracing using mobile phone apps in the control of the COVID-19 pandemic.利用手机应用程序进行即时接触者追踪以控制 COVID-19 大流行的伦理问题。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Jul;46(7):427-431. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106314. Epub 2020 May 4.
8
Quantifying SARS-CoV-2 transmission suggests epidemic control with digital contact tracing.量化 SARS-CoV-2 传播表明数字接触者追踪可控制疫情。
Science. 2020 May 8;368(6491). doi: 10.1126/science.abb6936. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
9
Influenza vaccination discourse in major Canadian news media, 2017-2018.2017 - 2018年加拿大主要新闻媒体中的流感疫苗接种相关论述
Heliyon. 2018 Nov 27;4(11):e00970. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00970. eCollection 2018 Nov.
10
The UK's 100,000 Genomes Project: manifesting policymakers' expectations.英国的“十万基因组计划”:兑现政策制定者的期望。
New Genet Soc. 2017 Sep 6;36(4):336-353. doi: 10.1080/14636778.2017.1370671. eCollection 2017.