Goekoop Rutger, de Kleijn Roy
Parnassia Group, PsyQ Parnassia Academy, Department of Anxiety Disorders, Early Detection and Intervention Team (EDIT), Lijnbaan 4, 2512 VA Den Haag, The Netherlands.
Cognitive Psychology Unit, Institute of Psychology & Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, 2333 AK Leiden, The Netherlands.
Entropy (Basel). 2021 Dec 20;23(12):1701. doi: 10.3390/e23121701.
What do bacteria, cells, organs, people, and social communities have in common? At first sight, perhaps not much. They involve totally different agents and scale levels of observation. On second thought, however, perhaps they share everything. A growing body of literature suggests that living systems at different scale levels of observation follow the same architectural principles and process information in similar ways. Moreover, such systems appear to respond in similar ways to rising levels of stress, especially when stress levels approach near-lethal levels. To explain such communalities, we argue that all organisms (including humans) can be modeled as hierarchical Bayesian controls systems that are governed by the same biophysical principles. Such systems show generic changes when taxed beyond their ability to correct for environmental disturbances. Without exception, stressed organisms show rising levels of 'disorder' (randomness, unpredictability) in internal message passing and overt behavior. We argue that such changes can be explained by a collapse of allostatic (high-level integrative) control, which normally synchronizes activity of the various components of a living system to produce order. The selective overload and cascading failure of highly connected (hub) nodes flattens hierarchical control, producing maladaptive behavior. Thus, we present a theory according to which organic concepts such as stress, a loss of control, disorder, disease, and death can be operationalized in biophysical terms that apply to all scale levels of organization. Given the presumed universality of this mechanism, 'losing control' appears to involve the same process anywhere, whether involving bacteria succumbing to an antibiotic agent, people suffering from physical or mental disorders, or social systems slipping into warfare. On a practical note, measures of disorder may serve as early warning signs of system failure even when catastrophic failure is still some distance away.
细菌、细胞、器官、人以及社会群体有什么共同之处?乍一看,可能没什么。它们涉及完全不同的主体和观察尺度水平。然而,再仔细想想,也许它们有着共通之处。越来越多的文献表明,不同观察尺度水平的生命系统遵循相同的架构原则,并以相似的方式处理信息。此外,这类系统在面对压力水平上升时似乎会有相似的反应,尤其是当压力水平接近致命程度时。为了解释这些共性,我们认为所有生物体(包括人类)都可以被建模为受相同生物物理原理支配的分层贝叶斯控制系统。当这类系统承受的压力超出其纠正环境干扰的能力时,就会出现一般的变化。毫无例外,处于压力下的生物体在内部信息传递和公开行为中会表现出“无序”(随机性、不可预测性)水平的上升。我们认为,这种变化可以通过稳态(高级整合)控制的崩溃来解释,稳态控制通常会使生命系统的各个组成部分的活动同步以产生秩序。高度连接的(枢纽)节点的选择性过载和级联故障会使分层控制失效,从而产生适应不良的行为。因此,我们提出了一种理论,根据该理论,诸如压力、失控、无序、疾病和死亡等有机概念可以用适用于所有组织尺度水平的生物物理术语来进行操作化定义。鉴于这种机制的普遍性,“失控”在任何地方似乎都涉及相同的过程,无论是细菌屈服于抗生素、人患有身体或精神疾病,还是社会系统陷入战争。实际上,即使灾难性故障还很遥远,无序的度量也可能作为系统故障的早期预警信号。