Department of Agricultural Economics, Mississippi State University, PO Box 5187, Mississippi State, MS 39762. Email:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Sociology and Education, Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2021 Dec 2;18:E99. doi: 10.5888/pcd18.210173.
The Mississippi Delta is predominantly rural and ranks among the US regions with the highest obesity rates. Throughout the US, rural and low-income communities have limited access to healthy foods. Given the interrelation between the quality of the food environment and the healthfulness of diets and obesity rates, the food environment is an important public health concern in these communities.
We conducted a retail assessment in July 2019 in the Delta region of Mississippi and evaluated prices and availability of healthy foods at Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-accepting retail establishments using the validated Market Basket Assessment Tool. We used regression analysis to identify differences in prices and availability of healthy foods across food retail formats.
The healthy foods availability and quality score for convenience stores, which comprise the highest proportion of store formats in the region, was 70% lower than for supermarkets. Compared with the prices at supermarkets, the prices at convenience stores were 48% higher for grains, 35% higher for fruit and vegetables, 73% higher for meats, and 95% higher for beans, seeds, and nuts. The healthfulness of foods available at dollar stores was also lower than the healthfulness at supermarkets, but prices were generally similar.
The availability of supermarkets and grocery stores was limited in the study area, but the concentration of convenience stores was high. Overall, access and affordability of healthy foods were restricted in the counties studied; these findings are useful for intervention development.
密西西比三角洲主要是农村地区,其肥胖率位居美国最高之列。在美国,农村和低收入社区获得健康食品的机会有限。鉴于食品环境质量与饮食健康和肥胖率之间的相互关系,食品环境是这些社区的一个重要公共卫生关注点。
我们于 2019 年 7 月在密西西比三角洲地区进行了一项零售评估,使用经过验证的市场篮子评估工具评估了接受补充营养援助计划的零售场所的健康食品的价格和供应情况。我们使用回归分析来确定不同食品零售形式之间健康食品价格和供应的差异。
便利商店(该地区商店形式中占比最高)的健康食品供应和质量评分为 70%,低于超市。与超市的价格相比,便利店的谷物价格高出 48%,水果和蔬菜高出 35%,肉类高出 73%,豆类、种子和坚果高出 95%。一元店供应的食品的健康程度也低于超市,但价格通常相似。
研究区域的超市和杂货店供应有限,但便利店集中程度较高。总体而言,在所研究的县,健康食品的可及性和可负担性受到限制;这些发现对干预措施的发展很有用。