• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国南方地区实验室饲养的埃及伊蚊和白纹伊蚊中肠和全虫体的细菌组成。

Bacterial composition of midgut and entire body of laboratory colonies of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus from Southern China.

机构信息

Department of Parasitology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Key Laboratory of Tropical Disease Control, Ministry of Education, Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center for Diseases-Vectors Control, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Parasit Vectors. 2021 Nov 27;14(1):586. doi: 10.1186/s13071-021-05050-4.

DOI:10.1186/s13071-021-05050-4
PMID:34838108
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8626967/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus are invasive mosquito species and significantly impact human health in southern China. Microbiota are confirmed to affect the development and immunity of mosquitoes. However, scientists have focused more on midgut microbiota of female mosquitoes and bacterial differences between female and male Aedes mosquitoes. The relationship between the midgut and entire body microbiota of Aedes is unclear. In this study, we collected mosquito samples reared under the same laboratory conditions and compared the microbial composition of midgut and entire bodies of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus using 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

METHODS

In this study, we collected mosquito samples reared under the same laboratory conditions and compared the microbial composition of midgut and entire bodies of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus using 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

RESULTS

A total of 341 OTUs were identified, showing that Proteobacteria was the dominant phylum and Methylobacterium the dominant genus in both Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. The bacterial diversity and community structures of the entire bodies were similar between males and females in both Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. Conversely, the bacterial compositions of male and female Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus were significantly different. NMDS analysis, UPGMA analysis, diversity indices and OTU distribution demonstrated that compositions and structures in midgut microbiota were similar but significantly different in the entire bodies of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. Functional prediction analysis showed that metabolism and environmental information processing were the dominant KEGG pathways at level 1. Our study showed that there were significantly different level 2 and 3 KEGG pathways in the midgut microbiota (16 level 2 and 24 level 3) and the entire bodies (33 level 2 and 248 level 3) between female Aedes albopictus and Aedes Aegypti.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings that Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus reared in the same laboratory harbor a similar gut bacterial microbiome but different entire body microbiota imply that the gut microbiota of adult mosquitoes is environmentally determined regardless of the host genotype, but the entire body microbiota is more genetically determined. Our findings improved the understanding of the microbiota in the entire and partial tissues of Aedes mosquitoes.

摘要

背景

埃及伊蚊和白纹伊蚊是入侵性蚊种,对中国南方的人类健康有重大影响。微生物群已被证实会影响蚊子的发育和免疫力。然而,科学家们更关注雌性蚊子的中肠微生物群以及雌性和雄性埃及伊蚊和白纹伊蚊之间的细菌差异。关于埃及伊蚊和白纹伊蚊中肠和整个身体微生物群之间的关系尚不清楚。在这项研究中,我们收集了在相同实验室条件下饲养的蚊子样本,并使用 16S rRNA 基因测序比较了埃及伊蚊和白纹伊蚊中肠和整个身体的微生物组成。

