Veenhoven Ruut
Erasmus Happiness Economics Research Organization, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Optentia Research Program, Noth-West University, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa.
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 25;12:758623. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.758623. eCollection 2021.
The effect of positive psychological interventions (PPIs) is mostly assessed using self-report measures of positive mental health. These measures are problematic because (1) the content addressed is often not clear, (2) different scales are used to assess different notions of positive mental health, which impedes comparability, (3) the concept of positive mental health involves objective capabilities which are not well measurable using subjective self-estimates, and (4) the concept behind the measures denotes presumed chances for adaptation to life rather than adaptation as such. Therefore, we should also measure the effect of PPIs using life-satisfaction, which is (a) a clear-cut concept and as such tells us what an intervention brings about, (b) is well measurable using self-reports, since it is a subjective concept, (c) it allows better comparability across studies, and (d) it indicates actual adaptation to life instead of strengthening of presumed of chances for adaptation.
积极心理干预(PPI)的效果大多是通过对积极心理健康的自我报告测量来评估的。这些测量存在问题,原因如下:(1)所涉及的内容往往不明确;(2)使用不同的量表来评估积极心理健康的不同概念,这妨碍了可比性;(3)积极心理健康的概念涉及客观能力,而使用主观自我评估难以很好地衡量这些能力;(4)这些测量背后的概念表示假定的生活适应机会,而非适应本身。因此,我们还应该使用生活满意度来衡量PPI的效果,这是因为:(a)它是一个明确的概念,能告诉我们一项干预措施带来了什么;(b)作为一个主观概念,使用自我报告很容易测量;(c)它能使不同研究之间具有更好的可比性;(d)它表明了对生活的实际适应,而不是增强假定的适应机会。