Suppr超能文献

残留氧化铝对喷砂钛牙种植体的益处:骨整合及杀菌作用

Benefits of Residual Aluminum Oxide for Sand Blasting Titanium Dental Implants: Osseointegration and Bactericidal Effects.

作者信息

Gil Javier, Pérez Román, Herrero-Climent Mariano, Rizo-Gorrita Maria, Torres-Lagares Daniel, Gutierrez Jose Luis

机构信息

Bioengineering Institute of Technology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, International University of Cataluña, c. Josep Trueta s/n. Sant Cugat del Valles, 08125 Barcelona, Spain.

Faculty of Denstistry, International University of Cataluña, c. Josep Trueta s/n. Sant Cugat del Valles, 08125 Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2021 Dec 27;15(1):178. doi: 10.3390/ma15010178.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this work was to determine the influence of residual alumina after sand blasting treatment in titanium dental implants. This paper studied the effect of alumina on physico-chemical surface properties, such as: surface wettability, surface energy. Osseointegration and bacteria adhesion were determined in order to determine the effect of the abrasive particles.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three surfaces were studied: (1) as-received, (2) rough surface with residual alumina from sand blasting on the surface and (3) with the same roughness but without residual alumina. Roughness was determined by white light interferometer microscopy. Surface wettability was evaluated with a contact angle video-based system and the surface free energy by means of Owens and Wendt equation. Scanning electron microscopy equipped with microanalysis was used to study the morphology and determine the chemical composition of the surfaces. Bacteria (Lactobacillus salivarius and Streptococcus sanguinis) were cultured in each surface. In total, 110 dental implants were placed into the bone of eight minipigs in order to compare the osseointegration. The percentage of bone-to-implant contact was determined after 4 and 6 weeks of implantation with histometric analysis.

RESULTS

The surfaces with residual alumina presented a lower surface free energy than clean surfaces. The in vivo studies demonstrated that the residual alumina accelerated bone tissue growth at different implantation times, in relation to clean dental implants. In addition, residual alumina showed a bactericidal effect by decreasing the quantity of bacteria adhering to the titanium.

CONCLUSIONS

It is possible to verify the benefits that the alumina (percentages around 8% in weight) produces on the surface of titanium dental implants.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Clinicians should be aware of the benefits of sand-blasted alumina due to the physico-chemical surface changes demonstrated in in vivo tests.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定喷砂处理后残留氧化铝对牙科钛种植体的影响。本文研究了氧化铝对物理化学表面性质的影响,如表面润湿性、表面能。通过测定骨结合和细菌黏附情况来确定磨料颗粒的作用。

材料与方法

研究了三种表面:(1)原始表面;(2)表面有喷砂处理后残留氧化铝的粗糙表面;(3)粗糙度相同但无残留氧化铝的表面。通过白光干涉显微镜测定粗糙度。使用基于接触角视频的系统评估表面润湿性,并通过欧文斯和温特方程计算表面自由能。利用配备微分析功能的扫描电子显微镜研究表面形态并确定化学成分。在每个表面培养细菌(唾液乳杆菌和血链球菌)。总共将110颗牙科种植体植入八只小型猪的骨内,以比较骨结合情况。植入4周和6周后,通过组织计量分析确定骨与种植体接触的百分比。

结果

有残留氧化铝的表面比清洁表面具有更低的表面自由能。体内研究表明,与清洁的牙科种植体相比,残留氧化铝在不同植入时间加速了骨组织生长。此外,残留氧化铝通过减少黏附在钛上的细菌数量显示出杀菌作用。

结论

可以证实氧化铝(重量百分比约为8%)对牙科钛种植体表面产生的益处。

临床意义

临床医生应了解喷砂氧化铝的益处,因为体内试验证明了其物理化学表面变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f84a/8746027/dce2c52466f8/materials-15-00178-g001.jpg

