Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical center, Bronx, New York, USA.
Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Alzheimers Dement. 2021 Nov;17(11):1855-1867. doi: 10.1002/alz.12491. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
We aimed to evaluate the value of ATN biomarker classification system (amyloid beta [A], pathologic tau [T], and neurodegeneration [N]) for predicting conversion from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to dementia. In a sample of people with MCI (n = 415) we assessed predictive performance of ATN classification using empirical knowledge-based cut-offs for each component of ATN and compared it to two data-driven approaches, logistic regression and RUSBoost machine learning classifiers, which used continuous clinical or biomarker scores. In data-driven approaches, we identified ATN features that distinguish normals from individuals with dementia and used them to classify persons with MCI into dementia-like and normal groups. Both data-driven classification methods performed better than the empirical cut-offs for ATN biomarkers in predicting conversion to dementia. Classifiers that used clinical features performed as well as classifiers that used ATN biomarkers for prediction of progression to dementia. We discuss that data-driven modeling approaches can improve our ability to predict disease progression and might have implications in future clinical trials.
我们旨在评估 ATN 生物标志物分类系统(β淀粉样蛋白 [A]、病理性tau [T]和神经退行性变 [N])在预测轻度认知障碍 (MCI) 向痴呆转化中的价值。在 MCI 患者样本(n=415)中,我们使用 ATN 各组成部分的经验知识为依据的截断值评估了 ATN 分类的预测性能,并将其与两种数据驱动方法(逻辑回归和 RUSBoost 机器学习分类器)进行了比较,这两种方法使用了连续的临床或生物标志物评分。在数据驱动方法中,我们确定了能够区分正常人和痴呆患者的 ATN 特征,并使用这些特征将 MCI 患者分为痴呆样和正常组。两种数据驱动分类方法在预测向痴呆转化方面的表现均优于 ATN 生物标志物的经验截断值。使用临床特征的分类器与使用 ATN 生物标志物的分类器在预测向痴呆进展方面一样有效。我们讨论了数据驱动建模方法可以提高我们预测疾病进展的能力,并且可能对未来的临床试验有影响。