Division of Pediatrics and Neonatal Critical Care, "A.Beclere" Medical Center, Paris Saclay University Hospitals, APHP, Paris, France.
Division of Pediatrics and Neonatal Critical Care, "A.Beclere" Medical Center, Paris Saclay University Hospitals, APHP, Paris, France; and Physiopathology and Therapeutic Innovation Unit-INSERM U999, Paris Saclay University, Paris, France.
Respir Care. 2023 Nov 25;68(12):1693-1700. doi: 10.4187/respcare.10989.
Insufficient data are available about the noise produced by modern neonatal ventilators. We aimed to measure their noise under different ventilatory modes and parameters.
This was a bench study measuring the noise produced by 9 neonatal ventilators set in conventional or high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV), nasal mask-delivered CPAP with variable- or continuous-flow configuration, or bi-level positive airway pressure (considered as noninvasive ventilation [NIV]). Conventional ventilation and HFOV were tested in 2 distinct settings with moderate or higher parameters. Sound measurements were performed inside and outside an incubator mimicking the clinical setting and using a high-end meter meeting the international ISO 226:2003 standard.
Four ventilators remained below the internationally recommended safety threshold but only for measurements outside the incubator. Conventional ventilation (49.1 [3.4] dBA) and HFOV (56.3 [5.2] dBA) were the least and most noisy respiratory support technique, respectively. Noise was greater inside than outside the incubators ( < .0001) and different between the ventilators ( < .0001); better results were achieved by Servo-u and Fabian family devices for conventional ventilation; by fabian HFO for HFOV; and by Servo-u, VN500, and fabian family devices for CPAP and NIV. Noise levels were similar when using moderate or higher parameters in conventional ventilation ( = .81) and in HFOV ( = .45).
Modern ventilators often produce relevant noise, independent of the respiratory support modality, with acceptable noise levels being measured only outside the incubator. Better results were achieved with Servo-u, VN500, and Fabian family devices.
现代新生儿呼吸机产生的噪声数据不足。我们旨在测量其在不同通气模式和参数下的噪声。
这是一项在常规或高频振荡通气(HFOV)、带有可变或连续流量配置的鼻罩 CPAP 或双水平气道正压(被认为是非侵入性通气[NIV])下,对 9 种新生儿呼吸机产生的噪声进行测量的台架研究。常规通气和 HFOV 在中等或更高参数的 2 种不同设置下进行测试。在模拟临床环境的培养箱内和外使用符合国际 ISO 226:2003 标准的高端仪表进行声音测量。
有 4 种呼吸机仍低于国际推荐的安全阈值,但仅在培养箱外测量时如此。常规通气(49.1[3.4]dBA)和 HFOV(56.3[5.2]dBA)分别是最安静和最嘈杂的呼吸支持技术。培养箱内的噪声大于培养箱外(<0.0001),不同呼吸机之间的噪声也不同(<0.0001);对于常规通气,Servo-u 和 Fabian 系列设备效果更好;对于 HFOV,fabian HFO 效果更好;对于 CPAP 和 NIV,Servo-u、VN500 和 Fabian 系列设备效果更好。在常规通气中使用中等或更高参数时(=0.81)和在 HFOV 中(=0.45),噪声水平相似。
现代呼吸机通常会产生相关噪声,与呼吸支持方式无关,但仅在培养箱外才能测量到可接受的噪声水平。Servo-u、VN500 和 Fabian 系列设备的效果更好。