• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家对 COVID-19 的韧性与信任相关。

Resilience of countries to COVID-19 correlated with trust.

机构信息

Global Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 6;12(1):75. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03358-w.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-03358-w
PMID:34992222
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8738739/
Abstract

We characterized > 150 countries' resilience to COVID-19 as the nationwide decay rate of daily cases or deaths from peak levels. Resilience to COVID-19 varies by a factor of ~ 40 between countries for cases/capita and ~ 25 for deaths/capita. Trust within society is positively correlated with country-level resilience to COVID-19, as is the adaptive increase in stringency of government interventions when epidemic waves occur. By contrast, countries where governments maintain greater background stringency tend to have lower trust within society and tend to be less resilient. All countries where > 40% agree "most people can be trusted" achieve a near complete reduction of new cases and deaths, but so do several less-trusting societies. As the pandemic progressed, resilience tended to decline, as adaptive increases in stringency also declined. These results add to evidence that trust can improve resilience to epidemics and other unexpected disruptions, of which COVID-19 is unlikely to be the last.

摘要

我们将 150 多个国家对 COVID-19 的弹性定义为每日病例或死亡人数从峰值下降的全国速度。各国的 COVID-19 病例/人均弹性差异约为 40 倍,死亡/人均弹性差异约为 25 倍。社会内部的信任与国家层面的 COVID-19 弹性呈正相关,当疫情波出现时,政府干预措施的适应性增强也是如此。相比之下,政府维持更高背景严格性的国家往往社会内部信任度较低,弹性也较低。所有同意“大多数人可以被信任”的国家比例>40%的国家都实现了新病例和死亡人数的近乎完全减少,但一些信任度较低的社会也是如此。随着大流行的发展,弹性往往会下降,因为严格性的适应性增强也会下降。这些结果进一步证明了信任可以提高对流行病和其他意外破坏的弹性,而 COVID-19 不太可能是最后一次。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c239/8738739/5c98ea5a8d7d/41598_2021_3358_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c239/8738739/8a61982ab917/41598_2021_3358_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c239/8738739/50ffb0fe77ff/41598_2021_3358_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c239/8738739/4a886d30dcc2/41598_2021_3358_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c239/8738739/fb9f86818a69/41598_2021_3358_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c239/8738739/7ba7dbc39287/41598_2021_3358_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c239/8738739/de95de00e6fe/41598_2021_3358_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c239/8738739/5c98ea5a8d7d/41598_2021_3358_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c239/8738739/8a61982ab917/41598_2021_3358_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c239/8738739/50ffb0fe77ff/41598_2021_3358_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c239/8738739/4a886d30dcc2/41598_2021_3358_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c239/8738739/fb9f86818a69/41598_2021_3358_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c239/8738739/7ba7dbc39287/41598_2021_3358_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c239/8738739/de95de00e6fe/41598_2021_3358_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c239/8738739/5c98ea5a8d7d/41598_2021_3358_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Resilience of countries to COVID-19 correlated with trust.国家对 COVID-19 的韧性与信任相关。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 6;12(1):75. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03358-w.
2
Community Resilience and COVID-19: A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Resilience Attributes in 16 Countries.社区韧性与 COVID-19:16 个国家韧性属性的模糊集定性比较分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 28;20(1):474. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010474.
3
Drivers of COVID-19 policy stringency in 175 countries and territories: COVID-19 cases and deaths, gross domestic products per capita, and health expenditures.175 个国家和地区 COVID-19 政策严格程度的驱动因素:COVID-19 病例和死亡人数、人均国内生产总值和卫生支出。
J Glob Health. 2022 Dec 17;12:05049. doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.05049.
4
Evaluation of health system resilience in 60 countries based on their responses to COVID-19.基于各国对 COVID-19 的应对情况评估 60 个国家的卫生系统弹性。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 9;10:1081068. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1081068. eCollection 2022.
5
Promoting societal resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multi-country analysis of public health strategies.促进 COVID-19 大流行期间的社会韧性:对公共卫生策略的多国分析。
Acta Biomed. 2023 Aug 30;94(S3):e2023181. doi: 10.23750/abm.v94iS3.14562.
6
Insights from China: understanding the impact of community resilience and government trust in psychological resilience and anxiety during COVID-19.中国的启示:了解社区韧性和政府信任对 COVID-19 期间心理韧性和焦虑的影响。
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 28;11:1298269. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1298269. eCollection 2023.
7
Face mask use during the COVID-19 pandemic: how risk perception, experience with COVID-19, and attitude towards government interact with country-wide policy stringency.在 COVID-19 大流行期间使用口罩:风险认知、COVID-19 体验和对政府态度如何与全国性政策严格程度相互作用。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Aug 26;22(1):1622. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13632-9.
8
Does High Public Trust Amplify Compliance with Stringent COVID-19 Government Health Guidelines? A Multi-country Analysis Using Data from 102,627 Individuals.公众高度信任是否会增强对严格的新冠疫情政府健康指南的遵守?一项使用来自102,627个人的数据的多国分析。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Jan 26;14:293-302. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S278774. eCollection 2021.
9
Associations between the stringency of COVID-19 containment policies and health service disruptions in 10 countries.10 个国家的 COVID-19 遏制政策严格程度与卫生服务中断之间的关联。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr 12;23(1):363. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09363-1.
10
The relationship between time to a high COVID-19 response level and timing of peak daily incidence: an analysis of governments' Stringency Index from 148 countries.高新冠反应水平时间与每日发病高峰时间之间的关系:对 148 个国家政府的严格指数分析。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2021 Jul 5;10(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s40249-021-00880-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of COVID-19 outcomes with measures of institutional and interpersonal trust: an ecological analysis using national data from 61 countries.新冠疫情结局与机构及人际信任度指标的关联:一项使用61个国家全国数据的生态分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 21;15(1):26393. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09758-6.
2
Meltdown of trust in weakly governed economies.对治理薄弱的经济体信任的瓦解。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Apr 8;122(14):e2320528122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2320528122. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
3
Building public trust in preparation for future health shocks: a research agenda.

