• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于静息态 MEG 功能连接度指标的图测度在传感器和源空间中的可重复性。

Reproducibility of graph measures derived from resting-state MEG functional connectivity metrics in sensor and source spaces.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.

Magnetoencephalography Laboratory, Dell Children's Medical Center, Austin, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Mar;43(4):1342-1357. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25726. Epub 2022 Jan 12.

DOI:10.1002/hbm.25726
PMID:35019189
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8837594/
Abstract

Prior studies have used graph analysis of resting-state magnetoencephalography (MEG) to characterize abnormal brain networks in neurological disorders. However, a present challenge for researchers is the lack of guidance on which network construction strategies to employ. The reproducibility of graph measures is important for their use as clinical biomarkers. Furthermore, global graph measures should ideally not depend on whether the analysis was performed in the sensor or source space. Therefore, MEG data of the 89 healthy subjects of the Human Connectome Project were used to investigate test-retest reliability and sensor versus source association of global graph measures. Atlas-based beamforming was used for source reconstruction, and functional connectivity (FC) was estimated for both sensor and source signals in six frequency bands using the debiased weighted phase lag index (dwPLI), amplitude envelope correlation (AEC), and leakage-corrected AEC. Reliability was examined over multiple network density levels achieved with proportional weight and orthogonal minimum spanning tree thresholding. At a 100% density, graph measures for most FC metrics and frequency bands had fair to excellent reliability and significant sensor versus source association. The greatest reliability and sensor versus source association was obtained when using amplitude metrics. Reliability was similar between sensor and source spaces when using amplitude metrics but greater for the source than the sensor space in higher frequency bands when using the dwPLI. These results suggest that graph measures are useful biomarkers, particularly for investigating functional networks based on amplitude synchrony.

