Department of Smart Information Communication Engineering, Sangmyung University, Cheonan, 330-720, South Korea.
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jan 5;22(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02729-2.
Little is known regarding the role of gender as a possible modulator in determining the associations between lifestyle risk factors and depression in older adults.
This study examined whether gender modulates the relationship between depression and lifestyle risk factors in Korean adults aged 65 years and older (n = 3700).
Data were obtained from the 2016 and 2018 Korea National Health and Examination Survey. The primary outcome was depression, assessed with the patient health questionnaire-9. As exposures, smoking habits, at-risk alcohol consumption, and physical inactivity were assessed with a standardized questionnaire. In addition, mean adequacy ratio (MAR) as an indicator of overall nutritional inadequacy was assessed with dietary intakes of macro- and micronutrients.
In men only, either two or three and more risk factors were significantly associated with higher depression risk (OR (95% confidence interval, CI) = 2.886 (1.003-8.299) and OR (95% CI) = 3.109 (1.064-9.097), respectively). In women only, either two or three and more risk factors were also significantly associated with higher depression risk (OR (95% CI) = 1.505 (1.067-2.124) and OR (95% CI) = 2.828 (1.527-5.239), respectively). In particular, the presence of smoking habits and MAR were the major determinants of depression (OR (95% CI) = 1.835 (1.09-3.10) and OR (95% CI) = 1.585 (1.125-2.233), respectively) in women only. Finally, a moderation analysis with the Hayes PROCESS Macro showed a significant moderating effect of gender (β (95% CI) = 0.633 (0.206 ~ 1.060)) on the relationship between risk factors and depression. In addition, the slope of the relationship was much steeper in women than in men.
Current findings suggest that lifestyle risk factors are more closely associated with depression risk in women than in men.
关于性别是否可能作为一个调节因素,在确定老年人生活方式风险因素与抑郁之间的关系方面,我们知之甚少。
本研究旨在探讨性别是否调节了韩国 65 岁及以上成年人(n=3700)中抑郁与生活方式风险因素之间的关系。
数据来自 2016 年和 2018 年韩国国家健康与体检调查。主要结局是使用患者健康问卷-9 评估的抑郁。作为暴露因素,使用标准化问卷评估吸烟习惯、高危饮酒和身体活动不足。此外,使用宏量和微量营养素的饮食摄入量评估整体营养不足的平均充足率(MAR)作为营养不足的指标。
仅在男性中,两种或三种及以上风险因素与更高的抑郁风险显著相关(比值比(95%置信区间,CI)=2.886(1.003-8.299)和 OR(95% CI)=3.109(1.064-9.097))。仅在女性中,两种或三种及以上风险因素也与更高的抑郁风险显著相关(比值比(95% CI)=1.505(1.067-2.124)和 OR(95% CI)=2.828(1.527-5.239))。特别是,吸烟习惯和 MAR 的存在是女性抑郁的主要决定因素(比值比(95% CI)=1.835(1.09-3.10)和 OR(95% CI)=1.585(1.125-2.233))。最后,使用 Hayes PROCESS Macro 的调节分析显示,性别对风险因素与抑郁之间的关系具有显著的调节作用(β(95% CI)=0.633(0.206~1.060))。此外,女性的关系斜率比男性陡峭得多。
目前的研究结果表明,生活方式风险因素与女性的抑郁风险更为密切相关,而与男性的相关性较低。