方法

在这项研究中,我们收集了在相同实验室条件下饲养的蚊子样本,并使用 16S rRNA 基因测序比较了埃及伊蚊和白纹伊蚊中肠和整个身体的微生物组成。

结果

共鉴定出 341 个 OTUs,结果表明,在埃及伊蚊和白纹伊蚊中,变形菌门是优势门,甲基杆菌属是优势属。埃及伊蚊和白纹伊蚊雌雄个体的整个身体的细菌多样性和群落结构相似。相反,埃及伊蚊和白纹伊蚊雌雄个体的细菌组成有显著差异。NMDS 分析、UPGMA 分析、多样性指数和 OTU 分布表明,中肠微生物群的组成和结构相似,但埃及伊蚊和白纹伊蚊整个身体的结构明显不同。功能预测分析显示,代谢和环境信息处理是水平 1 中主要的 KEGG 途径。我们的研究表明,雌性白纹伊蚊和埃及伊蚊中肠微生物群(16 个水平 2 和 24 个水平 3)和整个身体(33 个水平 2 和 248 个水平 3)之间存在显著不同的水平 2 和 3 KEGG 途径。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,在相同实验室中饲养的埃及伊蚊和白纹伊蚊携带相似的肠道细菌微生物组,但整个身体的微生物组不同,这表明成年蚊子的肠道微生物群是由环境决定的,而与宿主基因型无关,但整个身体的微生物群更多地由遗传决定。我们的研究结果提高了对埃及伊蚊和白纹伊蚊整个和部分组织中微生物组的认识。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37d5/8626967/6d926fc310c0/13071_2021_5050_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37d5/8626967/69a44890edbd/13071_2021_5050_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37d5/8626967/dbc5e01e2914/13071_2021_5050_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37d5/8626967/7195c2c8ed13/13071_2021_5050_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37d5/8626967/c18b210c9f28/13071_2021_5050_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37d5/8626967/7b964a25bb32/13071_2021_5050_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37d5/8626967/22c9e867b5f6/13071_2021_5050_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37d5/8626967/851d1bd83e82/13071_2021_5050_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37d5/8626967/6d926fc310c0/13071_2021_5050_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37d5/8626967/69a44890edbd/13071_2021_5050_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37d5/8626967/dbc5e01e2914/13071_2021_5050_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37d5/8626967/7195c2c8ed13/13071_2021_5050_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37d5/8626967/c18b210c9f28/13071_2021_5050_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37d5/8626967/7b964a25bb32/13071_2021_5050_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37d5/8626967/22c9e867b5f6/13071_2021_5050_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37d5/8626967/851d1bd83e82/13071_2021_5050_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37d5/8626967/6d926fc310c0/13071_2021_5050_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Bacterial composition of midgut and entire body of laboratory colonies of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus from Southern China.中国南方地区实验室饲养的埃及伊蚊和白纹伊蚊中肠和全虫体的细菌组成。
Parasit Vectors. 2021 Nov 27;14(1):586. doi: 10.1186/s13071-021-05050-4.
2
Diversity of midgut bacteria in larvae and females of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus from Gampaha District, Sri Lanka.斯里兰卡加姆波哈区埃及伊蚊和白纹伊蚊幼虫和雌蚊中肠细菌的多样性。
Parasit Vectors. 2021 Aug 28;14(1):433. doi: 10.1186/s13071-021-04900-5.
3
Diverse laboratory colonies of Aedes aegypti harbor the same adult midgut bacterial microbiome.不同实验室饲养的埃及伊蚊种群拥有相同的成年中肠细菌微生物组。
Parasit Vectors. 2018 Mar 27;11(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-2780-1.
4
Molecular characterization of midgut microbiota of Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti from Arunachal Pradesh, India.印度阿鲁纳恰尔邦白纹伊蚊和埃及伊蚊中肠微生物群的分子特征
Parasit Vectors. 2015 Dec 18;8:641. doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-1252-0.
5
Characterization of the reproductive tract bacterial microbiota of virgin, mated, and blood-fed Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus females.鉴定处女、交配和吸血后的埃及伊蚊和白纹伊蚊雌性的生殖道细菌微生物组。
Parasit Vectors. 2021 Dec 1;14(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s13071-021-05093-7.
6
Use of MALDI-TOF MS to identify the culturable midgut microbiota of laboratory and wild mosquitoes.利用 MALDI-TOF MS 鉴定实验室和野生蚊子的可培养中肠微生物群。
Acta Trop. 2019 Dec;200:105174. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2019.105174. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
7
Gut Bacterial Diversity of Field and Laboratory-Reared Populations of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.巴西里约热内卢田间和实验室饲养种群的肠道细菌多样性。
Viruses. 2023 May 31;15(6):1309. doi: 10.3390/v15061309.
8
Comparative analysis of midgut bacterial communities in Chikungunya virus-infected and non-infected Aedes aegypti Thai laboratory strain mosquitoes.基孔肯雅热病毒感染和未感染的泰国实验室埃及伊蚊中肠细菌群落的比较分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 11;14(1):10814. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61027-0.
9
Laboratory colonization by Dirofilaria immitis alters the microbiome of female Aedes aegypti mosquitoes.实验室中感染犬恶丝虫会改变埃及伊蚊雌蚊的微生物组。
Parasit Vectors. 2020 Jul 13;13(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s13071-020-04218-8.
10
The environment and species affect gut bacteria composition in laboratory co-cultured Anopheles gambiae and Aedes albopictus mosquitoes.环境和物种会影响实验室共培养的冈比亚按蚊和白纹伊蚊肠道细菌的组成。
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 25;10(1):3352. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60075-6.

引用本文的文献

1
The Symbiotic Bacterial Profile of Laboratory-Reared and Field-Caught Mosquitoes from Greece.来自希腊的实验室饲养和野外捕获蚊子的共生细菌谱
Microorganisms. 2025 Jun 26;13(7):1486. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13071486.
2
Stochastic processes govern gut bacterial community assembly in a Schistosoma mansoni-transmitting snail, Biomphalaria straminea.随机过程控制着曼氏血吸虫传播螺类——淡黄巴蜗牛肠道细菌群落的组装。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025 Feb 5;19(2):e0012828. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012828. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Mosquitoes Reared in Nearby Insectaries at the Same Institution Have Significantly Divergent Microbiomes.

