Occupational Health Equity Program, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 1090 Tusculum Ave., Cincinnati, OH 45226, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 29;19(1):349. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010349.
Despite significant improvements in occupational safety and health (OSH) over the past 50 years, there remain persistent inequities in the burden of injuries and illnesses. In this commentary, the authors assert that addressing these inequities, along with challenges associated with the fundamental reorganization of work, will require a more holistic approach that accounts for the social contexts within which occupational injuries and illnesses occur. A biopsychosocial approach explores the dynamic, multidirectional interactions between biological phenomena, psychological factors, and social contexts, and can be a tool for both deeper understanding of the social determinants of health and advancing health equity. This commentary suggests that reducing inequities will require OSH to adopt the biopsychosocial paradigm. Practices in at least three key areas will need to adopt this shift. Research that explicitly examines occupational health inequities should do more to elucidate the effects of social arrangements and the interaction of work with other social determinants on work-related risks, exposures, and outcomes. OSH studies regardless of focus should incorporate inclusive methods for recruitment, data collection, and analysis to reflect societal diversity and account for differing experiences of social conditions. OSH researchers should work across disciplines to integrate work into the broader health equity research agenda.
尽管在过去的 50 年中,职业安全与健康(OSH)有了显著的改善,但在受伤和患病的负担方面仍存在持续的不平等现象。在这篇评论中,作者断言,要解决这些不平等问题以及与工作的基本重组相关的挑战,需要采取更全面的方法,考虑到职业伤害和疾病发生的社会背景。生物心理社会方法探讨了生物现象、心理因素和社会背景之间的动态、多向相互作用,它可以作为一种工具,用于深入了解健康的社会决定因素,并促进健康公平。本评论认为,减少不平等现象需要 OSH 采用生物心理社会范式。至少有三个关键领域的实践需要进行这种转变。明确研究职业健康不平等的研究应该更多地阐明社会安排的影响以及工作与其他社会决定因素的相互作用对与工作相关的风险、暴露和结果的影响。无论重点如何,OSH 研究都应纳入包容性的招募、数据收集和分析方法,以反映社会多样性,并考虑到社会条件的不同经历。OSH 研究人员应跨学科合作,将工作纳入更广泛的健康公平研究议程。