Precision Health, Department of Bioengineering, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan.
Department of Economics and Finance, Catholic University of Milan, 20123 Milan, Italy.
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Dec 22;22(1):34. doi: 10.3390/s22010034.
Physiological time series are affected by many factors, making them highly nonlinear and nonstationary. As a consequence, heart rate time series are often considered difficult to predict and handle. However, heart rate behavior can indicate underlying cardiovascular and respiratory diseases as well as mood disorders. Given the importance of accurate modeling and reliable predictions of heart rate fluctuations for the prevention and control of certain diseases, it is paramount to identify models with the best performance in such tasks. The objectives of this study were to compare the results of three different forecasting models (Autoregressive Model, Long Short-Term Memory Network, and Convolutional Long Short-Term Memory Network) trained and tested on heart rate beats per minute data obtained from twelve heterogeneous participants and to identify the architecture with the best performance in terms of modeling and forecasting heart rate behavior. Heart rate beats per minute data were collected using a wearable device over a period of 10 days from twelve different participants who were heterogeneous in age, sex, medical history, and lifestyle behaviors. The goodness of the results produced by the models was measured using both the mean absolute error and the root mean square error as error metrics. Despite the three models showing similar performance, the Autoregressive Model gave the best results in all settings examined. For example, considering one of the participants, the Autoregressive Model gave a mean absolute error of 2.069 (compared to 2.173 of the Long Short-Term Memory Network and 2.138 of the Convolutional Long Short-Term Memory Network), achieving an improvement of 5.027% and 3.335%, respectively. Similar results can be observed for the other participants. The findings of the study suggest that regardless of an individual's age, sex, and lifestyle behaviors, their heart rate largely depends on the pattern observed in the previous few minutes, suggesting that heart rate can be reasonably regarded as an autoregressive process. The findings also suggest that minute-by-minute heart rate prediction can be accurately performed using a linear model, at least in individuals without pathologies that cause heartbeat irregularities. The findings also suggest many possible applications for the Autoregressive Model, in principle in any context where minute-by-minute heart rate prediction is required (arrhythmia detection and analysis of the response to training, among others).
生理时间序列受到许多因素的影响,因此具有高度的非线性和非平稳性。因此,心率时间序列通常被认为难以预测和处理。然而,心率行为可以指示潜在的心血管和呼吸系统疾病以及情绪障碍。鉴于准确建模和可靠预测心率波动对于预防和控制某些疾病的重要性,确定在这些任务中表现最佳的模型至关重要。本研究的目的是比较三种不同预测模型(自回归模型、长短期记忆网络和卷积长短期记忆网络)在从 12 名异质参与者获得的每分钟心率节拍数据上进行训练和测试的结果,并确定在建模和预测心率行为方面表现最佳的架构。使用可穿戴设备在 10 天内从 12 名年龄、性别、病史和生活方式行为各异的不同参与者身上收集每分钟心率节拍数据。使用平均绝对误差和均方根误差作为误差度量来衡量模型产生的结果的好坏。尽管这三个模型表现出相似的性能,但自回归模型在所有检查的设置中都给出了最佳的结果。例如,考虑其中一个参与者,自回归模型的平均绝对误差为 2.069(相比之下,长短期记忆网络为 2.173,卷积长短期记忆网络为 2.138),分别实现了 5.027%和 3.335%的改进。对于其他参与者也可以观察到类似的结果。该研究的结果表明,无论个人的年龄、性别和生活方式行为如何,他们的心率在很大程度上取决于前几分钟观察到的模式,这表明心率可以合理地视为自回归过程。研究结果还表明,可以使用线性模型准确地进行每分钟的心率预测,至少在没有导致心跳不规则的病理的个体中是如此。研究结果还表明,自回归模型有许多可能的应用,原则上在需要每分钟心率预测的任何情况下都可以应用(例如心律失常检测和训练反应分析等)。