本文引用的文献

1
Microbial communities of the house fly Musca domestica vary with geographical location and habitat.家蝇(Musca domestica)的微生物群落随地理位置和栖息地而变化。
Microbiome. 2019 Nov 8;7(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0748-9.
2
Incompatible and sterile insect techniques combined eliminate mosquitoes.不合配不育昆虫技术结合消灭蚊子。
Nature. 2019 Aug;572(7767):56-61. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1407-9. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
3
Factors shaping the gut bacterial community assembly in two main Colombian malaria vectors.影响哥伦比亚两种主要疟疾传播媒介肠道细菌群落组装的因素。
在同一机构附近昆虫饲养室饲养的蚊子具有显著不同的微生物群落。
Environ Microbiol. 2025 Jan;27(1):e70027. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.70027.
4
Mosquitoes reared in distinct insectaries within an institution in close spatial proximity possess significantly divergent microbiomes.在同一机构内空间距离相近的不同昆虫饲养室中饲养的蚊子,其微生物群落存在显著差异。
bioRxiv. 2024 Aug 29:2024.08.28.610121. doi: 10.1101/2024.08.28.610121.
5
Characterization of the microbiome of Aedes albopictus populations in different habitats from Spain and São Tomé.不同生境中来自西班牙和圣多美伊蚊种群的微生物组特征。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 4;14(1):20545. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71507-y.
6
Innate immunity in mosquitoes: from pathogen resistance to shaping the microbiota.蚊虫先天免疫:从病原体抵抗到塑造微生物组。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 May 6;379(1901):20230063. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0063. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
7
A tangled threesome: understanding arbovirus infection in spp. and the effect of the mosquito microbiota.一个复杂的三角关系:了解[物种名称]中的虫媒病毒感染以及蚊子微生物群的影响。 (注:原文中“spp.”表述有误,应为具体的物种名称,这里按通用翻译方式给出译文)
Front Microbiol. 2024 Jan 3;14:1287519. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1287519. eCollection 2023.
8
Intrinsic factors driving mosquito vector competence and viral evolution: a review.内在因素驱动蚊虫媒介效能和病毒进化:综述。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023 Dec 21;13:1330600. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1330600. eCollection 2023.
9
Core gut microbes Cloacibacterium and Aeromonas associated with different gastropod species could be persistently transmitted across multiple generations.核心肠道微生物 Cloacibacterium 和 Aeromonas 与不同的腹足纲物种相关,可在多个世代中持续传播。
Microbiome. 2023 Nov 29;11(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s40168-023-01700-0.
10
Metagenomic Analysis Reveals Variations in Gut Microbiomes of the -Transmitting Snails and .宏基因组分析揭示了传播血吸虫的钉螺肠道微生物群的差异。
Microorganisms. 2023 Sep 28;11(10):2419. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11102419.
Microbiome. 2018 Aug 27;6(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0528-y.
4
Coral Bacterial-Core Abundance and Network Complexity as Proxies for Anthropogenic Pollution.珊瑚细菌核心丰度和网络复杂性作为人为污染的指标
Front Microbiol. 2018 Apr 27;9:833. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00833. eCollection 2018.
5
Low-abundant bacteria drive compositional changes in the gut microbiota after dietary alteration.低丰度细菌驱动饮食改变后肠道微生物组的组成变化。
Microbiome. 2018 May 10;6(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0469-5.
6
Molecular characterization of chikungunya virus causing the 2017 outbreak in Dhaka, Bangladesh.引起2017年孟加拉国达卡基孔肯雅热疫情的基孔肯雅病毒的分子特征分析。
New Microbes New Infect. 2018 Mar 28;24:14-16. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2018.03.007. eCollection 2018 Jul.
7
Factors contributing to and strategies to combat emerging arboviruses.促成新兴虫媒病毒出现的因素和应对策略。
Glob Public Health. 2018 Dec;13(12):1846-1852. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2018.1464588. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
8
The mosquito holobiont: fresh insight into mosquito-microbiota interactions.蚊子整体共生体:蚊子-微生物组相互作用的新见解。
Microbiome. 2018 Mar 20;6(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0435-2.
9
Environment dominates over host genetics in shaping human gut microbiota.环境在塑造人类肠道微生物群方面优于宿主遗传学。
Nature. 2018 Mar 8;555(7695):210-215. doi: 10.1038/nature25973. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
10
Current and future distribution of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region.世界卫生组织东地中海区域埃及伊蚊和白纹伊蚊(双翅目:蚊科)的当前和未来分布。
Int J Health Geogr. 2018 Feb 14;17(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12942-018-0125-0.