Melián-Fleitas Liliana, Franco-Pérez Álvaro, Caballero Pablo, Sanz-Lorente María, Wanden-Berghe Carmina, Sanz-Valero Javier
Nutrition Department, University of Granada, 18012 Granada, Spain.
Geriatric Service, Insular Hospital, Health Services Management of the Health Area of Lanzarote, 35500 Arrecife, Spain.
Nutrients. 2021 Nov 4;13(11):3945. doi: 10.3390/nu13113945.
To review the scientific literature on the influence of verified nutrition, food and diet interventions on occupational health.
This study involved a critical analysis of articles retrieved from MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS) and Medicina en Español (MEDES) using the descriptors "Diet, Food, and Nutrition" and "Occupational Health" and applying the filters "Clinical Trial", "Humans" and "Adult: 19+ years"; the search was conducted on 29 May 2021.
A total of 401 references were retrieved from the bibliographic databases, with an additional 16 identified through a secondary search; among the studies retrieved, 34 clinical trials were selected after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The interventions were grouped into seven categories: (1) dietary interventions associated with exercise or educational programs; (2) individual environmental interventions or other educational actions; (3) educational interventions oriented toward lifestyle, dietetics, physical activity and stress management; (4) economic incentives; (5) multicomponent interventions (combination of mindfulness, e-coaching and the addition of fruits and vegetables); or dietary interventions (facilitating greater food supply in cafeterias); or interventions focused on physical exercise.
Given that most people spend a large part of their time in the workplace and, therefore, eat at least one of their daily meals there, well-planned interventions-preferably including several strategies-have been demonstrated, in general, as useful for combating overweight and obesity. From the meta-regression study, it was observed that the interventions give better results in people who presented high Body Mass Index (BMI) values (obesity). In contrast, intervention 2 (interventions related to workplace environment) would not give the expected results (it would increase the BMI).
回顾关于经证实的营养、食物和饮食干预对职业健康影响的科学文献。
本研究对从MEDLINE(通过PubMed)、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、PsycINFO、Scopus、科学网、拉丁美洲和加勒比健康科学文献数据库(LILACS)以及西班牙医学数据库(MEDES)检索到的文章进行批判性分析,使用描述词“饮食、食物和营养”以及“职业健康”,并应用“临床试验”“人类”和“成年人:19岁及以上”的筛选条件;检索于2021年5月29日进行。
从文献数据库中总共检索到401篇参考文献,通过二次检索又识别出16篇;在所检索的研究中,应用纳入和排除标准后选择了34项临床试验。干预措施分为七类:(1)与运动或教育项目相关的饮食干预;(2)个体环境干预或其他教育行动;(3)针对生活方式、饮食学、体育活动和压力管理的教育干预;(4)经济激励措施;(5)多成分干预(正念、电子辅导与增加水果和蔬菜相结合);或饮食干预(在自助餐厅提供更多食物);或专注于体育锻炼的干预措施。
鉴于大多数人在工作场所度过大量时间,因此至少在那里吃一顿正餐,总体而言,精心规划的干预措施——最好包括多种策略——已被证明对对抗超重和肥胖有用。从元回归研究中观察到,干预措施在体重指数(BMI)值较高(肥胖)的人群中效果更好。相比之下,干预措施2(与工作场所环境相关的干预措施)不会产生预期效果(会增加BMI)。