Zhang Yongxia, Liu Fengjie, Zhang Han, Ma Heng, Sun Jian, Zhang Ran, Song Lei, Shi Hao
Department of Medical Imaging, Shandong Qianfoshan Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Department of Radiology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yantai, China.
Front Oncol. 2021 Dec 23;11:773196. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.773196. eCollection 2021.
To evaluate the value of radiomics analysis in contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) for the identification of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).
CESM images of 367 pathologically confirmed breast cancer patients (training set: 218, testing set: 149) were retrospectively analyzed. Cranial caudal (CC), mediolateral oblique (MLO), and combined models were built on the basis of the features extracted from subtracted images on CC, MLO, and the combination of CC and MLO, respectively, in the tumour region. The performance of the models was evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and decision curve analysis (DCA). The areas under ROC curves (AUCs) were compared through the DeLong test.
The combined CC and MLO model had the best AUC and sensitivity of 0.90 (95% confidence interval: 0.85-0.96) and 0.97, respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test yielded a non-significant statistic with of 0.59. The clinical usefulness of the combined CC and MLO model was confirmed if the threshold was between 0.02 and 0.81 in the DCA.
Machine learning models based on subtracted images in CESM images were valuable for distinguishing TNBC and NTNBC. The model with the combined CC and MLO features had the best performance compared with models that used CC or MLO features alone.
评估乳腺对比增强光谱钼靶成像(CESM)中的影像组学分析在鉴别三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)方面的价值。
回顾性分析367例经病理证实的乳腺癌患者的CESM图像(训练集:218例,测试集:149例)。分别基于从肿瘤区域的头尾位(CC)、内外斜位(MLO)以及CC与MLO联合的减影图像中提取的特征,构建CC、MLO及联合模型。通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析、Hosmer-Lemeshow检验和决策曲线分析(DCA)对模型性能进行评估。通过DeLong检验比较ROC曲线下面积(AUC)。
CC与MLO联合模型的AUC和灵敏度最佳,分别为0.90(95%置信区间:0.85 - 0.96)和0.97。Hosmer-Lemeshow检验得出的统计量无显著性,为0.59。在DCA中,若阈值在0.02至0.81之间,则证实CC与MLO联合模型具有临床实用性。
基于CESM图像减影的机器学习模型对鉴别TNBC和非TNBC具有重要价值。与单独使用CC或MLO特征的模型相比,具有CC和MLO联合特征的模型性能最佳。