Herbert Cornelia, Marschin Verena, Erb Benjamin, Meißner Dominik, Aufheimer Maria, Bösch Christoph
Department of Applied Emotion and Motivation Psychology, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Institute of Distributed Systems, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Front Big Data. 2021 Dec 24;4:763196. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2021.763196. eCollection 2021.
Digital interactions via the internet have become the norm rather than the exception in our global society. Concerns have been raised about human-centered privacy and the often unreflected self-disclosure behavior of internet users. This study on human-centered privacy follows two major aims: first, investigate the willingness of university students (as digital natives) to disclose private data and information about their person, social and academic life, their mental health as well as their health behavior habits, when taking part as a volunteer in a scientific online survey. Second, examine to what extent the participants' self-disclosure behavior can be modulated by experimental induction of privacy awareness (PA) or trust in privacy (TIP) or a combination of both (PA and TIP). In addition, the role of human factors such as personality traits, gender or mental health (e.g., self-reported depressive symptoms) on self-disclosure behavior was explored. Participants were randomly assigned to four experimental groups. In group A ( = 50, 7 males), privacy awareness (PA) was induced implicitly by the inclusion of privacy concern items. In group B ( = 43, 6 males), trust in privacy (TIP) was experimentally induced by buzzwords and by visual TIP primes promising safe data storage. Group C ( = 79, 12 males) received both, PA and TIP induction, while group D ( = 55, 9 males) served as control group. Participants had the choice to answer the survey items by agreeing to one of a number of possible answers including the options to refrain from self-disclosure by choosing the response options "don't know" or "no answer." Self-disclosure among participants was high irrespective of experimental group and irrespective of psychological domains of the information provided. The results of this study suggest that willingness of volunteers to self-disclose private data in a scientific online study cannot simply be overruled or changed by any of the chosen experimental privacy manipulations. The present results extend the previous literature on human-centered privacy and despite limitations can give important insights into self-disclosure behavior of young people and the privacy paradox.
在我们的全球社会中,通过互联网进行的数字互动已成为常态而非例外。人们对以人为主的隐私以及互联网用户常常未经思考的自我披露行为表示担忧。这项关于以人为主的隐私的研究有两个主要目标:第一,调查大学生(作为数字原生代)在作为志愿者参与科学在线调查时,披露有关他们个人、社交和学术生活、心理健康以及健康行为习惯的私人数据和信息的意愿。第二,研究参与者的自我披露行为在多大程度上可以通过隐私意识(PA)或对隐私的信任(TIP)的实验诱导或两者结合(PA和TIP)来调节。此外,还探讨了人格特质、性别或心理健康(如自我报告的抑郁症状)等人为因素对自我披露行为的作用。参与者被随机分配到四个实验组。在A组(n = 50,7名男性)中,通过纳入隐私关注项目来隐性诱导隐私意识(PA)。在B组(n = 43,6名男性)中,通过流行语和承诺安全数据存储的视觉TIP启动因素来实验性诱导对隐私的信任(TIP)。C组(n = 79,12名男性)同时接受PA和TIP诱导,而D组(n = 55,9名男性)作为对照组。参与者可以选择通过同意一系列可能答案中的一个来回答调查项目,包括通过选择“不知道”或“无答案”选项来避免自我披露的选项。无论实验组如何,也无论所提供信息的心理领域如何,参与者之间的自我披露程度都很高。这项研究的结果表明,在科学在线研究中,志愿者自我披露私人数据的意愿不能简单地被任何选定的实验性隐私操纵所否决或改变。目前的结果扩展了先前关于以人为主的隐私的文献,尽管存在局限性,但可以为年轻人的自我披露行为和隐私悖论提供重要见解。