D'Aurelio Roberta, Tothill Ibtisam E, Salbini Maria, Calò Francesca, Mazzotta Elisabetta, Malitesta Cosimino, Chianella Iva
Surface Engineering and Precision Centre, School of Aerospace, Transport and Manufacturing, Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedford MK43 0AL, UK.
Laboratorio di Chimica Analitica, Edificio Multipiano CSEEM A6., Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Biologiche ed Ambientali, Università del Salento, I-73100 Lecce, Italy.
Nanomaterials (Basel). 2021 Dec 11;11(12):3360. doi: 10.3390/nano11123360.
In this work we have compared two different sensing platforms for the detection of morphine as an example of a low molecular weight target analyte. For this, molecularly imprinted polymer nanoparticles (NanoMIP), synthesized with an affinity towards morphine, were attached to an electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and a quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) sensor. Assay design, sensors fabrication, analyte sensitivity and specificity were performed using similar methods. The results showed that the EIS sensor achieved a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.11 ng·mL, which is three orders of magnitude lower than the 0.19 µg·mL achieved using the QCM sensor. Both the EIS and the QCM sensors were found to be able to specifically detect morphine in a direct assay format. However, the QCM method required conjugation of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) to the small analyte (morphine) to amplify the signal and achieve a LOD in the µg·mL range. Conversely, the EIS sensor method was labor-intensive and required extensive data handling and processing, resulting in longer analysis times (~30-40 min). In addition, whereas the QCM enables visualization of the binding events between the target molecule and the sensor in real-time, the EIS method does not allow such a feature and measurements are taken post-binding. The work also highlighted the advantages of using QCM as an automated, rapid and multiplex sensor compared to the much simpler EIS platform used in this work, though, the QCM method will require sample preparation, especially when a sensitive (ng·mL) detection of a small analyte is needed.
在本研究中,我们比较了两种不同的传感平台,以检测吗啡作为低分子量目标分析物的示例。为此,合成了对吗啡具有亲和力的分子印迹聚合物纳米颗粒(NanoMIP),并将其附着到电化学阻抗谱(EIS)和石英晶体微天平(QCM)传感器上。使用相似的方法进行了分析设计、传感器制造、分析物灵敏度和特异性研究。结果表明,EIS传感器的检测限(LOD)为0.11 ng·mL,比使用QCM传感器获得的0.19 μg·mL低三个数量级。发现EIS和QCM传感器都能够以直接分析形式特异性检测吗啡。然而,QCM方法需要将金纳米颗粒(AuNPs)与小分析物(吗啡)结合以放大信号并实现μg·mL范围内的LOD。相反,EIS传感器方法劳动强度大,需要大量的数据处理,导致分析时间更长(约30 - 40分钟)。此外,QCM能够实时可视化目标分子与传感器之间的结合事件,而EIS方法不具备此功能,测量是在结合后进行的。该研究还强调了与本研究中使用的简单得多的EIS平台相比,使用QCM作为自动化、快速和多重传感器的优势,不过,QCM方法需要样品制备,特别是在需要对小分析物进行灵敏(ng·mL)检测时。