• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消极偏见对自由主义者和保守主义者来说是直观的吗?

Is negativity bias intuitive for liberals and conservatives?

作者信息

Salter Metin Ege, Duymaç Firat Yavuz, Yilmaz Onurcan, Bahçekapili Hasan G, Harma Mehmet

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Kadir Has University, Cibali, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey.

Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Curr Psychol. 2022 Jan 3:1-13. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-02557-y.

DOI:10.1007/s12144-021-02557-y
PMID:35002183
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8720537/
Abstract

Previous research suggests that conservatives (right-wingers) tend to show more negativity bias than liberals (left-wingers) in several tasks. However, the majority of these studies are based on correlational findings and do not provide information on the cognitive underpinnings of this tendency. The current research investigated whether intuition promotes negativity bias and mitigates the ideological asymmetry in this domain in three underrepresented, non-western samples (Turkey). In line with the previous literature, we defined negativity bias as the tendency to interpret ambiguous faces as threatening. The results of the lab experiment revealed that negativity bias increases under high-cognitive load overall. In addition, this effect was moderated by the participants' political orientation (Experiment 1). In other words, when their cognitive resources were depleted, liberals became more like conservatives in terms of negativity bias. However, we failed to conceptually replicate this effect using time-limit manipulations in two online preregistered experiments during the COVID-19 pandemic, where the baseline negativity bias is thought to be already at peak. Thus, the findings provide no strong evidence for the idea that intuition promotes negativity bias and that liberals use cognitive effort to avoid this perceptual bias.

