Frisone Fabio, Sicari Federica, Settineri Salvatore, Merlo Emanuele Maria
Department of Cognitive Sciences, Psychology, Educational and Cultural Studies (COSPECS), University of Messina, Italy.
CRISCAT (International Research Center for Theoretical and Applied Cognitive Sciences), University of Messina and Universitary Consortium of Eastern Mediterranean, Noto (CUMO), Italy.
Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2021 Apr;18(2):91-100. doi: 10.36131/cnfioritieditore20210203.
Work-related stress typically occurs due to particularly challenging dynamics, risks and pressure. Prolonged exposure to stress may cause serious consequences on psychophysical well-being. The current study was conducted to reexamine the clinical instruments useful for evaluating the risk factors and to examine two closely linked dimensions, which may constitute protective factors such as coping strategies and satisfaction.
Through a narrative review of the scientific literature of the last 5 years, carried out through the PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases, the most relevant clinical instruments used in the evaluation of stress, job satisfaction and coping strategies were examined.
Based on the considered inclusion criteria, 142 articles were selected, and 10 of the most used psycho-diagnostic instruments were identified for the evaluation of the three dimensions. The selected assessment instruments were deeply discussed in order to highlight strengths and limitations.
A variety of studies used a range of psycho-diagnostic tools in order to measure stress, coping strategies and job satisfaction. However, their integration is necessary to guarantee a complete evaluation protocol.
工作相关压力通常由于极具挑战性的动态因素、风险和压力而产生。长期暴露于压力之下可能会对身心健康造成严重后果。本研究旨在重新审视有助于评估风险因素的临床工具，并考察两个紧密相关的维度，这两个维度可能构成诸如应对策略和满意度等保护因素。
通过对过去5年科学文献进行叙述性综述，该综述通过PubMed、科学网和Scopus数据库进行，考察了用于评估压力、工作满意度和应对策略的最相关临床工具。
根据既定的纳入标准，挑选出142篇文章，并确定了10种最常用的心理诊断工具用于评估这三个维度。对所选评估工具进行了深入讨论，以突出其优点和局限性。
各种研究使用了一系列心理诊断工具来测量压力、应对策略和工作满意度。然而，有必要将它们整合起来以确保有一个完整的评估方案。