本文引用的文献

1
Trust and the Coronavirus Pandemic: What are the Consequences of and for Trust? An Early Review of the Literature.信任与新冠疫情:信任的后果及对信任而言的后果是什么?文献的早期综述
Polit Stud Rev. 2021 May;19(2):274-285. doi: 10.1177/1478929920948684.
2
Kumbh Mela Religious Gathering as a Massive Superspreading Event: Potential Culprit for the Exponential Surge of COVID-19 Cases in India.印度大规模集会可能是新冠病例激增的罪魁祸首。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021 Aug 30;105(4):868-871. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-0601.
3
COVID-19 and mucormycosis syndemic: double health threat to a collapsing healthcare system in India.
构建公众信任,为未来的健康冲击做好准备:研究议程。
BMJ. 2024 Oct 7;387:e078464. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-078464.
4
A novel, scenario-based approach to comparing non-pharmaceutical intervention strategies across nations.一种新颖的基于情景的方法,用于比较各国的非药物干预策略。
J R Soc Interface. 2024 Sep;21(218):20240301. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0301. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
5
Placing Trust at the Heart of Health Policy and Systems.将信任置于卫生政策和体系的核心。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13:8410. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2024.8410. Epub 2024 May 7.
6
Evidence of health system resilience in primary health care for preventing under-five mortality in Rwanda and Bangladesh: Lessons from an implementation study during the Millennium Development Goal period and the early period of COVID-19.卢旺达和孟加拉国初级卫生保健中卫生系统弹性的证据:在千年发展目标期间和 COVID-19 早期实施研究中的经验教训。
J Glob Health. 2024 Jul 5;14:05023. doi: 10.7189/jogh.14.05023.
7
Country-specific determinants for COVID-19 case fatality rate and response strategies from a global perspective: an interpretable machine learning framework.从全球视角看 COVID-19 病死率的国家特有决定因素和应对策略:一个可解释的机器学习框架。
Popul Health Metr. 2024 Jun 3;22(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12963-024-00330-4.
8
Paving the Way for the Next Frontier of Community-Engaged Research.为社区参与研究的下一个前沿领域铺平道路。
Am J Public Health. 2024 May;114(S5):S347-S349. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307685.
9
Autonomous and policy-induced behavior change during the COVID-19 pandemic: Towards understanding and modeling the interplay of behavioral adaptation.自主行为改变和政策干预下的 COVID-19 大流行期间行为改变:理解和建模行为适应的相互作用。
PLoS One. 2024 May 2;19(5):e0296145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296145. eCollection 2024.
10
Principles to guide research and policy on psychological well-being in remote island developing states in the South Pacific.指导南太平洋偏远岛屿发展中国家心理健康研究与政策的原则。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 20;15:1325292. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1325292. eCollection 2024.
COVID-19 和毛霉菌病综合征:印度崩溃的医疗体系面临的双重健康威胁。
Trop Med Int Health. 2021 Sep;26(9):1016-1018. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13641. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
4
Myanmar's coup d'état and its impact on COVID-19 response: a collapsing healthcare system in a state of turmoil.缅甸政变及其对新冠疫情应对的影响:动荡局势下濒临崩溃的医疗体系。
BMJ Mil Health. 2023 Apr;169(2):103-104. doi: 10.1136/bmjmilitary-2021-001871. Epub 2021 May 21.
5
Employing medical anthropology approach as an additional public health strategy in promoting COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in Bhutan.采用医学人类学方法作为促进不丹 COVID-19 疫苗接种的额外公共卫生策略。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2021 Sep;36(5):1943-1946. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3191. Epub 2021 May 12.
6
Typhoons During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Philippines: Impact of a Double Crises on Mental Health.菲律宾新冠疫情期间的台风:双重危机对心理健康的影响
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2021 May 3:1-4. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2021.140.
7
Trust in government regarding COVID-19 and its associations with preventive health behaviour and prosocial behaviour during the pandemic: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study.民众对政府在 COVID-19 方面的信任及其与大流行期间预防保健行为和亲社会行为的关系:一项横断面和纵向研究。
Psychol Med. 2023 Jan;53(1):149-159. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721001306. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
8
The temporal association of introducing and lifting non-pharmaceutical interventions with the time-varying reproduction number (R) of SARS-CoV-2: a modelling study across 131 countries.引入和取消非药物干预措施与 SARS-CoV-2 时变繁殖数(R)之间的时间关联:131 个国家的建模研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;21(2):193-202. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30785-4. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
9
Trust predicts COVID-19 prescribed and discretionary behavioral intentions in 23 countries.信任预测了 23 个国家的 COVID-19 规定和自由裁量性行为意向。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 10;16(3):e0248334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248334. eCollection 2021.
10
Experiences matter: A longitudinal study of individual-level sources of declining social trust in the United States.经验很重要:一项关于美国社会信任度下降的个体层面根源的纵向研究。
Soc Sci Res. 2021 Mar;95:102537. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2021.102537. Epub 2021 Feb 9.