Oliveira Rafael, Brito João P, Loureiro Nuno, Padinha Vitor, Ferreira Bruno, Mendes Bruno
ESDRM-IPS - Sports Science School of Rio Maior - Polytechnic Institute of Santarém, Av. Dr. Mário Soares, Rio Maior 2040-413, Portugal; CIDESD - Research Centre in Sport Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development, Quinta de Prados, Edifício Ciências de Desporto, Vila Real 5001-801, Portugal; CIEQV - Life Quality Research Centre, Complexo Andaluz, Apartado 279, Santarém 2001-904, Portugal.
ESDRM-IPS - Sports Science School of Rio Maior - Polytechnic Institute of Santarém, Av. Dr. Mário Soares, Rio Maior 2040-413, Portugal; CIEQV - Life Quality Research Centre, Complexo Andaluz, Apartado 279, Santarém 2001-904, Portugal.
Physiol Behav. 2020 Oct 15;225:113118. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113118. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
The aim of the study was to compare training load (TL) of the days preceding a win, draw or defeat in a sample of elite professional soccer players across the in-season 2015/16.
Twenty elite soccer players participated in this study. Total distance covered, high-speed running distance (HSRD), average speed, session rate of perceived exertion (s-RPE) and Hooper index scores (HI) were collected. Data from 24 weeks with one match were analysed through the match-day (MD-5, 4, 3, 2, 1) and MD+1.
The main finding emerges in MD-1, where a longer training duration preceding draws (95.1 ± 1.5 min) > defeats (91.5 ± 1.6 min) > wins (84.7 ± 0.5 min) was found, while total distance and average speed were higher in wins (3628.6 ± 57.2 m) > draws (3391.3 ± 153.3 m) > defeats (3236.1 ± 113.7 m) and draws (130.7 ± 17.6 m/min) > wins (86.0 ± 6.9 m/min) > defeats (54.8 ± 7.1 m/min), respectively. HSRD was higher in draws (42.8 ± 0.6 m) > wins (36.1 ± 1.7 m) > defeats (35.8 ± 1.7 m). In MD+1, there were differences in HI between wins vs draws (p<0.01).
The results are drawn from one team that participated in UEFA Champions League. It was observed that different TL applied in training sessions can influence match result. Our findings can be considered in future soccer planning and periodization to win matches. This study emphasizes the use of HI especially in the day following the match.
本研究旨在比较2015/16赛季精英职业足球运动员样本中,比赛获胜、平局或失利前几天的训练负荷(TL)。
20名精英足球运动员参与了本研究。收集了总跑动距离、高速跑动距离(HSRD)、平均速度、训练主观用力程度评分(s-RPE)和胡珀指数得分(HI)。对24周内每场比赛的数据,通过比赛日(MD-5、4、3、2、1)和比赛日次日(MD+1)进行分析。
主要发现在比赛日的前一天(MD-1),平局前的训练时长(95.1±1.5分钟)>失利前(91.5±1.6分钟)>获胜前(84.7±0.5分钟);而总跑动距离和平均速度方面,获胜场次(3628.6±57.2米)>平局场次(3391.3±153.3米)>失利场次(3236.1±113.7米),平局场次(130.7±17.6米/分钟)>获胜场次(86.0±6.9米/分钟)>失利场次(54.8±7.1米/分钟)。高速跑动距离方面,平局场次(42.8±0.6米)>获胜场次(36.1±1.7米)>失利场次(35.8±1.7米)。在比赛日次日(MD+1),获胜场次和平局场次之间的胡珀指数得分存在差异(p<0.01)。
这些结果来自一支参加欧洲冠军联赛的球队。研究观察到,训练课中采用不同的训练负荷会影响比赛结果。在未来的足球计划和周期安排中,可以参考我们的研究结果以赢得比赛。本研究强调了胡珀指数得分的应用,尤其是在比赛后的第二天。