Suppr超能文献

微生物接种剂对象草()和玉米(L.)青贮饲料发酵品质及微生物群影响的比较

Comparison of the Effects of Microbial Inoculants on Fermentation Quality and Microbiota in Napier Grass () and Corn ( L.) Silage.

作者信息

Jaipolsaen Narongrit, Sangsritavong Siwat, Uengwetwanit Tanaporn, Angthong Pacharaporn, Plengvidhya Vethachai, Rungrassamee Wanilada, Yammuenart Saowaluck

机构信息

Physiology and Nutrition Research Team, National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Pathum Thani, Thailand.

Microarray Research Team, National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Pathum Thani, Thailand.

出版信息

Front Microbiol. 2022 Jan 20;12:784535. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.784535. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Forage preservation for livestock feeding is usually done by drying the plant material and storing it as hay or ensiling it into silage. During the ensiling process, the pH in the system is lowered by the activities of lactic acid-producing bacteria (LAB), inhibiting the growth of spoilage microorganisms and maintaining the quality of the ensiled product. To improve this process, inoculation of LAB could be used as starter cultures to shorten the ensiling time and control the fermentation process. Here, we compared fermentation quality and bacterial dynamics in two plant materials, whole-plant corn ( L.) and Napier grass (), with and without starter inoculation. The efficacy of , , and as starter cultures were also compared in the ensiling system. In whole-plant corn, pH decreased significantly, while lactic acid content increased significantly on Day 3 in both the non-inoculated and LAB-inoculated groups. Prior to ensiling, the predominant LAB bacteria were , , and , which shifted to during ensiling of whole-plant corn in both the non-inoculated and LAB inoculated groups. Interestingly, the epiphytic LAB associated with Napier grass were much lower than those of whole-plant corn before ensiling. Consequently, the fermentation quality of Napier grass was improved by the addition of LAB inoculants, especially and a combination of all three selected LAB strains showed better fermentation quality than the non-inoculated control. Therefore, the different abundance and diversity of epiphytic LAB in plant raw materials could be one of the most important factors determining whether LAB starter cultures would be necessary for silage fermentation.

摘要

用于家畜饲养的草料保存通常是通过将植物材料干燥并储存为干草,或将其青贮为青贮饲料来完成的。在青贮过程中,系统中的pH值会因产乳酸细菌(LAB)的活动而降低,从而抑制腐败微生物的生长并保持青贮产品的质量。为了改进这一过程,可以使用LAB接种作为起始培养物来缩短青贮时间并控制发酵过程。在此,我们比较了接种和未接种起始培养物的两种植物材料,即全株玉米(L.)和象草()的发酵质量和细菌动态。还比较了、和作为起始培养物在青贮系统中的功效。在全株玉米中,未接种组和LAB接种组在第3天pH值均显著下降,而乳酸含量均显著增加。青贮前,占主导地位的LAB细菌是、和,在全株玉米青贮过程中,未接种组和LAB接种组的这些细菌均转变为。有趣的是,青贮前与象草相关的附生LAB远低于全株玉米。因此,添加LAB接种剂可提高象草的发酵质量,尤其是,并且所选的所有三种LAB菌株的组合显示出比未接种对照更好的发酵质量。因此,植物原料中附生LAB的不同丰度和多样性可能是决定青贮发酵是否需要LAB起始培养物的最重要因素之一。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26f1/8811201/1548dc2215fb/fmicb-12-784535-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验