Department of Epidemiology & Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Uniersiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health, de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Dec 11;20(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01592-2.
Due to societal changes and changes in the availability of health promoting factors, explanatory factors of socioeconomic inequalities in health (SIH) may change with time. We investigate differences in the relative importance of behavioural, social and psychological factors for explaining inequalities in physical performance between three birth cohorts.
Data came from N = 988, N = 1002, and N = 1023 adults aged 55-64 years, collected in 1992, 2002 and 2012 as part of the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. Physical performance was measured by three performance tests. We included lifestyle factors (physical activity, smoking, alcohol use and Body Mass Index (BMI)); social factors (network size, network complexity, divorce, social support); and psychological factors (mastery, self-efficacy and neuroticism). In multi-group mediation models, we tested whether the strength of indirect effects from socioeconomic position (SEP) via the explanatory factors to health differed between birth cohorts. Stronger indirect effects indicate an increase in the importance; weaker indirect effects indicate a decrease in importance.
Absolute SIH were present and similar across cohorts. The strength of indirect effects of SEP on physical performance through smoking, binge alcohol use, emotional support and mastery increased across cohorts. The indirect effects of BMI, network size, self-efficacy and neuroticism were similar across cohorts.
Inequalities in smoking, binge alcohol use, emotional support and mastery may have become more important for explaining SIH in recent cohorts of middle-aged adults. Policies that aim to reduce socioeconomic inequalities may need to adapt their targets of intervention to changing mechanisms in order to reduce SIH.
由于社会变化和促进健康因素的可获得性的变化,健康的社会经济不平等(SIH)的解释因素可能随时间而变化。我们研究了行为、社会和心理因素在解释三个出生队列之间身体表现不平等方面的相对重要性的差异。
数据来自 N=988、N=1002 和 N=1023 名年龄在 55-64 岁的成年人,分别于 1992 年、2002 年和 2012 年作为阿姆斯特丹纵向老龄化研究的一部分收集。身体表现通过三项表现测试进行测量。我们包括生活方式因素(体育活动、吸烟、饮酒和体重指数(BMI));社会因素(网络规模、网络复杂性、离婚、社会支持);和心理因素(掌握、自我效能和神经质)。在多组中介模型中,我们测试了社会经济地位(SEP)通过解释因素对健康的间接效应的强度是否在出生队列之间存在差异。更强的间接效应表明重要性增加;较弱的间接效应表明重要性降低。
绝对 SIH 在所有队列中均存在且相似。SEP 对身体表现的间接影响通过吸烟、狂饮、情感支持和掌握的强度随着队列的增加而增加。BMI、网络规模、自我效能和神经质的间接效应在所有队列中相似。
在最近的中年成年人队列中,吸烟、狂饮、情感支持和掌握方面的不平等可能对解释 SIH 变得更加重要。旨在减少社会经济不平等的政策可能需要调整其干预目标,以适应不断变化的机制,从而减少 SIH。