摘要

先前的研究已经使用静息态脑磁图(MEG)的图分析来描述神经障碍中的异常大脑网络。然而,研究人员目前面临的一个挑战是缺乏关于应采用哪种网络构建策略的指导。图度量的可重复性对于将其用作临床生物标志物非常重要。此外,全局图度量理想情况下不应取决于分析是在传感器还是源空间中进行。因此,使用人类连接组计划的 89 名健康受试者的 MEG 数据来研究全局图度量的测试-重测可靠性和传感器与源的关联。基于图谱的波束形成用于源重建,并且使用无偏加权相位滞后指数(dwPLI)、幅度包络相关(AEC)和校正泄漏的 AEC 在六个频带中对传感器和源信号估计功能连接(FC)。在使用比例权重和正交最小生成树阈值实现的多个网络密度水平上检查可靠性。在 100%密度下,大多数 FC 指标和频带的图度量具有良好到优秀的可靠性和显著的传感器与源关联。当使用幅度指标时,获得了最大的可靠性和传感器与源关联。当使用幅度指标时,传感器和源空间之间的可靠性相似,但当使用 dwPLI 时,在较高的频带中,源空间的可靠性大于传感器空间。这些结果表明,图度量是有用的生物标志物,特别是用于研究基于幅度同步的功能网络。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b684/8837594/c71655acc40d/HBM-43-1342-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b684/8837594/e97b1a0f01a6/HBM-43-1342-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b684/8837594/2667bc3a6776/HBM-43-1342-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b684/8837594/7cfc484b2a43/HBM-43-1342-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b684/8837594/79da729dbdd7/HBM-43-1342-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b684/8837594/12c57904b5ba/HBM-43-1342-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b684/8837594/c71655acc40d/HBM-43-1342-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b684/8837594/e97b1a0f01a6/HBM-43-1342-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b684/8837594/2667bc3a6776/HBM-43-1342-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b684/8837594/7cfc484b2a43/HBM-43-1342-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b684/8837594/79da729dbdd7/HBM-43-1342-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b684/8837594/12c57904b5ba/HBM-43-1342-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b684/8837594/c71655acc40d/HBM-43-1342-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Reproducibility of graph measures derived from resting-state MEG functional connectivity metrics in sensor and source spaces.基于静息态 MEG 功能连接度指标的图测度在传感器和源空间中的可重复性。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Mar;43(4):1342-1357. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25726. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
2
Graph theoretical analysis of resting-state MEG data: Identifying interhemispheric connectivity and the default mode.静息态脑磁图数据的图论分析:识别大脑两半球间的连接和默认模式。
Neuroimage. 2014 Aug 1;96:88-94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.065. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
3
Exploring MEG brain fingerprints: Evaluation, pitfalls, and interpretations.探索脑磁图(MEG)脑指纹:评估、陷阱和解释。
Neuroimage. 2021 Oct 15;240:118331. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118331. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
4
Quantifying the Test-Retest Reliability of Magnetoencephalography Resting-State Functional Connectivity.量化脑磁图静息态功能连接的重测信度
Brain Connect. 2016 Jul;6(6):448-60. doi: 10.1089/brain.2015.0416. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
5
Reliability of Magnetoencephalography and High-Density Electroencephalography Resting-State Functional Connectivity Metrics.静息态功能磁共振和高密度脑电图连接性测量的可靠性。
Brain Connect. 2019 Sep;9(7):539-553. doi: 10.1089/brain.2019.0662. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
6
A systematic evaluation of source reconstruction of resting MEG of the human brain with a new high-resolution atlas: Performance, precision, and parcellation.基于新高分辨率图谱的人脑静息态 MEG 源重建的系统评估:性能、精度和分割。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 Oct 1;42(14):4685-4707. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25578. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
7
Reduced parietal alpha power and psychotic symptoms: Test-retest reliability of resting-state magnetoencephalography in schizophrenia and healthy controls.顶叶α 功率降低与精神病症状:精神分裂症及健康对照者静息态脑磁图的测试-重测信度。
Schizophr Res. 2020 Jan;215:229-240. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.10.023. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
8
How reliable are the functional connectivity networks of MEG in resting states?静息态下 MEG 的功能连接网络有多可靠?
J Neurophysiol. 2011 Dec;106(6):2888-95. doi: 10.1152/jn.00335.2011. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
9
How reliable are MEG resting-state connectivity metrics?脑磁图静息态连接性指标的可靠性如何?
Neuroimage. 2016 Sep;138:284-293. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.05.070. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
10
Reproducibility of graph metrics of human brain functional networks.人类脑功能网络图形指标的可重复性。
Neuroimage. 2009 Oct 1;47(4):1460-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.035. Epub 2009 May 20.

引用本文的文献

1
The relationship between neuromagnetic networks and cognitive impairment in self-limited epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes.具有中央颞区棘波的自限性癫痫中神经磁网络与认知障碍之间的关系。
Epilepsia Open. 2025 Jun;10(3):842-854. doi: 10.1002/epi4.70044. Epub 2025 Apr 15.
2
Age-Specific Functional Connectivity Changes After Partial Sleep Deprivation Are Correlated With Neurocognitive and Molecular Signatures.部分睡眠剥夺后特定年龄的功能连接变化与神经认知和分子特征相关。
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2025 Feb;31(2):e70272. doi: 10.1111/cns.70272.
3
Transient cortical beta-frequency oscillations associated with contextual novelty in high density mouse EEG.

