• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Advancing inclusive research with people with profound and multiple learning disabilities through a sensory-dialogical approach.通过感官对话方法,推进有严重和多重学习障碍人士的包容性研究。
J Intellect Disabil. 2023 Mar;27(1):40-53. doi: 10.1177/17446295211062390. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
2
Determining the competences of community based workers for disability-inclusive development in rural areas of South Africa, Botswana and Malawi.确定南非、博茨瓦纳和马拉维农村地区社区工作者在促进包容性残疾发展方面的能力。
Rural Remote Health. 2015 Apr-Jun;15(2):2919. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
3
Conceptualizing inclusive research with people with intellectual disability.将智障人士纳入研究的概念化。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2014 Jan;27(1):3-12. doi: 10.1111/jar.12083. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
4
The added value of inclusive research.包容性研究的附加值。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2018 Sep;31(5):751-759. doi: 10.1111/jar.12431. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
5
A collaborative group method of inclusive research.协作式包容性研究方法。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2014 Jan;27(1):54-64. doi: 10.1111/jar.12082. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
6
Technology and the environment: supportive resource or barrier for people with developmental disabilities?技术与环境:对发育障碍者而言是支持性资源还是障碍?
Nurs Clin North Am. 2003 Jun;38(2):331-49. doi: 10.1016/s0029-6465(02)00053-1.
7
Music-based interventions for people with profound and multiple learning disabilities: A systematic review of the literature.基于音乐的干预措施对患有严重多重学习障碍的人的影响:文献系统评价。
J Intellect Disabil. 2023 Jun;27(2):370-387. doi: 10.1177/17446295221087563. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
8
A systematic review and narrative synthesis of inclusive health and social care research with people with intellectual disabilities: How are co-researchers involved and what are their experiences?包容性健康和社会关怀研究与智力残疾人士:共同研究者如何参与及其经验如何?的系统评价和叙述性综合
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2023 Jul;36(4):681-701. doi: 10.1111/jar.13100. Epub 2023 Apr 1.
9
Cripping Collaboration: Science Fiction and the Access to Disability Worlds.残障协作:科幻小说与残障世界的融入
Med Anthropol. 2023 Nov 17;42(8):720-736. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2023.2230345. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
10
A membership categorization analysis of roles, activities and relationships in inclusive research conducted by co-researchers with intellectual disabilities.由患有智力残疾的共同研究者开展的包容性研究中角色、活动及关系的成员分类分析。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2019 May;32(3):719-729. doi: 10.1111/jar.12567. Epub 2019 Feb 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Using Supporters to Increase Participation in Qualitative Research Interviews by People With Intellectual Disabilities.利用支持者提高智障人士对定性研究访谈的参与度
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2025 Jul;38(4):e70094. doi: 10.1111/jar.70094.
2
A scoping review investigating the perspectives of people with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities on experiences of cyberbullying victimisation and its subtypes.一项范围综述,调查轻度至中度智力残疾者对网络欺凌受害经历及其亚型的看法。
J Intellect Disabil. 2024 May 8:17446295241252214. doi: 10.1177/17446295241252214.
3
Self-reported explanations for self-injury by people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review of qualitative studies.智力障碍者对自我伤害的自述性解释:定性研究的系统综述
Int J Dev Disabil. 2022 Jul 19;70(3):382-396. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2022.2098665. eCollection 2024.
4
Pushing the boundaries of digital social contact: Experiences of people with disabilities and their social networks during the COVID-19 pandemic.拓展数字社交联系的边界:COVID-19 大流行期间残疾人士及其社交网络的体验。
J Intellect Disabil. 2024 Dec;28(4):940-961. doi: 10.1177/17446295231210021. Epub 2023 Oct 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Looking back, looking forward: Methodological challenges and future directions in research on persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities.回首往昔,展望未来:针对重度智力残疾及多重残疾人士的研究中的方法学挑战与未来方向
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2021 Jan;34(1):250-262. doi: 10.1111/jar.12803. Epub 2020 Oct 18.
2
Recruiting and Retaining People With Disabilities for Qualitative Health Research: Challenges and Solutions.招募和留住残疾人士参与定性健康研究:挑战与解决方案。
Qual Health Res. 2019 Jun;29(7):1056-1064. doi: 10.1177/1049732319833361. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
3
The added value of inclusive research.包容性研究的附加值。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2018 Sep;31(5):751-759. doi: 10.1111/jar.12431. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
4
The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: a foundation for ethical disability and health research in developing countries.《残疾人权利公约》:发展中国家残疾与健康伦理研究的基础。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Nov;104(11):2037-43. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302006. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
5
Including adults with intellectual disabilities who lack capacity to consent in research.包括在研究中缺乏同意能力的智障成年人。
Nurs Ethics. 2012 Jul;19(4):558-67. doi: 10.1177/0969733011426818.
6
A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies.综述的类型学:对14种综述类型及相关方法的分析。
Health Info Libr J. 2009 Jun;26(2):91-108. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.
7
Research ethics and the use of visual images in research with people with intellectual disability.研究伦理与智障人士研究中视觉图像的使用。
J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2009 Mar;34(1):45-54. doi: 10.1080/13668250802688306.
8
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.《残疾人权利公约》
Eur J Health Law. 2007 Nov;14(3):281-98. doi: 10.1515/9783110208856.203.
9
What is dialogical research, and why should we do it?
Qual Health Res. 2005 Sep;15(7):964-74. doi: 10.1177/1049732305279078.

通过感官对话方法,推进有严重和多重学习障碍人士的包容性研究。

Advancing inclusive research with people with profound and multiple learning disabilities through a sensory-dialogical approach.

机构信息

Faculty of Health, 217199Sandnes. VID Specialized University, Sandnes, Norway.

Faculty of Health, 87368Oslo. VID Specialized University, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

J Intellect Disabil. 2023 Mar;27(1):40-53. doi: 10.1177/17446295211062390. Epub 2022 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1177/17446295211062390
PMID:35015585
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9941796/
Abstract

People with profound and multiple learning disabilities are often excluded from the processes of knowledge production and face barriers to inclusion in research due to cognitive and communicative challenges. Inclusive research-even when intending to be inclusive-tends to operate within criteria that exclude people with profound and multiple learning disabilities. The aim of this article is to provide a state-of-the-art review of the topic of inclusive research involving people with profound disabilities and thereby challenge traditional assumptions of inclusive research. The review presents themes that will inform a discussion on how to challenge the criteria in ways that make it possible to understand inclusive research for people who communicate in unconventional ways. We argue that a fruitful way of rethinking inclusive research is by applying a sensory-dialogical approach that privileges the dialogical and sensory foundations of the research. We suggest this might be a way to understand inclusive research that regards the person's communicative and cognitive distinctiveness.

摘要

患有严重多重学习障碍的人通常被排除在知识生产过程之外,并且由于认知和沟通方面的挑战,他们在研究中也面临着融入的障碍。即使包容性研究旨在包容,它也往往在排除严重多重学习障碍者的标准内运作。本文的目的是对涉及严重残疾人士的包容性研究主题进行最新综述,从而挑战包容性研究的传统假设。这篇综述提出了一些主题,这些主题将为如何以一种能够让以非传统方式进行交流的人理解包容性研究的方式来挑战标准提供讨论。我们认为,重新思考包容性研究的一个富有成效的方法是应用一种感官对话方法,该方法优先考虑研究的对话和感官基础。我们建议,这可能是一种理解包容性研究的方式,即关注人的交际和认知独特性。