Singh Devika, Fusch Gerhard
Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, CAN.
Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, CAN.
Cureus. 2021 Nov 8;13(11):e19353. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19353. eCollection 2021 Nov.
Background and objective Excessive noise in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) may lead to serious long-term effects on hearing and sensory development in newborns. As such, the maximum allowed noise level is 45 A-weighted decibels (dBA). Studies regarding noise exposure to ventilated preterm infants show inconsistent results; however, these studies also vary considerably in their methodology in terms of noise ascertainment. We hypothesized that the study methodology can significantly influence data quality when measuring noise levels. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether the variations in ventilator noise levels in NICUs could be a result of methodological differences in study designs. Methods A ventilator circuit was set up using nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) and high-frequency (HF) modes with nasal prongs. Noise levels were measured using a commercially calibrated noise meter. Three different scenarios were tested: (1) measurements were taken at different angles (0° to 180°), with 180° facing the end of the nasal prongs, without a mannequin, with the membrane/orifice of the noise meter placed 2 mm laterally from the prongs; (2) noise levels were measured at 180° at distances of 0-20 mm from the nasal prongs; (3) measurements were taken in the oral cavity of a life-size intubation mannequin of a newborn baby. Results Overall, the noise levels produced at different settings varied significantly, ranging from 45.7 dB to 82.2 dB. The average environmental background noise was 44.4 dB. Noise levels typically increased as the angle increased, with the highest noise level recorded at 180° for both HF and nCPAP modes, at 58.4 dB and 58.2 dB, respectively. Noise levels recorded at HF were slightly higher than nCPAP values. Furthermore, with regard to distance, the highest mean value, 82.2 dB, was recorded with the noise meter approximately 3 mm from the nasal prongs, and the lowest mean value, 47.6 dB, was recorded at ~20 mm. During trials with the mannequin, the lowest value, 50.1 dB, was recorded at the entrance of the mouth with slightly higher values being recorded within the oral cavity. Conclusion The results indicate that small changes in experimental settings, such as positioning and distance from the nasal prongs, can greatly influence noise levels, particularly above the recommended levels for neonates. These differences may be attributed to wind-generated noise. In summary, some study results are potentially influenced more by the study design than the device type or ventilator setting. We recommend further research and detailed reporting in the NICU to gain deeper insights into the topic.
背景与目的 新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)内的过度噪音可能会对新生儿的听力和感觉发育造成严重的长期影响。因此,允许的最大噪音水平为45 A加权分贝(dBA)。关于暴露于噪音环境中的机械通气早产儿的研究结果并不一致;然而,这些研究在噪音测定方法上也有很大差异。我们推测,在测量噪音水平时,研究方法可能会显著影响数据质量。在本研究中,我们旨在调查NICU中呼吸机噪音水平的差异是否可能是研究设计方法不同的结果。
方法 使用鼻持续气道正压通气(nCPAP)和带有鼻插管的高频(HF)模式设置一个呼吸机回路。使用经过商业校准的噪音计测量噪音水平。测试了三种不同的情况:(1)在不同角度(0°至180°)进行测量,180°时面对鼻插管末端,不使用人体模型,噪音计的膜/孔口位于插管侧面2 mm处;(2)在距离鼻插管0 - 20 mm处的180°测量噪音水平;(3)在一个新生儿真人大小的插管人体模型的口腔内进行测量。
结果 总体而言,不同设置下产生的噪音水平差异显著,范围为45.7 dB至82.2 dB。平均环境背景噪音为44.4 dB。噪音水平通常随着角度的增加而升高,HF模式和nCPAP模式在180°时记录到的噪音水平最高,分别为58.4 dB和58.2 dB。HF模式记录的噪音水平略高于nCPAP模式的值。此外,就距离而言,噪音计距离鼻插管约3 mm时记录到的最高平均值为82.2 dB,在约20 mm处记录到的最低平均值为47.6 dB。在使用人体模型的试验中,在口腔入口处记录到的最低值为50.1 dB,口腔内的值略高。
结论 结果表明,实验设置的微小变化,如位置和与鼻插管的距离,会极大地影响噪音水平,尤其是高于新生儿推荐水平的噪音。这些差异可能归因于风产生的噪音。总之,一些研究结果可能更多地受到研究设计的影响,而不是设备类型或呼吸机设置。我们建议在NICU进行进一步的研究和详细报告,以更深入地了解该主题。