本文引用的文献

1
Combining network topology and information theory to construct representative brain networks.结合网络拓扑结构和信息理论构建具有代表性的脑网络。
Netw Neurosci. 2021 Feb 1;5(1):96-124. doi: 10.1162/netn_a_00170. eCollection 2021.
2
Lateralization of epilepsy using intra-hemispheric brain networks based on resting-state MEG data.基于静息态脑磁图数据的半球内脑网络对癫痫的侧化研究。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Aug 1;41(11):2964-2979. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24990. Epub 2020 May 13.
3
Virtual resection predicts surgical outcome for drug-resistant epilepsy.
与高密度小鼠脑电图中情境新奇性相关的短暂皮质β频率振荡。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 23;15(1):2897. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86008-9.
4
Functional network disruption in cognitively unimpaired autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease: a magnetoencephalography study.认知未受损的常染色体显性阿尔茨海默病中的功能网络破坏:一项脑磁图研究。
Brain Commun. 2024 Nov 25;6(6):fcae423. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae423. eCollection 2024.
5
Genetic fingerprinting with heritable phenotypes of the resting-state brain network topology.基于静息态脑网络拓扑结构的遗传性表型的遗传指纹识别。
Commun Biol. 2024 Sep 30;7(1):1221. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06807-0.
6
Systematic evaluation of fMRI data-processing pipelines for consistent functional connectomics.系统评估 fMRI 数据处理管道,以实现一致的功能连接组学。
Nat Commun. 2024 Jun 4;15(1):4745. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48781-5.
7
The time-evolving epileptic brain network: concepts, definitions, accomplishments, perspectives.随时间演变的癫痫脑网络:概念、定义、成就与展望。
Front Netw Physiol. 2024 Jan 16;3:1338864. doi: 10.3389/fnetp.2023.1338864. eCollection 2023.
8
Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation in the treatment of disorders of consciousness: mechanisms and applications.经皮耳迷走神经刺激治疗意识障碍:机制与应用
Front Neurosci. 2023 Oct 18;17:1286267. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1286267. eCollection 2023.
9
DISCOVER-EEG: an open, fully automated EEG pipeline for biomarker discovery in clinical neuroscience.DISCOVER-EEG:一种用于临床神经科学中生物标志物发现的开放、全自动 EEG 流水线。
Sci Data. 2023 Sep 11;10(1):613. doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02525-0.
10
Harmonized multi-metric and multi-centric assessment of EEG source space connectivity for dementia characterization.用于痴呆症特征描述的脑电图源空间连通性的多指标多中心协调评估。
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2023 Jul 8;15(3):e12455. doi: 10.1002/dad2.12455. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.
虚拟切除预测耐药性癫痫的手术结果。
Brain. 2019 Dec 1;142(12):3892-3905. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz303.
4
Identification of the Early Stage of Alzheimer's Disease Using Structural MRI and Resting-State fMRI.使用结构磁共振成像和静息态功能磁共振成像识别阿尔茨海默病的早期阶段
Front Neurol. 2019 Aug 30;10:904. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00904. eCollection 2019.
5
Test-retest reliability of EEG network characteristics in infants.婴儿脑电图网络特征的重测信度。
Brain Behav. 2019 May;9(5):e01269. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1269. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
6
Graph theory approaches to functional network organization in brain disorders: A critique for a brave new small-world.大脑疾病中功能网络组织的图论方法:对一个勇敢的新小世界的批判。
Netw Neurosci. 2018 Oct 1;3(1):1-26. doi: 10.1162/netn_a_00054. eCollection 2019.
7
Reliability of Static and Dynamic Network Metrics in the Resting-State: A MEG-Beamformed Connectivity Analysis.静息态下静态和动态网络指标的可靠性:脑磁图波束形成连接性分析
Front Neurosci. 2018 Aug 3;12:506. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00506. eCollection 2018.
8
A comparison between scalp- and source-reconstructed EEG networks.头皮重建和源重建 EEG 网络的比较。
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 16;8(1):12269. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30869-w.
9
Predicting seizure outcome of vagus nerve stimulation using MEG-based network topology.基于脑磁图的网络拓扑结构预测迷走神经刺激术的癫痫发作结果。
Neuroimage Clin. 2018 Jun 18;19:990-999. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.06.017. eCollection 2018.
10
Ghost interactions in MEG/EEG source space: A note of caution on inter-areal coupling measures.脑磁图/脑电图源空间中的幽灵交互:区域间耦合测量的注意事项
Neuroimage. 2018 Jun;173:632-643. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.032. Epub 2018 Feb 22.