Mastri Michalis, Ramakrishnan Swathi, Shah Shruti D, Karasik Ellen, Gillard Bryan M, Moser Michael T, Farmer Bailey K, Azabdaftari Gissou, Chatta Gurkamal S, Woloszynska Anna, Eng Kevin H, Foster Barbara A, Huss Wendy J
Department of Cancer Genetics and Genomics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center Buffalo 14263, NY, USA.
Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center Buffalo 14263, NY, USA.
Am J Clin Exp Urol. 2021 Dec 15;9(6):416-434. eCollection 2021.
The evolving paradigm of the molecular classification of bladder cancer requires models that represent the classifications with less heterogeneity. Robust transcriptome based molecular classifications are essential to address tumor heterogeneity. Patient derived models (PDMs) are a powerful preclinical tool to study specific tumor compartments. We tested if the consensus molecular subtype analysis was applicable to PDMs and evaluated the tumor compartment each model represents. PDMs derived from surgical specimens were established as xenografts (PDX), organoids (PDO), and spheroids (PDS). The surgical specimens and PDMs were molecularly characterized by RNA sequencing. PDMs that were established in immune deficient mice or significantly downregulated transcripts related to the immune and stromal compartments compared to the surgical specimens. However, PDMs upregulate a patient-specific bladder cancer cell signal which allowed for analysis of cancer cell pathways independent of the tumor microenvironment. Based on transcriptomic signatures, PDMs are more similar to their surgical specimen than the model type; indicating that the PDMs retained unique features of the tumor from which the PDM was derived. When comparing models, PDX models were the most similar to the surgical specimen, while PDO and PDS models were most similar to each other. When the consensus molecular subtype classification system was applied to both the surgical samples and the three PDMs, good concordance was found between all samples indicating that this system of classification can be applied to PDO and PDS models. PDMs reduce tumor heterogeneity and allow analysis of tumor cells while maintaining the gene expression profile representative of the original tumor.
膀胱癌分子分类的不断演变的范式需要能够以较少异质性来表示分类的模型。基于转录组的强大分子分类对于解决肿瘤异质性至关重要。患者来源的模型(PDM)是研究特定肿瘤区室的强大临床前工具。我们测试了共识分子亚型分析是否适用于PDM,并评估了每个模型所代表的肿瘤区室。从手术标本衍生的PDM被建立为异种移植(PDX)、类器官(PDO)和球体(PDS)。手术标本和PDM通过RNA测序进行分子特征分析。与手术标本相比,在免疫缺陷小鼠中建立的PDM或与免疫和基质区室相关的转录本显著下调。然而,PDM上调了患者特异性的膀胱癌细胞信号,从而能够独立于肿瘤微环境分析癌细胞途径。基于转录组特征,PDM与其手术标本比与模型类型更相似;这表明PDM保留了其来源肿瘤的独特特征。在比较模型时,PDX模型与手术标本最相似,而PDO和PDS模型彼此最相似。当将共识分子亚型分类系统应用于手术样本和三种PDM时,所有样本之间发现了良好的一致性,表明这种分类系统可以应用于PDO和PDS模型。PDM减少了肿瘤异质性,并允许在保持代表原始肿瘤的基因表达谱的同时分析肿瘤细胞。