Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, One Brigham Circle, 1620 Tremont Street, Suite 2-016, Boston, MA, 02120, USA.
Department of Occupational and Community Health, Tufts University, Medford, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 May;37(6):1484-1493. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07208-3. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
To date, most research on patients' experiences with advance care planning (ACP) focuses on motivations to engage in discussions and how patients prepare. Gaps remain in understanding how non-critically ill Medicare patients perceive ACP encounters, including how they characterize positive and negative experiences with ACP.
Understanding these patients' perceptions is imperative as Medicare has sought to incentivize provision of ACP services via two billing codes in 2016.
Qualitative focus group study. Thematic analysis was performed to assess participants ACP experience.
Medicare beneficiaries who had engaged in or were billed for ACP.
Seven focus groups were conducted with 34 Medicare beneficiaries who had engaged in ACP across 5 US health systems. Participants described a spectrum of perceptions regarding ACP, and a range of delivery approaches, including group ACP, discussions with specialists during serious illness, and ACP in primary care settings during wellness visits. Despite being billed for ACP or having ACP services noted in their medical record, many did not recognize that they had engaged in ACP, expressed lack of clarity over the term "ACP," and were unaware of the Medicare billing codes. Among participants who described quality patient-centered ACP experiences, three additional themes were identified: trusted and established patient/clinician relationships, transparent communication and documentation, and an understanding that ACP is revisable. Participants offered recommendations for clinicians and health systems to improve the patient ACP experience.
Findings include actionable steps to promote patient-centered ACP experiences, including clinician training to support improved communication and facilitating shared decision-making, allocating sufficient clinical time for discussions, and ensuring that documentation of preferences is clear and accessible. Other approaches such as group ACP and ACP navigators may help to support patient interests within clinical constraints and need to be further explored.
迄今为止,大多数关于患者对预先医疗照护计划(ACP)体验的研究都集中在参与讨论的动机以及患者如何准备上。在理解非危重症 Medicare 患者如何看待 ACP 接触,包括他们如何描述 ACP 的积极和消极体验方面,仍存在空白。
了解这些患者的看法至关重要,因为 Medicare 已试图通过 2016 年的两个计费代码来激励 ACP 服务的提供。
定性焦点小组研究。对参与者的 ACP 体验进行了主题分析评估。
参与过 ACP 或已为 ACP 计费的 Medicare 受益人。
在 5 个美国卫生系统中,进行了 7 次焦点小组讨论,参与者是 Medicare 受益人,他们在这 5 个卫生系统中都参与过 ACP。参与者描述了他们对 ACP 的看法,以及各种交付方法,包括 ACP 小组讨论、在重病期间与专家讨论、在初级保健环境中进行的 ACP 健康检查。尽管已为 ACP 计费或其医疗记录中注明了 ACP 服务,但许多人没有意识到自己已经参与了 ACP,对“ACP”一词的含义不明确,也不知道 Medicare 的计费代码。在描述了高质量以患者为中心的 ACP 体验的参与者中,确定了另外三个主题:信任和建立的医患关系、透明的沟通和记录,以及理解 ACP 是可修改的。参与者为改善患者 ACP 体验提出了对临床医生和卫生系统的建议。
研究结果包括促进以患者为中心的 ACP 体验的可操作步骤,包括培训临床医生以支持改善沟通和促进共同决策、分配足够的临床时间进行讨论,以及确保偏好的记录清晰可及。其他方法,如 ACP 小组讨论和 ACP 导航员,可能有助于在临床限制内支持患者的利益,需要进一步探索。