Masood Pirzada Faisal, Goel Hemant Kumar, Sharma Umesh, Gahlawat Sumit, Guleria Karandeep, Sood Rajeev
Department of Urology and Renal Transplant, Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences - Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Turk J Urol. 2021 Sep;47(5):386-391. doi: 10.5152/tud.2021.21172.
The major disadvantage of radical perineal prostatectomy (RPP) is the difficulty to perform pelvic lymphadenectomy via the same incision. Open retropubic, mini laparotomy, and transperitoneal laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy as an adjunct to open RPP have been tried but need change in patient position and separate incision, thereby decreasing the acceptability of this procedure. Open RPP followed by a lap perineal pelvic lymphadenectomy via the same perineal incision is a hybrid technique that is aimed to decrease morbidity of lymphadenectomy.
Patients of low and intermediate risk localized carcinoma prostate with a Partin score of >5% were taken for this procedure. After completing prostatectomy part of RPP, lap perineal pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed via same incision using single incision laparoscopic surgery port.
We performed this new hybrid technique in eight patients. Bilateral lymph node dissection required an additional mean time of 35 minutes. A total of 68 nodes were retrieved from eight patients with a median number of eight nodes (range: 6-12). None of our cases had any complications related to lymphadenectomy. Bilateral lymph node dissection was feasible in seven patients, and in one patient, it could be done on one side only.
Sandwiching lap perineal pelvic lymphadenectomy between prostatectomy part of RPP and urethra-vesical anastomosis (by open approach) is a safe, reproducible, and feasible approach to pelvic lymphadenectomy compared to lymphadenectomy from other routes with simultaneous reduction in the operative time, patient morbidity, and discomfort. Ease of doing lymphadenectomy from same incision can increase the acceptability of this excellent procedure.
根治性会阴前列腺切除术(RPP)的主要缺点是难以通过同一切口进行盆腔淋巴结清扫术。作为开放性RPP辅助手段的开放性耻骨后、迷你剖腹术和经腹腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫术都曾尝试过,但需要改变患者体位并另做切口,从而降低了该手术的可接受性。开放性RPP后经同一会阴切口进行腹腔镜会阴盆腔淋巴结清扫术是一种混合技术,旨在降低淋巴结清扫术的发病率。
选取Partin评分>5%的低危和中危局限性前列腺癌患者进行该手术。在完成RPP的前列腺切除部分后,使用单切口腹腔镜手术端口经同一切口进行腹腔镜会阴盆腔淋巴结清扫术。
我们对8例患者实施了这种新的混合技术。双侧淋巴结清扫平均额外需要35分钟。8例患者共取出68个淋巴结,中位数为8个淋巴结(范围:6 - 12个)。我们所有病例均未出现与淋巴结清扫术相关的并发症。7例患者可行双侧淋巴结清扫,1例患者仅能进行一侧清扫。
与通过其他途径进行淋巴结清扫相比,在RPP的前列腺切除部分与会阴 - 膀胱吻合术(开放入路)之间夹入腹腔镜会阴盆腔淋巴结清扫术是一种安全、可重复且可行的盆腔淋巴结清扫方法,同时可减少手术时间、患者发病率和不适感。经同一切口进行淋巴结清扫的便利性可提高这种优秀手术的可接受性。