Mathias Kaaren, Rawat Meenal, Philip Sharad, Grills Nathan
Burans, Herbertpur Christian Hospital, Attenbagh, Herbertpur, Uttarakhand, India.
Psychiatric Rehabilitation Department, NIMHANS, Bengaluru, India.
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Dec 17;19(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01345-7.
The COVID-19 crisis in India negatively impacted mental health due to both the disease and the harsh lockdown, yet there are almost no qualitative studies describing mental health impacts or the strategies of resilience used, and in particular, no reports from the most vulnerable groups. This study aimed to examine the acute mental health impacts of the COVID-19 crisis as well as coping strategies employed by disadvantaged community members in North India.
We used an intersectional lens for this qualitative study set in rural Tehri Garwhal and urban Dehradun districts of Uttarakhand, India. In-depth interviews were conducted in May 2020 during lockdown, by phone and in person using purposive selection, with people with disabilities, people living in slums with psychosocial disabilities and widows (total n = 24). We used the framework method for analysis following steps of transcription and translation, familiarisation, coding, developing and then applying a framework, charting and then interpreting data.
The participants with compounded disadvantage had almost no access to mobile phones, health messaging or health care and experienced extreme mental distress and despair, alongside hunger and loss of income. Under the realms of intrapersonal, interpersonal and social, six themes related to mental distress emerged: feeling overwhelmed and bewildered, feeling distressed and despairing, feeling socially isolated, increased events of othering and discrimination, and experiencing intersectional disadvantage. The six themes summarising coping strategies in the COVID-19 crisis were: finding sense and meaning, connecting with others, looking for positive ways forward, innovating with new practices, supporting others individually and collectively, and engaging with the natural world.
People intersectionally disadvantaged by their social identity experienced high levels of mental distress during the COVID-19 crisis, yet did not collapse, and instead described diverse and innovative strategies which enabled them to cope through the COVID-19 lockdown. This study illustrates that research using an intersectional lens is valuable to design equitable policy such as the need for access to digital resources, and that disaggregated data is needed to address social inequities at the intersection of poverty, disability, caste, religious discrimination and gender inherent in the COVID-19 pandemic in India.
印度的新冠疫情危机因疾病本身和严格的封锁措施对心理健康产生了负面影响,但几乎没有定性研究描述其对心理健康的影响或所采用的恢复力策略,尤其是最弱势群体的相关报告。本研究旨在调查新冠疫情危机对心理健康的急性影响以及印度北部弱势社区成员所采用的应对策略。
在印度北阿坎德邦的农村特里加瓦尔和城市德拉敦地区开展了这项定性研究,我们采用了交叉性视角。2020年5月封锁期间,通过电话和面对面访谈,采用目的抽样法,对残疾人、患有心理社会残疾的贫民窟居民和寡妇(共24人)进行了深入访谈。我们采用框架法进行分析,步骤包括转录与翻译、熟悉、编码、制定并应用框架、绘制图表以及解读数据。
处于多重不利地位的参与者几乎无法使用手机、获取健康信息或获得医疗保健,他们经历了极度的精神痛苦和绝望,同时还面临饥饿和收入损失。在个人、人际和社会层面,出现了与精神痛苦相关的六个主题:感到不堪重负和困惑、感到痛苦和绝望、感到社会孤立、遭受更多的“他者化”和歧视事件,以及经历交叉性不利地位。总结新冠疫情危机应对策略的六个主题是:找到意义和目的、与他人建立联系、寻找积极的前进方向、创新新做法、个人和集体支持他人,以及与自然世界互动。
因社会身份而处于交叉性不利地位的人群在新冠疫情危机期间经历了高度的精神痛苦,但并未崩溃,反而描述了各种多样且创新的策略,使他们能够应对新冠疫情封锁。本研究表明,采用交叉性视角进行研究对于设计公平政策(如获取数字资源的必要性)很有价值,并且需要分类数据来解决印度新冠疫情大流行中贫困、残疾、种姓、宗教歧视和性别交叉所固有的社会不平等问题。