• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

森林工作者疟疾预防措施的可接受性和可行性:柬埔寨定性研究的结果。

Acceptability and feasibility of malaria prophylaxis for forest goers: findings from a qualitative study in Cambodia.

机构信息

Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Malar J. 2021 Nov 25;20(1):446. doi: 10.1186/s12936-021-03983-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12936-021-03983-w
PMID:34823527
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8613728/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the Greater Mekong Subregion, adults are at highest risk for malaria, particularly those who visit forests. The absence of effective vector control strategies and limited periods of exposure during forest visits suggest that chemoprophylaxis could be an appropriate strategy to protect forest goers against malaria.

METHODS

Alongside a clinical trial of anti-malarial chemoprophylaxis in northern Cambodia, qualitative research was conducted, including in-depth interviews and observation, to explore the acceptability of malaria prophylaxis for forest goers, the implementation opportunities, and challenges of this strategy.

RESULTS

Prophylaxis with artemether-lumefantrine for forest goers was found to be acceptable under trial conditions. Three factors played a major role: the community's awareness and perception of the effectiveness of prophylaxis, their trust in the provider, and malaria as a local health concern. The findings highlight how uptake and adherence to prophylaxis are influenced by the perceived balance between benefits and burden of anti-malarials which are modulated by the seasonality of forest visits and its influence on malaria risk.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of anti-malarial prophylaxis needs to consider how the preventive medication can be incorporated into existing vector-control measures, malaria testing and treatment services. The next step in the roll out of anti-malarial prophylaxis for forest visitors will require support from local health workers.

摘要

背景

在大湄公河次区域,成年人感染疟疾的风险最高,特别是那些经常出入森林的人。由于缺乏有效的病媒控制策略,且出入森林的时间有限,因此化学预防可能是保护森林工作者免受疟疾侵害的一种适当策略。

方法

在柬埔寨北部进行抗疟化学预防临床试验的同时,开展了定性研究,包括深入访谈和观察,以探讨森林工作者对疟疾预防的接受程度、该策略的实施机会和挑战。

结果

在试验条件下,发现为森林工作者提供青蒿琥酯-苯芴醇预防疟疾是可接受的。有三个因素起了主要作用:社区对预防措施有效性的认识和看法、对提供者的信任,以及疟疾作为当地的健康关注点。调查结果强调了接受和坚持预防的程度受到抗疟药物益处和负担之间的平衡的影响,这种平衡受森林访问的季节性及其对疟疾风险的影响而发生变化。

结论

实施抗疟预防措施需要考虑如何将预防性药物纳入现有的病媒控制措施、疟疾检测和治疗服务中。下一步将需要当地卫生工作者的支持,以推广针对森林访客的抗疟预防措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7ed/8613995/9b77d9a44c76/12936_2021_3983_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7ed/8613995/0ebef123710d/12936_2021_3983_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7ed/8613995/9b77d9a44c76/12936_2021_3983_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7ed/8613995/0ebef123710d/12936_2021_3983_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7ed/8613995/9b77d9a44c76/12936_2021_3983_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Acceptability and feasibility of malaria prophylaxis for forest goers: findings from a qualitative study in Cambodia.森林工作者疟疾预防措施的可接受性和可行性:柬埔寨定性研究的结果。
Malar J. 2021 Nov 25;20(1):446. doi: 10.1186/s12936-021-03983-w.
2
Forest malaria and prospects for anti-malarial chemoprophylaxis among forest goers: findings from a qualitative study in Lao PDR.森林疟疾与森林旅行者抗疟化学预防的前景:来自老挝人民民主共和国一项定性研究的发现。
Malar J. 2022 Jan 5;21(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12936-021-04027-z.
3
Forest malaria and prospects for anti-malarial chemoprophylaxis among forest goers: findings from a qualitative study in Thailand.森林疟疾与森林旅行者抗疟化学预防的前景:来自泰国的定性研究结果。
Malar J. 2022 Feb 14;21(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12936-022-04070-4.
4
Study protocol: an open-label individually randomised controlled trial to assess the efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine prophylaxis for malaria among forest goers in Cambodia.研究方案:一项开放标签、个体随机对照试验,旨在评估青蒿琥酯-咯萘啶预防柬埔寨森林工作者疟疾的疗效。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 7;11(7):e045900. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045900.
5
Community engagement among forest goers in a malaria prophylaxis trial: implementation challenges and implications.森林游客参与疟疾预防试验:实施挑战及启示。
Malar J. 2023 Jun 8;22(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12936-023-04610-6.
6
Antimalarial chemoprophylaxis for forest goers in southeast Asia: an open-label, individually randomised controlled trial.东南亚森林工作者的抗疟化学预防:一项开放标签、个体随机对照试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 Jan;23(1):81-90. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00492-3. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
7
How can interventions that target forest-goers be tailored to accelerate malaria elimination in the Greater Mekong Subregion? A systematic review of the qualitative literature.如何针对森林游客实施干预措施,以加速大湄公河次区域消除疟疾?定性文献的系统评价。
Malar J. 2019 Feb 1;18(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12936-019-2666-5.
8
Modelling the optimal dosing schedule for artemether-lumefantrine chemoprophylaxis against malaria.建模青蒿琥酯-咯萘啶化学预防疟疾的最佳剂量方案。
BMC Res Notes. 2022 Oct 2;15(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-06212-y.
9
Choosing interventions to eliminate forest malaria: preliminary results of two operational research studies inside Cambodian forests.选择干预措施消除森林疟疾:柬埔寨森林内两项实施性研究的初步结果。
Malar J. 2021 Jan 20;20(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-03572-3.
10
The use of respondent‑driven sampling to assess febrile illness treatment-seeking behaviours among forest-goers in Cambodia and Vietnam.应用应答驱动抽样法评估柬埔寨和越南森林工作者发热求医行为。
Malar J. 2021 Dec 20;20(1):477. doi: 10.1186/s12936-021-04001-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating malaria reactive surveillance and response strategies in northeast Cambodia: a mixed-methods study.柬埔寨东北部疟疾反应性监测与应对策略评估:一项混合方法研究。
Malar J. 2025 Jul 13;24(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12936-025-05475-7.
2
Forest-Going as a Risk Factor for Confirmed Malaria in Champasak Province, Lao PDR: A Case-Control Study.老挝人民民主共和国占巴塞省森林活动作为确诊疟疾风险因素的病例对照研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Dec 4;21(12):1624. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121624.
3
Malaria elimination challenges in countries approaching the last mile: a discussion among regional stakeholders.