摘要

先前的研究表明,在多项任务中,保守派(右翼人士)往往比自由派(左翼人士)表现出更多的消极偏见。然而,这些研究大多基于相关性发现,并未提供关于这种倾向的认知基础的信息。当前的研究调查了直觉是否会促进消极偏见,并在三个代表性不足的非西方样本(土耳其)中减轻这一领域的意识形态不对称。与先前的文献一致,我们将消极偏见定义为将模棱两可的面孔解读为具有威胁性的倾向。实验室实验的结果表明,总体而言,在高认知负荷下消极偏见会增加。此外,这种效应受到参与者政治倾向的调节(实验1)。换句话说,当他们的认知资源被耗尽时,自由派在消极偏见方面变得更像保守派。然而,在新冠疫情期间的两项在线预注册实验中,我们未能通过限时操作从概念上重现这种效应,在这些实验中,基线消极偏见被认为已经处于峰值。因此,这些发现没有为直觉促进消极偏见以及自由派利用认知努力来避免这种感知偏见这一观点提供有力证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c10b/8720537/423b677deac5/12144_2021_2557_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c10b/8720537/e4398898800c/12144_2021_2557_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c10b/8720537/be948f984509/12144_2021_2557_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c10b/8720537/423b677deac5/12144_2021_2557_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c10b/8720537/e4398898800c/12144_2021_2557_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c10b/8720537/be948f984509/12144_2021_2557_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c10b/8720537/423b677deac5/12144_2021_2557_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Is negativity bias intuitive for liberals and conservatives?消极偏见对自由主义者和保守主义者来说是直观的吗?
Curr Psychol. 2022 Jan 3:1-13. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-02557-y.
2
At Least Bias Is Bipartisan: A Meta-Analytic Comparison of Partisan Bias in Liberals and Conservatives.至少偏见是两党都有的:对自由派和保守派党派偏见的元分析比较。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019 Mar;14(2):273-291. doi: 10.1177/1745691617746796. Epub 2018 May 31.
3
The politics of gaydar: ideological differences in the use of gendered cues in categorizing sexual orientation.性取向直觉的政治:在使用性别线索对性取向进行分类时的意识形态差异。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Mar;104(3):520-41. doi: 10.1037/a0031187. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
4
Liberals and conservatives can show similarities in negativity bias.自由派和保守派在消极偏见方面可能存在相似之处。
Behav Brain Sci. 2014 Jun;37(3):307-8. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X13002513.
5
Of deadly beans and risky stocks: Political ideology and attitude formation via exploration depend on the nature of the attitude stimuli.致命的豆子和危险的股票:通过探索形成的政治意识形态和态度取决于态度刺激的性质。
Br J Psychol. 2021 Feb;112(1):342-357. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12430. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
6
False Equivalence: Are Liberals and Conservatives in the United States Equally Biased?错误的等同:美国的自由派和保守派是否同样存在偏见?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019 Mar;14(2):292-303. doi: 10.1177/1745691618788876.
7
Conservatism and liberalism predict performance in two nonideological cognitive tasks.保守主义和自由主义在两项非意识形态的认知任务中预示着表现。
Politics Life Sci. 2017 Fall;36(2):49-59. doi: 10.1017/pls.2017.17.
8
The moral stereotypes of liberals and conservatives: exaggeration of differences across the political spectrum.自由派和保守派的道德刻板印象:政治光谱上差异的夸大。
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e50092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050092. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
9
The hand in motion of liberals and conservatives reveals the differential processing of positive and negative information.自由派和保守派在手部动作上的差异揭示了对正面和负面信息的不同处理方式。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2016 Jul;168:78-84. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 May 6.
10
Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology.消极偏见的差异是政治意识形态变化的基础。
Behav Brain Sci. 2014 Jun;37(3):297-307. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X13001192.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of trait reappraisal in response to emotional ambiguity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.特质重评在应对情绪模糊性中的作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Emotion. 2024 Jun;24(4):935-946. doi: 10.1037/emo0001316. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
2
Think again: the role of reappraisal in reducing negative valence bias.重新思考:重新评价在减少负面效价偏差中的作用。
Cogn Emot. 2023 Mar;37(2):238-253. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2022.2160698. Epub 2022 Dec 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Conservatives and liberals have similar physiological responses to threats.保守派和自由派在面对威胁时有着相似的生理反应。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Jun;4(6):613-621. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0823-z. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
2
Preregistration Is Hard, And Worthwhile.预先注册很难,但很有价值。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Oct;23(10):815-818. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.07.009. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
3
Meta-ethics and the mortality: Mortality salience leads people to adopt a less subjectivist morality.元伦理学与死亡:死亡凸显会导致人们采取不那么主观主义的道德观。
Cognition. 2018 Oct;179:171-177. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.014. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
4
The preregistration revolution.预注册革命。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 13;115(11):2600-2606. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708274114.
5
Conservatism and the neural circuitry of threat: economic conservatism predicts greater amygdala-BNST connectivity during periods of threat vs safety.保守主义与威胁的神经回路:在威胁与安全时期,经济保守主义预测杏仁核-BNST 连接更强。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2018 Jan 1;13(1):43-51. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx133.
6
Activating analytic thinking enhances the value given to individualizing moral foundations.激活分析性思维会提高赋予道德基础个体化的价值。
Cognition. 2017 Aug;165:88-96. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.009. Epub 2017 May 17.
7
Social and economic ideologies differentially predict prejudice across the political spectrum, but social issues are most divisive.社会和经济意识形态在整个政治光谱中对偏见的预测存在差异,但社会问题最具分裂性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Mar;112(3):383-412. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000074.
8
The extent and consequences of p-hacking in science.科学中的 p-值操纵的程度和后果。
PLoS Biol. 2015 Mar 13;13(3):e1002106. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002106. eCollection 2015 Mar.
9
Liberals think more analytically (more "WEIRD") than conservatives.自由主义者比保守主义者更善于进行分析性思考(更具“西方、受过良好教育、工业化、富有、民主”的特点)。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Feb;41(2):250-67. doi: 10.1177/0146167214563672. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
10
Liberals and conservatives can show similarities in negativity bias.自由派和保守派在消极偏见方面可能存在相似之处。
Behav Brain Sci. 2014 Jun;37(3):307-8. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X13002513.