Suppr超能文献

极化小胶质细胞的细胞因子诱导差异反应。

Differential Cytokine-Induced Responses of Polarized Microglia.

作者信息

Chauhan Priyanka, Sheng Wen S, Hu Shuxian, Prasad Sujata, Lokensgard James R

机构信息

Neurovirology Laboratory, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

3-107 Microbiology Research Facility, University of Minnesota, 689 23rd Avenue S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2021 Nov 10;11(11):1482. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11111482.

Abstract

The role of select pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators in driving microglial cell polarization into classically (M1), or alternatively, (M2) activated states, as well as the subsequent differential responses of these induced phenotypes, was examined. Expression of PD-L1, MHC-II, MHC-I, arginase 1 (Arg-1), and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) was assessed using multi-color flow cytometry. We observed that both pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators induced PD-L1 expression on non-polarized microglia. Moreover, IFN-γ stimulated significant MHC class I and II expression on these cells. Interestingly, we observed that only IL-4 treatment induced Arg-1 expression, indicating M2 polarization. These M2 cells were refractory to subsequent depolarization and maintained their alternatively activated state. Furthermore, PD-L1 expression was significantly induced on these M2-polarized microglia after treatment with pro-inflammatory mediators, but not anti-inflammatory cytokines. In addition, we observed that only LPS induced iNOS expression in microglial cells, indicating M1 polarization. Furthermore, IFN-γ significantly increased the percentage of M1-polarized microglia expressing iNOS. Surprisingly, when these M1-polarized microglia were treated with either IL-6 or other anti-inflammatory cytokines, they returned to their non-polarized state, as demonstrated by significantly reduced expression of iNOS. Taken together, these results demonstrate differential responses of microglial cells to mediators present in dissimilar microenvironments.

摘要

研究了特定促炎和抗炎介质在驱动小胶质细胞极化为经典激活状态(M1)或替代激活状态(M2)以及这些诱导表型随后的差异反应中的作用。使用多色流式细胞术评估程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)、主要组织相容性复合体II类(MHC-II)、主要组织相容性复合体I类(MHC-I)、精氨酸酶1(Arg-1)和诱导型一氧化氮合酶(iNOS)的表达。我们观察到,促炎和抗炎介质均可诱导非极化小胶质细胞上PD-L1的表达。此外,γ干扰素刺激这些细胞上显著的MHC I类和II类表达。有趣的是,我们观察到只有白细胞介素4处理可诱导Arg-1表达,表明M2极化。这些M2细胞对随后的去极化具有抗性,并维持其替代激活状态。此外,在用促炎介质而非抗炎细胞因子处理后,这些M2极化的小胶质细胞上显著诱导了PD-L1表达。此外,我们观察到只有脂多糖可诱导小胶质细胞中iNOS表达,表明M1极化。此外,γ干扰素显著增加了表达iNOS的M1极化小胶质细胞的百分比。令人惊讶的是,当用白细胞介素6或其他抗炎细胞因子处理这些M1极化的小胶质细胞时,它们恢复到非极化状态,iNOS表达显著降低证明了这一点。综上所述,这些结果表明小胶质细胞对不同微环境中存在的介质有不同反应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec1b/8615503/0d2fe1e17c3b/brainsci-11-01482-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验