• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究人类空肠微生物组。

Investigating the human jejunal microbiota.

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Postbox 2168, 3103, Tønsberg, Norway.

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Vestfold Hospital Trust, 3103, Tønsberg, Norway.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 31;12(1):1682. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05723-9.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-05723-9
PMID:35102222
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8803847/
Abstract

Descriptions of the small intestinal microbiota are deficient and conflicting. We aimed to get a reliable description of the jejunal bacterial microbiota by investigating samples from two separate jejunal segments collected from the luminal mucosa during surgery. Sixty patients with morbid obesity selected for elective gastric bypass surgery were included in this survey. Samples collected by rubbing a swab against the mucosa of proximal and mid jejunal segments were characterized both quantitatively and qualitatively using a combination of microbial culture, a universal quantitative PCR and 16S deep sequencing. Within the inherent limitations of partial 16S sequencing, bacteria were assigned to the species level. By microbial culture, 53 patients (88.3%) had an estimated bacterial density of < 1600 cfu/ml in both segments whereof 31 (51.7%) were culture negative in both segments corresponding to a bacterial density below 160 cfu/ml. By quantitative PCR, 46 patients (76.7%) had less than 10 bacterial genomes/ml in both segments. The most abundant and frequently identified species by 16S deep sequencing were associated with the oral cavity, most often from the Streptococcus mitis group, the Streptococcus sanguinis group, Granulicatella adiacens/para-adiacens, the Schaalia odontolytica complex and Gemella haemolysans/taiwanensis. In general, few bacterial species were identified per sample and there was a low consistency both between the two investigated segments in each patient and between patients. The jejunal mucosa of fasting obese patients contains relatively few microorganisms and a core microbiota could not be established. The identified microbes are likely representatives of a transient microbiota and there is a high degree of overlap between the most frequently identified species in the jejunum and the recently described ileum core microbiota.

摘要

对小肠微生物组的描述是不足和相互矛盾的。我们旨在通过研究手术期间从两个不同的空肠段的腔黏膜中收集的样本,获得对空肠细菌微生物组的可靠描述。这项调查纳入了 60 名因病态肥胖而选择接受择期胃旁路手术的患者。通过用拭子擦拭近端和中段空肠段的黏膜来收集样本,使用微生物培养、通用定量 PCR 和 16S 深度测序的组合对样本进行定量和定性分析。在部分 16S 测序的固有局限性内,将细菌分配到种水平。通过微生物培养,53 名患者(88.3%)在两个段的估计细菌密度均<1600 cfu/ml,其中 31 名(51.7%)在两个段均为培养阴性,对应的细菌密度低于 160 cfu/ml。通过定量 PCR,46 名患者(76.7%)在两个段的细菌基因组均<10 个/ml。通过 16S 深度测序最丰富和最常鉴定的物种与口腔有关,最常见的是来自缓症链球菌属、血链球菌属、颗粒亚种/副颗粒亚种、Schaalia odontolytica 复合体和 Gemella haemolysans/taiwanensis。一般来说,每个样本中鉴定的细菌种类较少,每个患者的两个研究段之间以及患者之间的一致性较低。禁食肥胖患者的空肠黏膜中含有相对较少的微生物,并且无法建立核心微生物组。鉴定出的微生物可能是短暂微生物组的代表,并且在空肠中最常鉴定的物种与最近描述的回肠核心微生物组之间存在高度重叠。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e13c/8803847/2582e124c754/41598_2022_5723_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e13c/8803847/b433f7f39bf2/41598_2022_5723_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e13c/8803847/fdbea6217187/41598_2022_5723_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e13c/8803847/2582e124c754/41598_2022_5723_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e13c/8803847/b433f7f39bf2/41598_2022_5723_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e13c/8803847/fdbea6217187/41598_2022_5723_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e13c/8803847/2582e124c754/41598_2022_5723_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Investigating the human jejunal microbiota.研究人类空肠微生物组。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 31;12(1):1682. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05723-9.
2
The human jejunum has an endogenous microbiota that differs from those in the oral cavity and colon.人类空肠拥有与口腔和结肠不同的内源性微生物群。
BMC Microbiol. 2017 Jul 17;17(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12866-017-1059-6.
3
Species Level Description of the Human Ileal Bacterial Microbiota.人类回肠细菌微生物组的种水平描述。
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 16;8(1):4736. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23198-5.
4
A shared group of bacterial taxa in the duodenal microbiota of undernourished Pakistani children with environmental enteric dysfunction.营养不良的巴基斯坦儿童中具有环境肠道功能障碍的十二指肠微生物群中的共享细菌分类群。
mSphere. 2024 Jun 25;9(6):e0019624. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00196-24. Epub 2024 May 14.
5
Analysis of Transcriptionally Active Bacteria Throughout the Gastrointestinal Tract of Healthy Individuals.健康个体整个胃肠道中具有转录活性的细菌分析。
Gastroenterology. 2019 Oct;157(4):1081-1092.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.05.068. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
6
Alteration in human defensin-5 expression following gastric bypass surgery.胃旁路手术后人类防御素-5表达的改变。
J Clin Pathol. 2007 Sep;60(9):1029-34. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2006.041871. Epub 2007 Apr 5.
7
Kinetic changes of intestinal microbiota in the course of intestinal sensitization.肠道致敏过程中肠道微生物群的动力学变化。
Oncotarget. 2016 Dec 6;7(49):81197-81207. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12797.
8
Spatial and temporal organization of jejunal microbiota in goats during animal development process.动物发育过程中小肠微生物区系的时空组织。
J Appl Microbiol. 2021 Jul;131(1):68-79. doi: 10.1111/jam.14961. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
9
Post-natal co-development of the microbiota and gut barrier function follows different paths in the small and large intestine in piglets.仔猪的小肠道和大肠道中,微生物群和肠道屏障功能的产后共同发育遵循不同的途径。
FASEB J. 2020 Jan;34(1):1430-1446. doi: 10.1096/fj.201902514R. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
10
High throughput sequencing reveals distinct microbial populations within the mucosal and luminal niches in healthy individuals.高通量测序揭示了健康个体黏膜和管腔生态位内不同的微生物群落。
Gut Microbes. 2015;6(3):173-81. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2015.1044711.