相似文献

2
Osteoblastic cell behaviour on modified titanium surfaces.
Micron. 2018 Feb;105:55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2017.11.010. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
3
Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Nov;19(11):1103-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01547.x.
4
Characterization of five different implant surfaces and their effect on osseointegration: a study in dogs.
J Periodontol. 2011 May;82(5):742-50. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100520. Epub 2010 Nov 8.
5
Positive Biomechanical Effects of Titanium Oxide for Sandblasting Implant Surface as an Alternative to Aluminium Oxide.
J Oral Implantol. 2015 Oct;41(5):515-22. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-13-00019. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
6
7
Effectiveness of a new dental implant bioactive surface: histological and histomorphometric comparative study in minipigs.
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Apr;22(3):1423-1432. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2223-y. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
8
Influence of acid-etching after grit-blasted on osseointegration of titanium dental implants: in vitro and in vivo studies.
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2013 Aug;24(8):2047-55. doi: 10.1007/s10856-013-4935-0. Epub 2013 Apr 27.
9
Importance of the Roughness and Residual Stresses of Dental Implants on Fatigue and Osseointegration Behavior. In Vivo Study in Rabbits.
J Oral Implantol. 2016 Dec;42(6):469-476. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00088. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
10
Influence of Titanium Surface Residual Stresses on Osteoblastic Response and Bacteria Colonization.
Materials (Basel). 2024 Apr 2;17(7):1626. doi: 10.3390/ma17071626.

引用本文的文献

1
Critical Questions Surrounding the Shot-Blasting Treatment of Titanium Dental Implants.
Materials (Basel). 2025 Sep 2;18(17):4120. doi: 10.3390/ma18174120.
2
Tuning Titanium Surface Properties via μPPEO for Improved Osseointegration and Cell Adhesion.
Materials (Basel). 2025 Aug 13;18(16):3792. doi: 10.3390/ma18163792.
4
Topography-based implants for bone regeneration: Design, biological mechanism, and therapeutics.
Mater Today Bio. 2025 Jul 13;34:102066. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.102066. eCollection 2025 Oct.
5
The Topography of Titanium in Dental Implants: Key to Osseointegration and Bactericidal Capacity.
Materials (Basel). 2025 Jul 17;18(14):3368. doi: 10.3390/ma18143368.
6
Controlling Cellular Behavior by Surface Design of Titanium-based Biomaterials.
In Vivo. 2025 May-Jun;39(3):1786-1798. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13980.
7
Applications and interventions of polymers and nanomaterials in alveolar bone regeneration and tooth dentistry.
RSC Adv. 2024 Nov 12;14(49):36226-36245. doi: 10.1039/d4ra06092j. eCollection 2024 Nov 11.
9
Antibacterial and osteogenic thin films on Ti-6Al-4V surface formed by passivation process in copper hydroxide solution.
Sci Technol Adv Mater. 2024 Jan 10;25(1):2303327. doi: 10.1080/14686996.2024.2303327. eCollection 2024.
10
Construction of functional surfaces for dental implants to enhance osseointegration.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Nov 14;11:1320307. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1320307. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

2
Physical characterization of 3 implant systems made of distinct materials with distinct surfaces.
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Jul;128(1):63-72. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.11.015. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
4
Comparison between Sandblasted Acid-Etched and Oxidized Titanium Dental Implants: In Vivo Study.
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Jul 3;20(13):3267. doi: 10.3390/ijms20133267.
5
Cytocompatible and Anti-bacterial Adhesion Nanotextured Titanium Oxide Layer on Titanium Surfaces for Dental and Orthopedic Implants.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019 May 9;7:103. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00103. eCollection 2019.
7
Dental implant surfaces after insertion in bone: an in vitro study in four commercial implant systems.
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Apr;22(3):1593-1600. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2262-4. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
8
Understanding biomaterial-tissue interface quality: combined evaluation.
Sci Technol Adv Mater. 2017 Jul 31;18(1):550-562. doi: 10.1080/14686996.2017.1348872. eCollection 2017.
9
The influence of surface texture and wettability on initial bacterial adhesion on titanium and zirconium oxide dental implants.
Int J Implant Dent. 2017 Dec;3(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40729-017-0093-3. Epub 2017 Jul 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验