本文引用的文献

1
Study protocol: an open-label individually randomised controlled trial to assess the efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine prophylaxis for malaria among forest goers in Cambodia.研究方案:一项开放标签、个体随机对照试验,旨在评估青蒿琥酯-咯萘啶预防柬埔寨森林工作者疟疾的疗效。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 7;11(7):e045900. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045900.
2
End-user perspectives on preventive antimalarials: A review of qualitative research.终端用户对预防性抗疟药物的看法:定性研究综述
Glob Public Health. 2022 May;17(5):753-767. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2021.1888388. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
3
Choosing interventions to eliminate forest malaria: preliminary results of two operational research studies inside Cambodian forests.
接近疟疾消除最后阶段国家面临的挑战:地区利益相关者之间的讨论
Malar J. 2024 Dec 26;23(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s12936-024-05215-3.
4
Recent Advancement in Drug Development for Treating Malaria using Herbal Medicine and Nanotechnological Approach.利用草药和纳米技术方法治疗疟疾的药物研发最新进展
Curr Pharm Des. 2025;31(3):203-218. doi: 10.2174/0113816128321468240828103439.
5
Factors associated with never treatment and acceptability of mass drug administration for the elimination of lymphatic filariasis in Guyana, 2021.2021年圭亚那与从未接受治疗以及群体服药消除淋巴丝虫病可接受性相关的因素
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Apr 25;4(4):e0001985. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001985. eCollection 2024.
6
Forest-goers as a heterogeneous population at high-risk for malaria: a case-control study in Aceh Province, Indonesia.森林游客是疟疾高危异质人群:印度尼西亚亚齐省的病例对照研究。
Malar J. 2024 Jan 30;23(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12936-024-04856-8.
7
Knowledge, compliance, and challenges in anti-malarial products usage: a systematic review of at-risk communities for zoonotic malaria.抗疟产品使用的知识、合规性和挑战:对动物源性疟疾高危社区的系统回顾。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 29;24(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17792-8.
8
Assessing the acceptability and feasibility of reactive drug administration for malaria elimination in a Plasmodium vivax predominant setting: a qualitative study in two provinces in Thailand.评估在以间日疟原虫为主的流行地区消除疟疾时采用反应性药物给药的可接受性和可行性:泰国两个省的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jul 13;23(1):1346. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15852-z.
9
Community engagement among forest goers in a malaria prophylaxis trial: implementation challenges and implications.森林游客参与疟疾预防试验:实施挑战及启示。
Malar J. 2023 Jun 8;22(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12936-023-04610-6.
10
Understanding work-related travel and its relation to malaria occurrence in Thailand using geospatial maximum entropy modelling.利用地理空间最大熵模型理解泰国与工作相关的旅行及其与疟疾发生的关系。
Malar J. 2023 Feb 13;22(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12936-023-04478-6.
选择干预措施消除森林疟疾:柬埔寨森林内两项实施性研究的初步结果。
Malar J. 2021 Jan 20;20(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-03572-3.
4
Engaging ethnic minority communities through performance and arts: health education in Cambodian forest villages.通过表演和艺术吸引少数民族社区:柬埔寨森林村庄的健康教育。
Int Health. 2021 Feb 24;13(2):188-195. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihaa076.
5
Opinions of key stakeholders on alternative interventions for malaria control and elimination in Tanzania.坦桑尼亚疟疾控制和消除替代干预措施的主要利益攸关方意见。
Malar J. 2020 Apr 23;19(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-03239-z.
6
A systematic review of factors affecting adherence to malaria chemoprophylaxis amongst travellers from non-endemic countries.非疟疾流行国家旅行者服用疟疾化学预防药物的依从性影响因素的系统评价
Malar J. 2020 Jan 13;19(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-3104-4.
7
Intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in infants.婴儿疟疾的间歇性预防治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 2;12(12):CD011525. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011525.pub2.
8
Forest work and its implications for malaria elimination: a qualitative study.森林工作及其对疟疾消除的影响:一项定性研究。
Malar J. 2019 Nov 27;18(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s12936-019-3008-3.
9
Adherence to malaria prophylaxis among travelers from a middle-income country.来自中等收入国家旅行者对疟疾预防措施的依从性。
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2019 Jun 6;52:e20190014. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0014-2019.
10
Novel Approaches to Control Malaria in Forested Areas of Southeast Asia.东南亚森林地区疟疾控制的新方法。
Trends Parasitol. 2019 Jun;35(6):388-398. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2019.03.011. Epub 2019 May 7.