Simm Jaak, Humbeck Lina, Zalewski Adam, Sturm Noe, Heyndrickx Wouter, Moreau Yves, Beck Bernd, Schuffenhauer Ansgar
KU Leuven, ESAT-STADIUS, Kasteelpark Arenberg 10, 3001, Heverlee, Belgium.
Medicinal Chemistry Department, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Birkendorfer Str. 65, 88397, Biberach an der Riss, Germany.
J Cheminform. 2021 Dec 7;13(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13321-021-00576-2.
With the increase in applications of machine learning methods in drug design and related fields, the challenge of designing sound test sets becomes more and more prominent. The goal of this challenge is to have a realistic split of chemical structures (compounds) between training, validation and test set such that the performance on the test set is meaningful to infer the performance in a prospective application. This challenge is by its own very interesting and relevant, but is even more complex in a federated machine learning approach where multiple partners jointly train a model under privacy-preserving conditions where chemical structures must not be shared between the different participating parties. In this work we discuss three methods which provide a splitting of a data set and are applicable in a federated privacy-preserving setting, namely: a. locality-sensitive hashing (LSH), b. sphere exclusion clustering, c. scaffold-based binning (scaffold network). For evaluation of these splitting methods we consider the following quality criteria (compared to random splitting): bias in prediction performance, classification label and data imbalance, similarity distance between the test and training set compounds. The main findings of the paper are a. both sphere exclusion clustering and scaffold-based binning result in high quality splitting of the data sets, b. in terms of compute costs sphere exclusion clustering is very expensive in the case of federated privacy-preserving setting.
随着机器学习方法在药物设计及相关领域的应用不断增加,设计合理测试集的挑战变得越来越突出。这一挑战的目标是在训练集、验证集和测试集之间对化学结构(化合物)进行合理划分,以便测试集上的性能对于推断预期应用中的性能具有意义。这个挑战本身就非常有趣且具有相关性,但在联邦机器学习方法中更为复杂,在这种方法中,多个合作伙伴在隐私保护条件下联合训练模型,不同参与方之间不得共享化学结构。在这项工作中,我们讨论了三种适用于联邦隐私保护设置的数据集划分方法,即:a. 局部敏感哈希(Locality-Sensitive Hashing,LSH);b. 球排除聚类;c. 基于支架的装箱(支架网络)。为了评估这些划分方法,我们考虑以下质量标准(与随机划分相比):预测性能偏差、分类标签和数据不平衡、测试集与训练集化合物之间的相似性距离。本文的主要发现是:a. 球排除聚类和基于支架的装箱都能实现数据集的高质量划分;b. 在联邦隐私保护设置的情况下,就计算成本而言,球排除聚类非常昂贵。