Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Human Flourishing Program, Harvard Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 14;10:824960. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.824960. eCollection 2022.
Human flourishing is a multidimensional concept characterized by a state of complete wellbeing. However, much of the prior research on wellbeing has principally focused on population averages assessed using a single item of wellbeing. This study examined trends in population averages and inequalities for a multidimensional index of wellbeing and compared emergent patterns with those found for Cantril's ladder, a measure of life satisfaction commonly used as a unidimensional index of wellbeing.
Data were from the Gallup World Poll from the years 2009 to 2019, a repeated cross-sectional survey of nationally representative samples comprising ~1.2 million individuals from 162 countries. We assessed five domains of flourishing: (1) happiness, (2) health, (3) purpose, (4) character, and (5) social relationships. We used the Gini Index to estimate inequalities in wellbeing within populations. We examined and compared country ranking, global and region-specific trajectories of mean and inequality, and relationships with age for flourishing and Cantril's ladder.
Although all trends were highly correlated across the two metrics of wellbeing, we identified distinct patterns in flourishing concerning geography, time, and age relationships that were not observed for Cantril's ladder. Temporal trends and age relationships were different across domains of flourishing. Evidence of changing inequalities in wellbeing was also found, even when population averages were high or stable over time.
Comprehensive measures of wellbeing are needed to capture the complex and changing patterns of wellbeing both within and across populations.
人类繁荣是一个多维度的概念,其特点是完全健康的状态。然而,之前关于幸福感的研究主要集中在使用幸福感单一指标评估的人口平均值上。本研究考察了多维幸福感指数的人口平均值和不平等趋势,并将新兴模式与常用作幸福感单一指标的 Cantril 阶梯的模式进行了比较。
数据来自 2009 年至 2019 年的盖洛普世界民意调查,这是一项对 162 个国家的具有代表性的全国样本进行的重复横断面调查,包括约 120 万人。我们评估了繁荣的五个领域:(1)幸福,(2)健康,(3)目的,(4)性格和(5)社会关系。我们使用基尼指数来衡量人口内部幸福感的不平等。我们研究并比较了繁荣和 Cantril 阶梯的国家排名、全球和区域特定的平均值和不平等轨迹,以及与年龄的关系。
尽管两种幸福感指标的所有趋势都高度相关,但我们在繁荣方面发现了与地理、时间和年龄关系有关的独特模式,而在 Cantril 阶梯方面则没有观察到这些模式。繁荣的各个领域的时间趋势和年龄关系都不同。即使在一段时间内人口平均值较高或稳定,也发现了幸福感不平等变化的证据。
需要全面的幸福感衡量标准来捕捉人口内部和之间幸福感的复杂和变化模式。