引用本文的文献

1
Sampling strategies for digestive system flora studies: current research and perspectives.消化系统菌群研究的采样策略:当前研究与展望
PeerJ. 2025 Aug 13;13:e19810. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19810. eCollection 2025.
2
Examining spatial microbiome variations across gastrointestinal tract regions in obesity.研究肥胖症患者胃肠道不同区域的空间微生物组差异。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 14;15(1):25423. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10931-0.
3
Enhancing the Adhesion/Colonization Efficacy of Probiotics by Polysaccharide Surface Decoration for Remission from Ulcerative Colitis.

本文引用的文献

1
Intestinal microbiota: The hidden gems in the gut?肠道微生物群:肠道中的隐藏瑰宝?
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2020 Dec;38(4):215-224. doi: 10.12932/AP-020720-0897.
2
Jejunum: The understudied meeting place of dietary lipids and the microbiota.空肠:饮食脂质与微生物群的研究不足之地。
Biochimie. 2020 Nov;178:124-136. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2020.09.007. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
3
Applying the core microbiome to understand host-microbe systems.应用核心微生物组理解宿主-微生物系统。
通过多糖表面修饰提高益生菌的黏附/定殖功效以缓解溃疡性结肠炎
Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2025 Jul 11. doi: 10.1007/s12602-025-10653-9.
4
Novel potential biomarkers for predicting childhood caries via metagenomic analysis.通过宏基因组分析预测儿童龋齿的新型潜在生物标志物
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 Jun 17;15:1522970. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1522970. eCollection 2025.
5
Do we need a standardized 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing analysis protocol for poultry microbiota research?家禽微生物群研究是否需要标准化的16S rRNA基因扩增子测序分析方案?
Poult Sci. 2025 Jul;104(7):105242. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.105242. Epub 2025 May 1.
6
Profiling the human luminal small intestinal microbiome using a novel ingestible medical device.使用新型可摄入式医疗设备分析人类小肠腔微生物群。
medRxiv. 2025 Apr 20:2025.04.18.25326056. doi: 10.1101/2025.04.18.25326056.
7
Distribution of gut microbiota across intestinal segments and their impact on human physiological and pathological processes.肠道微生物群在肠道各段的分布及其对人类生理和病理过程的影响。
Cell Biosci. 2025 Apr 16;15(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13578-025-01385-y.
8
Optimizing microbiome reference databases with PacBio full-length 16S rRNA sequencing for enhanced taxonomic classification and biomarker discovery.利用PacBio全长16S rRNA测序优化微生物组参考数据库,以增强分类学分类和生物标志物发现。
Front Microbiol. 2024 Nov 25;15:1485073. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1485073. eCollection 2024.
9
Gut microbiota patterns associated with duration of diarrhea in children under five years of age in Ethiopia.与埃塞俄比亚五岁以下儿童腹泻持续时间相关的肠道微生物群模式。
Nat Commun. 2024 Sep 2;15(1):7532. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-51464-w.
10
Changes in the Gastrointestinal Microbiota Induced by Proton Pump Inhibitors-A Review of Findings from Experimental Trials.质子泵抑制剂诱导的胃肠道微生物群变化——实验性试验结果综述
Microorganisms. 2024 May 30;12(6):1110. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12061110.
J Anim Ecol. 2020 Jul;89(7):1549-1558. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13229. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
4
Mapping the Segmental Microbiomes in the Human Small Bowel in Comparison with Stool: A REIMAGINE Study.比较粪便与人类小肠段微生物组图谱:REIMAGINE 研究。
Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Sep;65(9):2595-2604. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06173-x. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
5
Regional Diversity of the Gastrointestinal Microbiome.肠道微生物组的区域多样性。
Cell Host Microbe. 2019 Sep 11;26(3):314-324. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2019.08.011.
6
Characterization of Proximal Small Intestinal Microbiota in Patients With Suspected Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth: A Cross-Sectional Study.疑似小肠细菌过度生长患者的近端小肠微生物组特征:一项横断面研究。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2019 Aug;10(8):e00073. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000073.
7
Spatial and Temporal Analysis of the Stomach and Small-Intestinal Microbiota in Fasted Healthy Humans.空腹健康人体的胃和小肠微生物组的时空分析。
mSphere. 2019 Mar 13;4(2):e00126-19. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00126-19.
8
Mucosa-Associated Microbiota in the Gastrointestinal Tract of Healthy Japanese Subjects.健康日本受试者胃肠道的黏膜相关微生物群。
Digestion. 2020;101(2):107-120. doi: 10.1159/000496102. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
9
The bacterial aetiology of pleural empyema. A descriptive and comparative metagenomic study.胸腔积脓性胸膜炎的细菌病因。描述性和比较性宏基因组学研究。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019 Aug;25(8):981-986. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.11.030. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
10
Repertoire of the gut microbiota from stomach to colon using culturomics and next-generation sequencing.应用培养组学和下一代测序技术研究从胃到结肠的肠道微生物组。
BMC Microbiol. 2018 Oct 24;18(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12866-018-1304-7.