Brandl Caroline, Zimmermann Martina E, Günther Felix, Dietl Alexander, Küchenhoff Helmut, Loss Julika, Stark Klaus J, Heid Iris M
Department of Genetic Epidemiology, University of Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Alle 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jan 8;22(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02677-x.
Containment measures in the COVID-19 pandemic protected individuals at high risk, particularly individuals at old age, but little is known about how these measures affected health-related behavior of old aged individuals. We aimed to investigate the impact of the spring 2020 lockdown in Germany on healthcare-seeking and health-related lifestyle in the old aged and to identify susceptible subgroups.
We conducted a follow-up survey among the pre-pandemically well-characterized participants of our AugUR cohort study, residents in/around Regensburg aged 70+ years and relatively mobile. A self-completion questionnaire on current behavior, perceived changes, and SARS-Cov-2 infection was mailed in May 2020, shortly before contact restrictions ended. Pre-pandemic lifestyle and medical conditions were derived from previous study center visits.
Among 1850 survey participants (73-98 years; net-response 89%), 74% were at increased risk for severe COVID-19 according to medical conditions; four participants reported SARS-CoV-2 infection (0.2%). Participants reported changes in behavior: 29% refrained from medical appointments, 14% increased TV consumption, 26% reported less physical activity, but no systematic increase of smoking or alcohol consumption. When comparing during- and pre-lockdown reports of lifestyle within participant, we found the same pattern as for the reported perceived changes. Women and the more educated were more susceptible to changes. Worse QOL was perceived by 38%.
Our data suggest that the spring 2020 lockdown did not affect the lifestyle of a majority of the mobile old aged individuals, but the substantial proportions with decreased physical activity and healthcare-seeking are markers of collateral damage.
2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的防控措施保护了高危人群,尤其是老年人,但对于这些措施如何影响老年人与健康相关的行为,人们知之甚少。我们旨在调查2020年春季德国封锁措施对老年人就医行为和与健康相关生活方式的影响,并确定易感亚组。
我们对奥古尔队列研究中疫情前特征明确的参与者进行了随访调查,这些参与者是雷根斯堡及其周边地区70岁及以上且行动相对自如的居民。2020年5月,在接触限制结束前不久,我们邮寄了一份关于当前行为、感知变化和严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2感染情况的自填问卷。疫情前的生活方式和医疗状况来自之前的研究中心访视。
在1850名调查参与者(73 - 98岁;净回复率89%)中,根据医疗状况,74%的人患重症2019冠状病毒病的风险增加;4名参与者报告感染了严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(0.2%)。参与者报告了行为变化:29%的人避免就医预约,14%的人增加了看电视的时间,26%的人报告身体活动减少,但吸烟或饮酒没有系统性增加。在比较参与者封锁期间和封锁前的生活方式报告时,我们发现了与报告的感知变化相同的模式。女性和受教育程度较高者更容易受到影响。38%的人感觉生活质量变差。
我们的数据表明,2020年春季的封锁措施并未影响大多数行动自如的老年人的生活方式,但相当一部分人身体活动减少和就医行为受影响是附带损害的标志。