Fuh-Ngwa Valery, Zhou Yuan, Charlesworth Jac C, Ponsonby Anne-Louise, Simpson-Yap Steve, Lechner-Scott Jeannette, Taylor Bruce V
Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.
Developing Brain Division, The Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Brain Commun. 2021 Dec 4;3(4):fcab288. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcab288. eCollection 2021.
Our inability to reliably predict disease outcomes in multiple sclerosis remains an issue for clinicians and clinical trialists. This study aims to create, from available clinical, genetic and environmental factors; a clinical-environmental-genotypic prognostic index to predict the probability of new relapses and disability worsening. The analyses cohort included prospectively assessed multiple sclerosis cases ( = 253) with 2858 repeated observations measured over 10 years. = 219 had been diagnosed as relapsing-onset, while = 34 remained as clinically isolated syndrome by the 10th-year review. Genotype data were available for 199 genetic variants associated with multiple sclerosis risk. Penalized Cox regression models were used to select potential genetic variants and predict risk for relapses and/or worsening of disability. Multivariable Cox regression models with backward elimination were then used to construct clinical-environmental, genetic and clinical-environmental-genotypic prognostic index, respectively. Robust time-course predictions were obtained by Landmarking. To validate our models, Weibull calibration models were used, and the Chi-square statistics, Harrell's C-index and - were used to compare models. The predictive performance at diagnosis was evaluated using the Kullback-Leibler and Brier (dynamic) prediction error (reduction) curves. The combined index (clinical-environmental-genotypic) predicted a quadratic time-dynamic disease course in terms of worsening (HR = 2.74, CI: 2.00-3.76; - =0.64; C-index = 0.76), relapses (HR = 2.16, CI: 1.74-2.68; - = 0.91; C-index = 0.85), or both (HR = 3.32, CI: 1.88-5.86; - = 0.72; C-index = 0.77). The Kullback-Leibler and Brier curves suggested that for short-term prognosis (≤5 years from diagnosis), the clinical-environmental components of disease were more relevant, whereas the genetic components reduced the prediction errors only in the long-term (≥5 years from diagnosis). The combined components performed slightly better than the individual ones, although their prognostic sensitivities were largely modulated by the clinical-environmental components. We have created a clinical-environmental-genotypic prognostic index using relevant clinical, environmental, and genetic predictors, and obtained robust dynamic predictions for the probability of developing new relapses and worsening of symptoms in multiple sclerosis. Our prognostic index provides reliable information that is relevant for long-term prognostication and may be used as a selection criterion and risk stratification tool for clinical trials. Further work to investigate component interactions is required and to validate the index in independent data sets.
我们无法可靠地预测多发性硬化症的疾病转归,这对临床医生和临床试验人员来说仍是一个问题。本研究旨在根据现有的临床、遗传和环境因素,创建一个临床 - 环境 - 基因型预后指数,以预测新的复发和残疾恶化的可能性。分析队列包括前瞻性评估的多发性硬化症病例(n = 253),在10年期间进行了2858次重复观察。到第10年复查时,219例被诊断为复发型,而34例仍为临床孤立综合征。可获得与多发性硬化症风险相关的199个基因变异的基因型数据。使用惩罚Cox回归模型来选择潜在的基因变异,并预测复发和/或残疾恶化的风险。然后分别使用带有向后剔除的多变量Cox回归模型来构建临床 - 环境、遗传和临床 - 环境 - 基因型预后指数。通过地标法获得稳健的时间进程预测。为了验证我们的模型,使用了Weibull校准模型,并使用卡方统计量、Harrell's C指数和对数似然比来比较模型。使用Kullback - Leibler和Brier(动态)预测误差(减少)曲线评估诊断时的预测性能。综合指数(临床 - 环境 - 基因型)在残疾恶化(HR = 2.74,CI:2.00 - 3.76;对数似然比 = 0.64;C指数 = 0.76)、复发(HR = 2.16,CI:1.74 - 2.68;对数似然比 = 0.91;C指数 = 0.85)或两者(HR = 3.32,CI:1.88 - 5.86;对数似然比 = 0.72;C指数 = 0.77)方面预测了二次时间动态疾病进程。Kullback - Leibler和Brier曲线表明,对于短期预后(诊断后≤5年),疾病的临床 - 环境成分更相关,而遗传成分仅在长期(诊断后≥5年)降低预测误差。尽管其预后敏感性在很大程度上受临床 - 环境成分调节,但综合成分的表现略优于单个成分。我们使用相关的临床、环境和遗传预测因子创建了一个临床 - 环境 - 基因型预后指数,并获得了多发性硬化症中新发复发和症状恶化可能性的稳健动态预测。我们的预后指数提供了与长期预后相关的可靠信息,可作为临床试验的选择标准和风险分层工具。需要进一步开展工作来研究成分间的相互作用,并在独立数据集中验证该指数。